Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Cardiol. Nov 26, 2022; 14(11): 576-598
Published online Nov 26, 2022. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v14.i11.576
Figure 1
Figure 1 Time trends in the number of hospital discharges (total, with and without atrial fibrillation diagnosis); discharges with atrial fibrillation were further divided into the main or secondary diagnosis. AF: Atrial fibrillation.
Figure 2
Figure 2  Study flowchart.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Prevalence of different antithrombotic treatments as a percentage of total antithrombotic treatments. ASA: Acetylsalicylic acid; LMWH: Low molecular weight heparin.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Time trends over three-year periods (from 2010-2012 to 2019-2021) of the prevalence of different antithrombotic treatments as a percentage of total antithrombotic treatments. LMWH: Low molecular weight heparin.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Time trends by year (from 2010 to 2021) in prescription of different antithrombotic treatments (absolute number). APT: Antiplatelet treatment; VKA: vitamin K antagonist; DOAC: Direct oral anticoagulant; OAT: Oral antithrombotic therapy; TAT: Triple antithrombotic therapy; DAT: Double antithrombotic therapy.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Time trends by year (from 2010 to 2021) in prescription of different antithrombotic treatments (as a percentage of total patients). APT: Antiplatelet treatment; VKA: vitamin K antagonist; DOAC: Direct oral anticoagulant; OAT: Oral antithrombotic therapy; TAT: Triple antithrombotic therapy; DAT: Double antithrombotic therapy.