Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2025; 17(8): 105306
Published online Aug 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.105306
Published online Aug 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.105306
Table 1 Comparison of wound healing between the two patient groups, n (%)
Group | Case | Wound healing status | Wound healing time (days) | ||
Grade A healing | Grade B healing | Grade C healing | |||
Control | 80 | 42 (52.50) | 26 (32.50) | 12 (15.00) | 16.50 ± 2.50 |
Observation | 80 | 67 (83.75) | 5 (6.25) | 8 (10.00) | 14.50 ± 2.50 |
t/χ² | 17.989 | 17.644 | 0.914 | 5.060 | |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.339 | 0.000 |
Table 2 Comparison of psychosocial adaptations in the two groups
Group | Case | Social support | Self-life attitude | Acceptance | Efficacy | Self-respect | Anxiety/depression | ||||||
Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | ||
Control | 80 | 13.72 ± 2.30 | 20.53 ± 2.48 | 10.65 ± 1.82 | 16.05 ± 2.53 | 8.01 ± 1.26 | 12.65 ± 1.90 | 8.58 ± 1.71 | 12.25 ± 2.03 | 9.10 ± 1.35 | 11.51 ± 1.82 | 13.81 ± 2.42 | 18.20 ± 2.25 |
Observation | 80 | 14.12 ± 2.05 | 22.85 ± 2.34 | 10.91 ± 1.78 | 17.52 ± 2.71 | 8.12 ± 1.58 | 13.28 ± 2.03 | 8.34 ± 1.84 | 13.32 ± 2.21 | 8.79 ± 1.40 | 12.30 ± 1.53 | 14.03 ± 2.27 | 19.41 ± 2.61 |
t value | 1.161 | 6.086 | 0.913 | 3.546 | 0.487 | 2.027 | 0.855 | 3.189 | 1.426 | 2.972 | 0.593 | 3.141 | |
P value | 0.247 | 0.000 | 0.362 | 0.001 | 0.627 | 0.044 | 0.394 | 0.002 | 0.156 | 0.003 | 0.554 | 0.002 |
Table 3 Complication rates in both groups, n (%)
Group | Case | Bile leakage | Infection of incisional wound | Nausea and vomiting | Hepatorenal syndrome | Overall incidence of complications |
Control | 80 | 3 (3.75) | 5 (6.25) | 5 (6.25) | 3 (3.75) | 16 (20.00) |
Observation | 80 | 1 (1.25) | 1 (1.25) | 2 (2.50) | 1 (1.25) | 5 (6.25) |
χ² value | 6.632 | |||||
P value | 0.010 |
Table 4 Comparison of postoperative rehabilitation in the two groups
Group | Case | Evacuation time (hours) | Defecation time (hours) | Bed time (hours) | Length of stay (days) |
Control | 80 | 35.72 ± 5.15 | 45.30 ± 7.83 | 28.15 ± 5.22 | 16.26 ± 1.67 |
Observation | 80 | 22.35 ± 4.08 | 38.50 ± 6.21 | 20.05 ± 4.18 | 15.12 ± 1.35 |
t value | 18.201 | 6.086 | 10.834 | 4.748 | |
P value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Table 5 Comparison of quality of life in the two groups
Group | Case | Somatic function | Holistic health | Role function | Emotional function | Social function | Cognitive function |
Control | 80 | 63.20 ± 10.76 | 65.05 ± 11.12 | 64.15 ± 10.17 | 62.36 ± 9.08 | 60.01 ± 12.17 | 68.29 ± 13.21 |
Observation | 80 | 59.51 ± 11.14 | 59.11 ± 12.45 | 67.92 ± 11.76 | 66.09 ± 10.48 | 66.12 ± 13.09 | 63.18 ± 10.55 |
t value | 2.131 | 3.183 | 2.169 | 2.406 | 3.058 | 2.704 | |
P value | 0.035 | 0.002 | 0.032 | 0.017 | 0.003 | 0.008 |
- Citation: Shan YJ, Yu DF, Xu WY, Tu SQ, Ge YP. Effects of motivational and early warning nursing on wound healing and socio-psychological adaptability in hepatobiliary surgical patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(8): 105306
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i8/105306.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.105306