Published online Oct 26, 2019. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v11.i10.217
Peer-review started: May 20, 2019
First decision: June 6, 2019
Revised: June 18, 2019
Accepted: September 25, 2019
Article in press: September 25, 2019
Published online: October 26, 2019
Processing time: 163 Days and 13 Hours
Social media has changed the way we learn, educate, and interact with our peers. The dynamic nature of social media and their immediate availability through our portable devices (smartphones, tablets, smartwatches, etc.) is quickly transforming the way we participate in society. The scope of these digital tools is broad as they deal with many different aspects: Teaching and learning, case discussion, congresses coverage, peer to peer interaction, research are examples worth mentioning. The scientific societies considered more innovative, are promoting these tools between their members. These new concepts need to be known by the cardiologists to stay updated, as countless information is moving rapidly through these channels. We summarize the main reasons why learning how to use these tools to be part of the conversation is essential for the cardiologist in training or fully stablished.
Core tip: Social media has changed the way we learn, educate, and interact with our peers. The scientific societies considered more innovative are promoting these tools between their members. These new concepts need to be known by the cardiologists to stay updated, as countless information is moving rapidly through these channels. We summarize the main reasons why learning how to use these tools to be part of the conversation is essential for the cardiologist.
- Citation: Vidal-Perez R, Gómez de Diego JJ, Grapsa J, Fontes-Carvalho R, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR. Social media in cardiology: Reasons to learn how to use it. World J Cardiol 2019; 11(10): 217-220
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v11/i10/217.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v11.i10.217
Social media could be considered as interactive computer-mediated communication tools which have important penetration rates in the general population in middle and high-income countries. Though, in health sciences, many stakeholders (e.g., clinicians, academic institutions, professional colleges, administrators, ministries of health, between others) are unconscious of social media’s relevance[1].
Social media has changed the way we learn, educate, and interact with our peers. The dynamic nature of social media and their immediate availability through our portable devices (smartphones, tablets, smartwatches, etc.) is quickly transforming the way we participate in society[2].
The scope of these digital tools is broad as they deal with many different aspects: Teaching and learning, case discussion, congresses coverage, peer to peer interaction, research are examples worth mentioning. A good summary was shown by Snipelisky[3] about the 4 main reasons to be involved with social media tools: Personal use, networking, education and public health. There are many others, but these 4 aspects are probably the main points. As other authors have highlighted literacy in the “Digital Age” it is a necessity. The two unquestioned realities of the digital times are that you can produce your online digital story, or someone else will make it for you[4].
Social media tools like Twitter could be considered as a new core competency for cardiologists[5]. Why is so important? Twitter can be used to learn, educate, network, and advocate; and these four reasons together give to the social media experts access to great opportunities.
Many authors underline the potential for engagement between peers, there are no boundaries and the communications are near to be immediate[6,7]; even some people believe that mentoring could be possible through social media[8]. Also contact with patients could be done through Social media but we must be cautious with these approach[9].
Another reason to pay attention to these tools is the impact in the cardiology congresses, probably it is the best way to follow minute to minute a congress at home, previously you needed to wait for your partners coming from the Congress or read web chronicles or article publications, now is at the same time all over the world. You only need to search or follow a congress hashtag (like #ACC18 or #ESCCongress or #AHA17), after that you will reach all the content like you were in the congress arena[10,11]. The impact of social media could be measured through the hashtags and is really high as we show in Table 1.
Conference hashtag | Hashtag registration date1 | Total tweets2 (thousands) | Total retweets (thousands) | Total participants (thousands) | Digital impressions3 (millions) | Visuals4 (thousands) | Papers5 (thousands) |
#AHA17 | 06/29/17 | 62.0 | 42.4 | 17.4 | 339.1 | 44.5 | 17.7 |
#ACC18 | 12/11/17 | 51.4 | 35.6 | 10.1 | 372.5 | 42.2 | 14.8 |
#ESC18 | 12/29/17 | 54.5 | 20.0 | 23.8 | 137.5 | 17.9 | 4.6 |
Another motive to be involved in social media is to reach a good knowledge about the current scientific research and discuss it with peers, maybe the discussion in social media could increment the citations of the papers or even to increase the impact of the author in the community when they discuss directly their research[12,13]. In the last years, many journals are adopting a strategy to spread the journal content through social media[14]. New ways to measuring the impact metrics of the research publi-cations through social media are used now, one of the best examples Altmetrics[15], that maybe could compete with the classic impact factor in the future.
Another interesting social media tool that needs to be mentioned is Youtube, as the second common search engine after Google. Many journals or scientific societies are using it for the dissemination of content and interaction with their potential audience[16].
If you are an academic leader probably you need to embrace the social media tools as there is a need for leadership on the social media discussions; the classic leaders are reluctant to abandon the typical forums of debate and the discussion it will be not there again, the audience is worldwide and the way to discuss is quickly changing[17,18].
For sure the future research will be about social media use, and it will focus on the impact on public health and the education of patients without any doubt. It is not noise it is a great opportunity[19-21].
The scientific societies considered more innovative are promoting these tools between their members. These new concepts need to be known by the cardiologists in training or fully stablished to stay updated, as countless information is moving rapidly through these channels. Do as the cardiology leadership is doing and don´t stay away from social media, there are more benefits than threats there[22].
Manuscript source: Invited manuscript
Specialty type: Cardiac and cardiovascular systems
Country of origin: Spain
Peer-review report classification
Grade A (Excellent): 0
Grade B (Very good): 0
Grade C (Good): C, C, C
Grade D (Fair): D
Grade E (Poor): 0
P-Reviewer: Kharlamov AN, Najafi M, Teragawa H, Ueda H S-Editor: Ma RY L-Editor:A E-Editor: Xing YX
1. | Grajales FJ, Sheps S, Ho K, Novak-Lauscher H, Eysenbach G. Social media: a review and tutorial of applications in medicine and health care. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:e13. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 373] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 356] [Article Influence: 32.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Parwani P, Choi AD, Lopez-Mattei J, Raza S, Chen T, Narang A, Michos ED, Erwin JP, Mamas MA, Gulati M. Understanding Social Media: Opportunities for Cardiovascular Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:1089-1093. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 71] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 78] [Article Influence: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | Snipelisky D. Social Media in Medicine: A Podium Without Boundaries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:2459-2461. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Mandrola J. RESPONSE: The Necessity of Social Media Literacy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:2461. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
5. | Alraies MC, Raza S, Ryan J. Twitter as a New Core Competency for Cardiologists. Circulation. 2018;138:1287-1289. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
6. | Alraies MC, Sahni S. Why cardiologists should be on social media - the value of online engagement. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2017;15:889-890. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Widmer RJ, Larsen CM. Call for FITs/ECs to Become Engaged With Social Media. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:422-425. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
8. | Wong K, Swamy L, Jardine LDA. #TipsForNewDocs: Mentoring From Miles Away. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9:674-675. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Barreto JE, Whitehair CL. Social Media and Web Presence for Patients and Professionals: Evolving Trends and Implications for Practice. PM R. 2017;9:S98-S105. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 42] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34] [Article Influence: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
10. | Hudson S, Mackenzie G. 'Not your daughter's Facebook': Twitter use at the European Society of Cardiology Conference 2018. Heart. 2019;105:169-170. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25] [Article Influence: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
11. | Tanoue MT, Chatterjee D, Nguyen HL, Sekimura T, West BH, Elashoff D, Suh WH, Han JK. Tweeting the Meeting. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018;11:e005018. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 20] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23] [Article Influence: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Capodanno D. Twitterature. EuroIntervention. 2018;14:e959-e961. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | Serruys PW, Onuma Y. Twitterature: will social media have an impact on scientific journals? EuroIntervention. 2018;14:e962-e964. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
14. | Ladeiras-Lopes R. New from ESC: ESC Journals Twitter. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:3340. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
15. | Crotty D. Altmetrics. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2647-2648. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
16. | Smith AA. YouTube your science. Nature. 2018;556:397-398. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
17. | Pawar S, Siddiqui G, Desai NR, Ahmad T. The Twittersphere Needs Academic Cardiologists!: #heartdisease #No1Killer #beyondjournals. JACC Heart Fail. 2018;6:172-173. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
18. | Yeh RW. Academic Cardiology and Social Media: Navigating the Wisdom and Madness of the Crowd. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018;11:e004736. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27] [Article Influence: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
19. | Redfern J, Ingles J, Neubeck L, Johnston S, Semsarian C. Tweeting our way to cardiovascular health. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1657-1658. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 27] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
20. | Turakhia MP, Harrington RA. Twitter and Cardiovascular Disease: Useful Chirps or Noisy Chatter? JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1:1036-1037. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
21. | Gouda P, Das D, Clark A, Ezekowitz JA. The Impact and Implications of Twitter for Cardiovascular Medicine. J Card Fail. 2017;23:266-267. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
22. | Walsh MN. Social Media and Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:1044-1047. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 22] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27] [Article Influence: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
23. | Symplur Signals. 2019; [accessed 2019 May]. Available from: https://www.symplur.com/signals/. [Cited in This Article: ] |