Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2016; 8(10): 700-705
Published online Oct 27, 2016. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i10.700
Published online Oct 27, 2016. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i10.700
WPF group | PEF group | P-value | |
n | 40 | 32 | |
Gender (Male/Female) | 23/17 | 19/13 | 0.873 |
Feeding route (PEG1/NG2) | 2/38 | 3-29 | 0.468 |
Major diagnoses | |||
Esophageal cancer | 4 | 5 | 0.473 |
Colon cancer | 22 | 16 | 0.673 |
Gastric cancer (subtotal gastrectomy) | 2 | 3 | 0.468 |
Bile duct cancer | 4 | 2 | 0.567 |
Ischemic bowel | 8 | 6 | 0.894 |
Age | 67.5 ± 10.5 | 64.7 ± 10.1 | 0.263 |
APACHE II score | 11.6 ± 2.3 | 12.4 ± 2.6 | 0.201 |
Ventilator dependence, n (%) | 15 (37.5) | 13 (40.6) | 0.787 |
Body mass index | 22.3 ± 2.1 | 21.9 ± 2.2 | 0.398 |
WPF group | PEF group | P-value | |
Albumin (g/dL) | |||
POD1-1 | 2.59 ± 0.21 | 2.57 ± 0.19 | 0.652 |
POD-5 | 2.60 ± 0.26 | 2.68 ± 0.28 | 0.198 |
POD-10 | 2.70 ± 0.30 | 2.89 ± 0.27 | 0.010 |
Prealbumin (mg/dL) | |||
POD-1 | 11.1 ± 1.4 | 10.6 ± 1.3 | 0.201 |
POD-5 | 11.6 ± 1.2 | 12.8 ± 2.1 | 0.006 |
POD-10 | 12.9 ± 1.7 | 15.1 ± 1.5 | < 0.001 |
TLC2 (cell/mm3) | |||
POD-1 | 1069 ± 135 | 1077 ± 148 | 0.801 |
POD-5 | 1082 ± 149 | 1192 ± 168 | 0.012 |
POD-10 | 1231 ± 162 | 1311 ± 182 | 0.052 |
CRP3 (mg/L) | |||
POD-1 | 43.7 ± 7.8 | 43.0± 9.4 | 0.742 |
POD-5 | 32.7 ± 4.9 | 33.4 ± 5.2 | 0.824 |
POD-10 | 19.7 ± 5.0 | 18.5 ± 5.4 | 0.416 |
WPF group | PEF group | P-value | |
Length of stay in the ICU1 (d) | 6.8 ± 1.5 | 6.2 ± 0.8 | 0.047 |
Maximum caloric intake during ICU stay (kcal/kg) | 22.5 ± 1.9 | 23.2 ± 2.4 | 0.063 |
Caloric intake (kcal/kg body weight/d) | |||
POD2-5 | 20.7 ± 2.3 | 21.5 ± 1.7 | 0.116 |
POD-10 | 23.5 ± 2.4 | 25.1 ± 2.9 | 0.010 |
Maximum GRV3 during ICU stay (mL) | 183.6 ± 88.0 | 138.0 ± 63.9 | 0.016 |
Prevalence of suspended feeding due to high GRV (%) | 21.8 | 15.2 | 0.071 |
Prevalence of diarrhea (%) | 19.9 | 13.2 | 0.056 |
Prevalence of pneumonia (%) | 5 | 3.1 | 0.692 |
- Citation: Liu MY, Tang HC, Hu SH, Chang SJ. Peptide-based enteral formula improves tolerance and clinical outcomes in abdominal surgery patients relative to a whole protein enteral formula. World J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 8(10): 700-705
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v8/i10/700.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v8.i10.700