Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Cardiol. Apr 26, 2021; 13(4): 82-94
Published online Apr 26, 2021. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v13.i4.82
Published online Apr 26, 2021. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v13.i4.82
Figure 1 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram.
Figure 2 Risk of bias assessment of included studies using risk of bias in non-randomized studies-of interventions tool.
Figure 3 Forest plots comparing dabigatran with warfarin regarding hazard ratios of ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal bleeding.
HR: Hazard ratio; CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 4 Forest plots comparing rivaroxaban with warfarin regarding hazard ratio of ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal bleeding.
HR: Hazard ratio; CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 5 Forest plots comparing apixaban with warfarin regarding hazard ratio of ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding.
HR: Hazard ratio; CI: Confidence interval.
- Citation: Li WJ, Archontakis-Barakakis P, Palaiodimos L, Kalaitzoglou D, Tzelves L, Manolopoulos A, Wang YC, Giannopoulos S, Faillace R, Kokkinidis DG. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban are superior to warfarin in Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: An updated meta-analysis. World J Cardiol 2021; 13(4): 82-94
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v13/i4/82.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v13.i4.82