Leake PA, Pitzul K, Roberts PO, Plummer JM. Comparative analysis of open and laparoscopic colectomy for malignancy in a developing country. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2013; 5(11): 294-299 [PMID: 24520427 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i11.294]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Dr. Pierre-Anthony Leake, Department of Surgery, Radiology, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica. paeleake@yahoo.com
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Brief Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. Nov 27, 2013; 5(11): 294-299 Published online Nov 27, 2013. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i11.294
Table 1 Demographics for open colectomy and laparoscopic colectomy for colonic carcinoma n (%)
OC
LC
P value
Gender
Male
36 (41.4)
9 (52.9)
0.429
Female
51 (58.6)
8 (47.1)
Age [median, (5Q-75Q)], yr
66 (59-78)
62 (58-72)
0.363
Charlson score
0
7 (8.0)
1 (6.2)
0.501
1
14 (16.1)
4 (25.0)
2
22 (25.3)
4 (25.0)
3
18 (20.7)
5 (31.2)
4
17 (19.5)
1 (6.2)
5
7 (8.0)
0 (0.0)
6
1 (1.1)
1 (6.2)
7
1 (1.1)
0 (0.0)
Table 2 Intra-operative outcomes for open colectomy and laparoscopic colectomy for colonic carcinoma n (%)
OC
LC
P value
Procedure
RH
42 (48.3)
7 (41.2)
0.801
Extended RH
9 (10.3)
1 (5.9)
LH
11 (12.6)
2 (11.8)
Extended LH
1 (1.1)
0 (0.0)
Transversecolectomy
1 (1.1)
0 (0.0)
Sigmoidcolectomy
21 (24.1)
6 (35.3)
Totalcolectomy
2 (2.3)
1 (5.9)
Conversion
NA
1 (5.9)
Total OR time (min)[median (25Q-75Q)]
165 (128-195)
195 (143-259)
0.075
Intraop blood loss (mL)[median (25Q-75Q)]
300 (200-600)
275 (188-550)
0.512
Table 3 Pathological outcomes for open colectomy and laparoscopic colectomy for colonic carcinoma n (%)
OC
LC
P value
Grade ofdifferentiation
Well
9 (10.35)
4 (23.5)
0.166
Moderate
74 (85.1)
10 (58.8)
Poor
4 (4.6)
0 (0.0)
Proximal margin (cm)[median (25Q-75Q)]
10 (5-16)
7 (7-10)
0.353
Distal margin (cm)[median (25Q-75Q)]
8 (4-13)
8 (6-10)
0.570
CRM involved
Yes
9 (10.6)
0 (0.0)
0.348
No
76 (89.4)
16 (100)
LN yield [median(25Q-75Q)]
14 (10-17)
14 (10-15)
0.619
Table 4 Postoperative outcomes for open colectomy and laparoscopic colectomy for colonic carcinoma n (%)
OC
LC
P value
30-d morbidity
No
46 (52.9)
8 (47.1)
0.774
Yes
22 (25.3)
6 (35.3)
Not recorded
19 (21.8)
3 (17.6)
30-d mortality
No
62 (71.3)
14 (82.4)
0.717
Yes
6 (6.9)
0 (0.0)
Not recorded
19 (21.8)
3 (17.6)
Parenteral narcotic doses[median (25Q-75Q)]
6 (4-9)
5 (4-7)
0.176
LOS (d) [median (25Q-75Q)]
6 (5-7)
5 (4-8)
0.083
Citation: Leake PA, Pitzul K, Roberts PO, Plummer JM. Comparative analysis of open and laparoscopic colectomy for malignancy in a developing country. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2013; 5(11): 294-299