Editorial
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2012; 4(3): 45-54
Published online Mar 27, 2012. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v4.i3.45
Table 1 Sackett's classification of the level of evidence according to the modification of Heinrich et al[10,11]
Level of evidenceType of trialCriteria for classificationGrade of recommendation
ILarge randomized trials with clear-cut results (and low error risk)Sample size calculation provided and fulfilled; study endpoint providedA
IISmall randomized trials with uncertain results (and moderate to high error risk)Matched analysis, sample size calculation not given or not fulfilled; study endpoints not provided; convincing comparative studiesB
IIINonrandomized, contemporaneous controlsNoncomparative, prospectiveC
IVNonrandomized, historical controlsRetrospective analysis, cohort studies-
VV No control, case series only; experts opinionsSmall series, review articles-
Table 2 Current grade I A recommendations for non-metastatic gastric cancer surgery
TopicRecommendationRef.
Traditional controversies
Extension of resectionSubtotal gastrectomy with 5 cm negative margins is sufficient for the curative treatment of distal tumors[1]
Prophylactic splenectomy is not necessary for cardia tumors either[25-27]
Extension of lymphadenectomyD2 nodal dissection with spleno-pancreasectomy does not provide any survival benefit and increases post-operative morbidity and mortality rates[2-3]
Pancreas-preserving D2 nodal dissection increases survival rates without any significant post-operative morbidity and mortality[44]
Para-aortic nodal dissection (in addition to D2 lymphadenectomy) does not improve the survival rate in curable diasease[45]
Surgery in multimodal strategy
Pre-operative chemotherapyPre-operative chemotherapy is associated to an increase in survival rates[121,122]
Table 3 Ongoing phase-III RCTs concerning non-metastatic gastric cancer surgery (from the trials registry of the United States National Institutes of Health; http://www.clinicaltrial.gov)
TopicTitle of trialInstitutionEstimated enrollmentStudy start yearRegistration identifier
Traditional controversies
Extension of resectionGCSSG-SPNX: Trial to Evaluate Splenectomy in Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Carcinoma: JCOG0110Japan Clinical Oncology Group-Japan5002002NCT00112099[28]
Extension of lymphadenectomyA Comparison Between D1 and D2 Lymphadenectomy in Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Controlled TrialTata Memorial Hospital-India6002007NCT00447746[46]
Minimally invasive approach
Laparoscopic resectionProspective Randomized Trial of Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy (LADG) Versus Open Distal Gastrectomy (ODG) in Patients With Early Gastric Cancer (EGC)National Cancer Center-Korea1642003NCT00546468[100]
Multi-Institutional Prospective Randomized Trial on the Assessment of Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric CancerNational Cancer Center-Korea14002006NCT00452751[101]
Surgery in multimodal strategy
Pre-operative chemotherapyRandomized Phase III Trial of Surgery Plus Neoadjuvant TS-1 and Cisplatin Compared With Surgery Alone for Type 4 and Large Type 3 Gastric Cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG 0501)Japan Clinical Oncology Group-Japan3162005NCT00252161[123]
A Multicenter Randomized Phase III Trial of Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery and Chemotherapy or by Surgery and Chemoradiotherapy in Resectable Gastric Cancer (CRITICS Study)Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group-Netherlands7882006NCT00407186[125]
A Randomized Controlled Phase II/III Trial of Peri-Operative Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab in Operable Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach and Gastro Oesophageal JunctionMedical Research Council-United Kingdom11002007NCT00450203[124]