Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. Sep 27, 2015; 7(9): 203-207
Published online Sep 27, 2015. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i9.203
Table 1 Demographic data and results of the different scores
Incontinent patientsControl patients
Number of patients53208
Age (mean ± SD)61.55 ± 12.4958.41 ± 18.41
RAFIS state (mean ± SD)6.91 ± 2.370
RAFIS leaks (mean ± SD)7.25 ± 2.480
RAFIS global (mean ± SD)14.15 ± 4.090
Jorge-wexner score (mean ± SD)13.32 ± 4.950
FIQL test lifestyle (mean ± SD)2.99 ± 0.964.99 ± 0.06
FIQL test coping/behaviour (mean ± SD)2.48 ± 0.954.99 ± 0.06
FIQL test depression (mean ± SD)3.23 ± 1.634.20 ± 0.84
FIQL test embarassment (mean ± SD)2.59 ± 0.955 ± 0
Table 2 External validity of the score compared with Jorge-Wexner score and faecal incontinence quality of life scale questionnaire
Correlation
RAFIS global - Jorge-Wexner score0.98b
RAFIS global - FIQL test lifestyle- 0.87b
RAFIS global - FIQL test coping/behaviour- 0.91b
RAFIS global - FIQL test depression-0.36b
RAFIS global - FIQL test embarassment-0.90b
Table 3 Multivariate analysis
RAFIS global0.96
Jorge-Wexner score0.96
FIQL test lifestyle-0.95
FIQL test coping/behaviour-0.97
FIQL test depression-0.47
FIQL test embarrassment-0.97