Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Cardiol. Mar 26, 2016; 8(3): 293-301
Published online Mar 26, 2016. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v8.i3.293
Figure 1
Figure 1 Flow chart. 1Different data from one study has been included in both the MI and RP analysis. MI: Type 1 spontaneous myocardial infarction; RP: Successful reperfusion during an acute myocardial infarction; PCI: Type 4 myocardial infarction associated with percutaneous coronary intervention; CABG: Type 5 myocardial infarction associated with coronary artery bypass surgery.
Figure 2
Figure 2 The pooled mean with confidence interval of standardized troponin for the different time points for type 1 spontaneous myocardial infarction. The number of articles per time point with a conventional Tn test/the number of articles with a HS-Tn test, and the number of test values (conventional Tn tests/HS-tests) are shown below the graph. Tn: Troponin; HS: High sensitive.
Figure 3
Figure 3 The pooled mean with confidence interval of standardized troponin for the different time points for successful reperfusion after acute myocardial infarction. The number of articles per time point with a conventional Tn test/the number of articles with a HS-Tn test, and the number of test values (conventional Tn tests/HS-tests) are shown below the graph. Tn: Troponin; HS: High sensitive.
Figure 4
Figure 4 The pooled mean with confidence interval of standardized troponin for type 5 myocardial infarction associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. Time points with only one data source were excluded. The number of articles per time point with a conventional Tn test/the number of articles with a HS-Tn test, and the number of test values (conventional Tn tests/HS-tests) are shown below the graph. Tn: Troponin; HS: High sensitive.