Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2016; 8(9): 627-633
Published online Sep 27, 2016. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i9.627
Table 1 Adhesive score
Adhesive score
0: No adhesions
1: Extremely soft adhesions
2: Stronger adhesions, but dissectible with dull dissection
3: Stronger adhesions only dissectible with sharpen tools
4: Stenosis
Table 2 Histopathologic Biert’ scheme
ParametersScore
0123
NecrosisNoSmall patchesLarge patchesMassive
PMNsNormalSlightly increasedStrong infiltrationMassive infiltration
LymphocytesNormalSlightly increasedStrong infiltrationMassive infiltration
MacrophagesNormalSlightly increasedStrong infiltrationMassive infiltration
EdemaNoSlightStrongMassive
EpitheliumGlandular normalCubic normalCubic incompleteAbsent
Submucosa-muscularGood bridgesMild bridgesFew bridgesBridges absent
AngiogenesisExtensiveStrongSlightAbsent
FibrosisExtensiveStrongSlightAbsent
Table 3 Intra-abdominal adhesion score in survivorings animals
Mann-Whitney mean rangesP value
Survivors (15 d vs 30 d)25.11 vs 11.120.0012
Control (15 d vs 30 d)10.53 vs 5.50.017
TachoSil (15 d vs 30 d)14.75 vs 6.250.001
Control vs TachoSil (15 d)9.5 vs 10.450.685
Control vs TachoSil (30 d)9.71 vs 8.500.584
Table 4 Most relevant parameters in histopathologic analysis (mean ± SD)
ControlTachoSilP value
PMNs0.21 ± 0.420.78 ± 0.640.010
Macrophages0.50 ± 0.650.89 ± 0.470.026
Edema0.43 ± 0.640.94 ± 0.630.017
Epithelium regeneration0.64 ± 0.921.11 ± 0.580.031