Published online Dec 26, 2013. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v5.i12.442
Revised: July 24, 2013
Accepted: August 28, 2013
Published online: December 26, 2013
Processing time: 177 Days and 18 Hours
Coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography has been recognized as the most rapidly developed imaging technique in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease due to the emergence and technological advances in multislice CT scanners. Coronary CT angiography has been confirmed to demonstrate high diagnostic and predictive value in coronary artery disease when compared to invasive coronary angiography. However, it suffers from high radiation dose which raises concerns in the medical field. Various dose-reduction strategies have been proposed with effective outcomes having been achieved to reduce radiation exposure to patients. This article provides an introduction and overview of the series of articles that will focus on each particular topic related to coronary CT angiography.
Core tip: This article provides an overview of a series of articles that focus on individual topic highlight related to coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography. In particular, use of beta-blocker protocol, radiation dose measurements, dose-reduction strategies, diagnostic and prognostic value of coronary CT angiography will be described in detail in each series. Furthermore, potential applications of coronary CT angiography beyond luminal visualization and future directions will also be discussed.
- Citation: Sun Z, Sabarudin A. Coronary CT angiography: State of the art. World J Cardiol 2013; 5(12): 442-443
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v5/i12/442.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v5.i12.442
Over the last decade a great deal of interest has been focused on imaging and diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) using coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography due to its less invasive nature and improved spatial and temporal resolution. With latest multislice CT scanners (64- and post-64 slice CT), coronary CT angiography has been reported to have high diagnostic value, and it can be used as a reliable alternative to invasive coronary angiography in selected patients[1-7]. In addition to the diagnostic value, coronary CT angiography has demonstrated the ability to assess coronary plaques in terms of morphology and plaque characterization, thus providing prognostic information for prediction of major adverse cardiac events[8-11].
Despite these promising reports and increasing studies available in the literature, coronary CT angiography suffers from a major limitation, which is high radiation dose. This has raised serious concerns in the medical field, as radiation-induced cancer is not negligible. Awareness of this issue plays an important role in ensuring that use of coronary CT angiography is medically justified, and dose-reduction strategies are implemented whenever possible, while diagnostic image quality is still acceptable[12].
This series consists of 5 articles on the clinical applications of coronary CT angiography in CAD. Part I deals with beta-blocker administration protocol as beta-blocker is the most commonly used drug to achieve heart rate control during coronary CT angiography. It has become a routine protocol to use beta-blocker to slow down heart rate in patients with heart rate more than 70 beats/min prior to coronary CT angiography, thus, understanding the preparations and patient care is important for clinicians (in particular for those who are inexperienced in performing the coronary CT angiography) to effectively utilize this imaging technique.
Part II focuses on radiation dose measurements in coronary CT angiography. As mentioned above, coronary CT angiography is associated with high radiation dose, therefore, awareness of the basic dosimeters for dose measurement will help clinicians to understand the radiation risks. Part III is about dose-reduction strategies in coronary CT angiography. This part contributes to an overview of different dose-saving methods that are currently recommended in the clinical practice.
Part IV focuses on the diagnostic and prognostic value of coronary CT angiography in CAD. A systematic review of the literature on these two aspects will provide readers with updated information with regard to the current status of coronary CT angiography in terms of diagnostic accuracy and prediction of disease outcomes.
Part V is the last article of this series presenting information on the emerging diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography in CAD, which is entitled coronary CT angiography: beyond luminal visualization. In addition to the evaluation of coronary wall morphology and plaque assessment, coronary CT angiography is able to provide functional information such as assessment of myocardial ischemia which is available with dual-energy CT; hemodynamic analysis of coronary stenosis and plaque, as well as determination of patient-specific lesions (CT-derived fractional flow reserve) with use of computational fluid dynamics. This research area represents some novel applications of coronary CT angiography, although its applications are still at infancy.
In summary, this series provides a comprehensive coverage of different topics related to the coronary CT angiography in CAD, ranging from the patient preparation of heart rate control to dose measurements, dose reduction to the diagnostic and prognostic value. Finally, future research directions of coronary CT angiography are discussed and highlighted in the last part. We believe these articles contribute to improving our knowledge and understanding on coronary CT angiography and its corresponding clinical value.
P- Reviewers: Firstenberg MS, Kasai T S- Editor: Zhai HH L- Editor: A E- Editor: Liu XM
1. | Sun Z, Lin C, Davidson R, Dong C, Liao Y. Diagnostic value of 64-slice CT angiography in coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol. 2008;67:78-84. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 102] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 111] [Article Influence: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Mowatt G, Cook JA, Hillis GS, Walker S, Fraser C, Jia X, Waugh N. 64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2008;94:1386-1393. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 357] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 331] [Article Influence: 20.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | Stein PD, Yaekoub AY, Matta F, Sostman HD. 64-slice CT for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Am J Med. 2008;121:715-725. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 147] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 155] [Article Influence: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Otero HJ, Steigner ML, Rybicki FJ. The “post-64” era of coronary CT angiography: understanding new technology from physical principles. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009;47:79-90. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 67] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 73] [Article Influence: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | Hurlock GS, Higashino H, Mochizuki T. History of cardiac computed tomography: single to 320-detector row multislice computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;25 Suppl 1:31-42. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 57] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 61] [Article Influence: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
6. | Abdulla J, Asferg C, Kofoed KF. Prognostic value of absence or presence of coronary artery disease determined by 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;27:413-420. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 68] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 73] [Article Influence: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Sun Z, Choo GH, Ng KH. Coronary CT angiography: current status and continuing challenges. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:495-510. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 80] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 103] [Article Influence: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
8. | Rana JS, Gransar H, Wong ND, Shaw L, Pencina M, Nasir K, Rozanski A, Hayes SW, Thomson LE, Friedman JD. Comparative value of coronary artery calcium and multiple blood biomarkers for prognostication of cardiovascular events. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109:1449-1453. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 46] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43] [Article Influence: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Gottlieb I, Miller JM, Arbab-Zadeh A, Dewey M, Clouse ME, Sara L, Niinuma H, Bush DE, Paul N, Vavere AL. The absence of coronary calcification does not exclude obstructive coronary artery disease or the need for revascularization in patients referred for conventional coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:627-634. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 205] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 219] [Article Influence: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
10. | Carrigan TP, Nair D, Schoenhagen P, Curtin RJ, Popovic ZB, Halliburton S, Kuzmiak S, White RD, Flamm SD, Desai MY. Prognostic utility of 64-slice computed tomography in patients with suspected but no documented coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:362-371. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 105] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 111] [Article Influence: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
11. | Budoff MJ, Nasir K, McClelland RL, Detrano R, Wong N, Blumenthal RS, Kondos G, Kronmal RA. Coronary calcium predicts events better with absolute calcium scores than age-sex-race/ethnicity percentiles: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:345-352. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 282] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 285] [Article Influence: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Sun Z, Ng KH. Coronary computed tomography angiography in coronary artery disease. World J Cardiol. 2011;3:303-310. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |