Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2016; 8(3): 266-273
Published online Mar 27, 2016. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i3.266
Table 1 Studies of fibrin sealant at pilonidal sinus: Demographics of the patients
Ref.YearCountryStudy periodNo.MaleAgeBMI or weight
Greenberg et al[4]2004IsraelJun 2001 to Dec 2001302223.5 ± 2.8 (17-44)NA
Lund et al[5]2005United KingdomNA6628.5 ± 5.5 (22-44)NA
Seleem et al[6]2005Saudi ArabiaSep 2001 to Feb 2004252326.4 ± 8.5 (17-50)NA
Patti et al[7]2006ItalyNA8821.8 ± 6.5NA
Altinli et al[8]2007TurkeyJan 2003 to Jan 2004161624.5 ± 6.025.7 + 4.1 kg/m2
Sözen et al[9]2011TurkeyJan 2008 to Mar 2008252522.5 ± 4.0 (20-36)26 kg/m2
Elsey et al[10]2013United KingdomMar 2007 to Sep 2011574226.0 ± 13.3 (17–70)NA
Isik et al[11]2014TurkeyDec 2007 to Dec 2011403224.0 ± 8.5 (16-50)NA
Smith et al[12]2014United KingdomAug 2006 to Dec 201310NA14.5 ± 1.0 (12–16)73 kg
TotalJun 2001 to Dec 201321784%24.2 ± 7.8 (12-70)
Table 2 Studies of fibrin sealant at pilonidal sinus: Features of the pilonidal sinuses
Ref.No.Inclusion and exclusion criteriaRecurrent
Greenberg et al[4]30No exclusion criteria8
Lund et al[5]63-4 openings and no large cavity3
Seleem et al[6]251-3 openings, no prior surgery, no infection0
Patti et al[7]83 < openings, no prior surgery, no infection, no large cavity or distant orifice0
Altinli et al[8]16No prior surgery0
Sözen et al[9]25No prior surgery, no infection, no lateral extension < 3 cm0
Elsey et al[10]57No infection, no very scarred cases due to repeated episodes or surgeries2
Isik et al[11]40Only 1 opening, no prior surgical or medical treatment, no infection0
Smith et al[12]10No exclusion criteria0
Total21713 (6%)
Table 3 Studies of fibrin sealant at pilonidal sinus: Procedures
Ref.No.Surgical procedureAim of using fibrin sealant
Greenberg et al[4]30Excision and primary closureObliterate the dead space under the wound
Lund et al[5]6No sinus excision, only cleaning the tractsFill the tracts with sealent
Seleem et al[6]25Excision and lay openOverlap the open wound with sealent
Patti et al[7]8Excision and lay openOverlap the open wound with sealent
Altinli et al[8]16Excision and closure with Limberg flapObliterate the dead space under the wound
Sözen et al[9]25Excision and closure with Karydakis flapObliterate the dead space under the wound
Elsey et al[10]57No sinus excision, only cleaning the tractsFill the tracts with sealent
Isik et al[11]40No sinus excision, only cleaning the tractsFill the tracts with sealent
Smith et al[12]10No sinus excision, only cleaning the tractsFill the tracts with sealent
Table 4 Surgical details
Ref.No.AnesthesiaAmount of glueDrain
Greenberg et al[4]30General or spinal2-4 mLNone
Lund et al[5]6General1-2 mLNone
Seleem et al[6]25Local (n = 23), general (n = 2)NANone
Patti et al[7]8Local1.9 ± 0.6 mLNone
Altinli et al[8]16Spinal6 mLYes
Sözen et al[9]25NA6 mLNone
Elsey et al[10]57GeneralNANone
Isik et al[11]40Local2-4 mLNone
Smith et al[12]10GeneralNANone
Total217Local 39%3.8 (1-6)7.3%
Table 5 Obliterating the dead space under the closed wound with sealent
Ref.No.Closure methodReturn to normal activitiesComplicationsMean follow-up (mo)Recurrence
Greenberg et al[4]30Primary11.0 + 6.0 dPurulent discharge (n = 4)23.0 ± 3.0None
Altinli et al[8]16LimbergNANone8.5None
Sözen et al[9]25KarydakisNAFluid collection (n = 6)10.2None
Total6110 (16.4%)15.2None
Table 6 Studies on covering the open wound with fibrin sealant after excision
Ref.No.Healing timeMorbiditySatisfactionRecurrence
Seleem et al[6]252 wk184%None
Patti et al[7]825.8 ± 13.2 d1100%None
Total3316.9 d2 (6%)88%None
Table 7 Studies on filling the tracts with fibrin sealant
Ref.No.Work offMorbidityPainFollow-up
Lund et al[5]6NANoneNone18 mo
Elsey et al[10]57Median 6NoneNone23 mo
Isik et al[11]40Mean 2.0 ± 1.0None3218 mo
Smith et al[12]10NA1 (infection)132 mo
Total113Usually < 70.9%33 (29%)21.7 mo