Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2016; 8(10): 700-705
Published online Oct 27, 2016. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i10.700
Table 1 Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics between the whole-protein formula group and the dipeptide- and tripeptide-based formula group
WPF groupPEF groupP-value
n4032
Gender (Male/Female)23/1719/130.873
Feeding route (PEG1/NG2)2/383-290.468
Major diagnoses
Esophageal cancer450.473
Colon cancer22160.673
Gastric cancer (subtotal gastrectomy)230.468
Bile duct cancer420.567
Ischemic bowel860.894
Age67.5 ± 10.564.7 ± 10.10.263
APACHE II score11.6 ± 2.312.4 ± 2.60.201
Ventilator dependence, n (%)15 (37.5)13 (40.6)0.787
Body mass index22.3 ± 2.121.9 ± 2.20.398
Table 2 Differences in nutritional status between the whole-protein formula group and the dipeptide- and tripeptide-based formula group
WPF groupPEF groupP-value
Albumin (g/dL)
POD1-12.59 ± 0.212.57 ± 0.190.652
POD-52.60 ± 0.262.68 ± 0.280.198
POD-102.70 ± 0.302.89 ± 0.270.010
Prealbumin (mg/dL)
POD-111.1 ± 1.410.6 ± 1.30.201
POD-511.6 ± 1.212.8 ± 2.10.006
POD-1012.9 ± 1.715.1 ± 1.5< 0.001
TLC2 (cell/mm3)
POD-11069 ± 1351077 ± 1480.801
POD-51082 ± 1491192 ± 1680.012
POD-101231 ± 1621311 ± 1820.052
CRP3 (mg/L)
POD-143.7 ± 7.843.0± 9.40.742
POD-532.7 ± 4.933.4 ± 5.20.824
POD-1019.7 ± 5.018.5 ± 5.40.416
Table 3 Clinical outcomes for the whole-protein formula group and the dipeptide- and tripeptide-based formula group
WPF groupPEF groupP-value
Length of stay in the ICU1 (d)6.8 ± 1.56.2 ± 0.80.047
Maximum caloric intake during ICU stay (kcal/kg)22.5 ± 1.923.2 ± 2.40.063
Caloric intake (kcal/kg body weight/d)
POD2-520.7 ± 2.321.5 ± 1.70.116
POD-1023.5 ± 2.425.1 ± 2.90.010
Maximum GRV3 during ICU stay (mL)183.6 ± 88.0138.0 ± 63.90.016
Prevalence of suspended feeding due to high GRV (%)21.815.20.071
Prevalence of diarrhea (%)19.913.20.056
Prevalence of pneumonia (%)53.10.692