Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2016; 8(6): 444-451
Published online Jun 27, 2016. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i6.444
Published online Jun 27, 2016. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i6.444
Table 1 Co-morbidity and possible risk factors
Symptoms | n (%) |
Abdominal pain | 80 (100) |
Dyspepsia | 65 (81) |
Heart burn | 29 (36) |
Dysphagia | 17 (21) |
Palpable mass | 7 (9) |
Co-morbidity | |
Helicobacter pylori | 66 (83) |
Smokers | 56 (70) |
Diabetes mellitus | 16 (20) |
Hypertension | 16 (20) |
Total | 80 (100) |
Table 2 Preoperative endoscopic evaluation
Item | n (%) |
Site of tumor: | |
Antrum | 51 (64) |
Body | 19 (24) |
Fundus | 10 (12) |
Macroscopic feature: | |
Exophytic growth | 46 (58) |
Ulcerative form | 34 (42) |
Diffuse form | 0 |
Total | 80 (100) |
Table 3 Complications after gastrectomy
n (%) | |
Anastomotic leakage | 3 (4) |
Internal hemorrhage | 1 (1) |
Splenic bed collection | 2 (3) |
Pleural effusion | 2 (3) |
Wound infection | 2 (3) |
Total | 10 (13) |
Table 4 Pattern of recurrence
Item | n (%) |
Local recurrence | 9 (11) |
Lymph nodes metastasis | 2 (3) |
Liver metastasis | 2 (3) |
Total | 13 (16) |
Table 5 Demographic and clinicopathological features predicting overall survival
Characteristics | Number of patients n (%) | Months after surgery (mean ± SD) | P value |
Sex | |||
Male | 57 (71) | 50.2 ± 3.1 | |
Female | 23 (29) | 47.8 ± 4.6 | P = 0.830 |
Age | |||
Below 60 | 49 (61) | 47.3 ± 3.5 | |
Above 60 | 31 (39) | 53.6 ± 3.6 | P = 0.259 |
Site | |||
Antrum | 51 (64) | 47 ± 3.5 | |
Body | 19 (24) | 57.2 ± 3.5 | |
Fundus | 10 (12) | 40.3 ± 6 | P = 0.315 |
Type of surgery | |||
Total gastrectomy | 30 | 65 ± 7 | |
Subtotal gastrectomy | 50 | 60 | P = 0.548 |
Tumor differentiation | |||
Well | 37 (46) | 65.6 ± 0.3 | |
Moderate | 20 (25) | 50.8 ± 5.3 | |
Poor | 23 (29) | 20.8 ± 4 | P = 0.001 |
T stage | |||
T1 | 10 (13) | 60 ± 3.2 | |
T2 | 25 (31) | 60 ± 2.4 | |
T3 | 29 (36) | 61 ± 3 | |
T4 | 16 (20) | 12 ± 2.3 | P = 0.001 |
LN ratio | |||
0 | 7 (9) | 61 | |
≤ 0.2 | 20 (25) | 62 ± 2.5 | |
0.2-0.4 | 26 (32) | 62 ± 2.1 | |
> 0.4 | 27 (34) | 22 ± 4.5 | P < 0.001 |
LN status | |||
Negative | 7 (9) | 61 ± 3.5 | |
Positive | 73 (91) | 31 ± 2.3 | P = 0.03 |
Number of examined LN | |||
> 15 | 65 (81) | 54.48 ± 2.6 | |
≤ 15 | 15 (19) | 14.5 ± 1 | P < 0.001 |
Surgical margin | |||
Negative | 73 (91) | 53.8 + 2.4 | |
Positive | 7 (9) | 9.5 + 1 | P < 0.001 |
Recurrence | |||
No | 67 (84) | 57.3 + 2.3 | |
Yes | 13 (16) | 12.3 + 1.2 | P < 0.001 |
Table 6 Multivariate analysis
Factors | Odds ratio | CI lower-upper | P value |
Tumor differentiation | 0.142 | 0.045-1.092 | 0.044 |
Radicality of resection | 2.57 | 1.4-5.1 | 0.001 |
Number of resected lymph node > 15 | 2.04 | 1.3-3.75 | 0.001 |
Table 7 Published series on prognostic factors after resection for gastric carcinoma
Ref. | Period | No. | Gender | Age | Location | No. excised NL | LN ratio | T stage | Histologic type | N stage | Curative resection |
Adachi et al[45] | 1977-1987 | 479 | NS | NS | P < 0.01 | P < 0.01 | NR | P < 0.01 | P < 0.01 | P < 0.01 | NR |
Bando et al[27] | 1974-1995 | 650 | NR | NR | NR | P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 | NS | NR | NR |
Yokota et al[46] | 1985-1995 | 926 | NS 0.347 | NS 0.099 | P < 0.0001 | NR | NR | P < 0.0001 | P < 0.0001 | P < 0.0001 | NR |
Angelov et al[47] | 2005-2013 | 101 | NS 0.587 | NS 0.67 | NS 0.54 | NR | NR | NR | NR 0.169 | P = 0.003 | P < 0.001 |
Basaran et al[48] | 2006-2014 | 228 | NS | P < 0.0001 | P < 0.001 | NR | NR | NS 0.137 | P < 0.015 | P < 0.002 | P = 0.000 |
Present study | 2009-2013 | 80 | NS 0.83 | NS 0.259 | NS 0.315 | P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 | P = 0.001 | P = 0.001 | NR | P < 0.001 |
- Citation: El Hanafy E, El Nakeeb A, Ezzat H, Hamdy E, Atif E, Kandil T, Fouad A, Wahab MA, Monier A. How does epidemiological and clinicopathological features affect survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients-single Egyptian center experience. World J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 8(6): 444-451
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v8/i6/444.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v8.i6.444