Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Cardiol. May 26, 2022; 14(5): 319-328
Published online May 26, 2022. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v14.i5.319
Published online May 26, 2022. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v14.i5.319
Figure 1 Flowchart depicting study selection for inclusion in the meta-analysis.
Figure 2 Primary outcomes – adenosine versus regadenoson cumulative.
A: correlation coefficient for fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements; B: Mean difference in FFR measures. CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 3 Secondary outcomes.
A: Adverse event rates; B: Time to achieve fractional flow reserve (FFR) with adenosine versus regadenoson induced hyperemia for FFR measurement. CI: Confidence interval.
- Citation: Gill GS, Gadre A, Kanmanthareddy A. Comparative efficacy and safety of adenosine and regadenoson for assessment of fractional flow reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Cardiol 2022; 14(5): 319-328
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v14/i5/319.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v14.i5.319