Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2025; 17(5): 107579
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.107579
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.107579
Table 1 Baseline characters of proximal and total gastrectomy groups after propensity score matching, n (%)
TG (n = 122) | PG (n = 122) | P value | |
Gender | 1.000 | ||
Male | 98 (80.3) | 98 (80.3) | |
Female | 24 (19.7) | 24 (19.7) | |
Age1, years | 63.00 (59.50-68.25) | 62.00 (58.00-67.00) | 0.453 |
BMI1, kg/m2 | 24.11 (21.44-25.91) | 23.40 (21.50-25.95) | 0.673 |
ASA score | 0.697 | ||
1-2 | 108 (88.5) | 106 (86.9) | |
3 | 14 (11.5) | 16 (13.1) | |
CCI score | 0.494 | ||
≤ 2 | 80 (65.6) | 85 (69.7) | |
> 2 | 42 (34.4) | 37 (30.3) | |
Tumor size1, cm | 3.00 (2.00-4.50) | 3.00 (2.00-4.00) | 0.771 |
Histologic differentiation | 0.324 | ||
Poor/other types | 72 (59.02) | 61 (50.00) | |
Moderate | 45 (36.89) | 53 (43.44) | |
Well | 13 (5.33) | 8 (6.56) | |
Number of lymph nodes retrieved1 | 31.00 (22.75-4100) | 32.50 (23.75-43.00) | 0.455 |
Number of lymph node metastasis1, n | 2.00 (0.00-8.00) | 2.00 (0.00-5.25) | 0.381 |
ypT stage | 0.269 | ||
ypT0 | 16 (13.11) | 19 (15.57) | |
ypT1a | 9 (7.38) | 4 (3.28) | |
ypT1b | 10 (8.20) | 5 (4.10) | |
ypT2 | 12 (9.84) | 18 (14.75) | |
ypT3 | 33 (27.05) | 25 (20.49) | |
ypT4a | 40 (32.79) | 50 (40.98) | |
ypT4b | 2 (1.64) | 1 (0.82) | |
ypN stage | 0.509 | ||
ypN0 | 49 (40.16) | 48 (39.34) | |
ypN1 | 21 (17.21) | 22 (18.03) | |
ypN2 | 21 (17.21) | 30 (24.59) | |
ypN3a | 24 (19.67) | 18 (14.75) | |
ypN3b | 7 (5.74) | 4 (3.28) | |
ypTNM stage | |||
0 | 20 (16.4) | 19 (15.6) | |
I | 9 (7.4) | 15 (12.3) | |
II | 40 (32.8) | 30 (24.6) | |
III | 53 (43.4) | 58 (47.5) | |
Vascular invasion | 0.328 | ||
No | 82 (67.2) | 89 (73.0) | |
Yes | 40 (32.8) | 33 (27.0) | |
Perineural invasion | 0.419 | ||
No | 77 (63.1) | 83 (68.0) | |
Yes | 45 (36.9) | 39 (32.0) | 1.000 |
Radical resection | |||
R0 | 121 (99.18) | 120 (98.36) | |
R1/R2 | 1 (0.82) | 2 (1.64) |
Table 2 Clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, n (%)
TG (n = 122) | PG (n = 122) | P value | |
NACT regimen | 0.778 | ||
SOX | 57 (46.72) | 61 (50.00) | |
CAPEOX | 15 (12.30) | 15 (12.30) | |
DOS | 20 (16.39) | 15 (12.30) | |
FLOT | 10 (8.20) | 15 (12.30) | |
FOLFOX | 5 (4.10) | 3 (2.46) | |
Other | 15 (12.30) | 13 (10.66) | |
NACT cycles | 0.251 | ||
1 | 4 (3.28) | 7 (5.74) | |
2 | 18 (14.75) | 14 (11.48) | |
3 | 37 (30.33) | 36 (29.51) | |
4 | 46 (37.70) | 56 (45.90) | |
6 | 13 (10.06) | 9 (7.38) | |
> 6 | 4 (3.28) | 7 (5.74) | |
TRG (Becker) | < 0.001 | ||
1a | 6 (4.92) | 21 (17.21) | |
1b | 19 (15.57) | 13 (10.66) | |
2 | 72 (59.02) | 30 (24.59) | |
3 | 25 (20.49) | 58 (47.54) | |
CR response | 0.005 | ||
CR | 4 (3.28) | 16 (13.11) | |
Non-CR | 118 (96.72) | 106 (86.89) | |
Plus immunotherapy | 0.797 | ||
Yes | 23 (18.85) | 30 (24.59) | |
No | 99 (81.15) | 92 (75.41) |
Table 3 Clinical outcomes of surgery and postoperative morbidity, n (%)
TG (n = 122) | PG (n = 122) | P value | |
Surgical approach | 0.915 | ||
Laparoscopic | 84 (68.85) | 81 (66.39) | |
Open | 30 (24.59) | 32 (26.23) | |
Robotic | 8 (6.56) | 9 (7.38) | |
Operation time1, minutes | 215 (195.00-248.75) | 189.50 (169.25-227.25) | < 0.001 |
Blood loss1, mL | 100.00 (100.00-200.00) | 100.00 (100.00-200.00) | 0.445 |
Hospitalization time1, days | 10.00 (9.00-12.00) | 11.00 (8.00-13.75) | 0.314 |
Postoperative complications | 0.792 | ||
No complications | 104 (85.25) | 98 (80.32) | 0.186 |
Anastomotic leakage | 2 (1.64) | 2 (1.64) | 1.000 |
Anastomotic stricture | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1.000 |
Bleeding | 2 (1.64) | 3 (2.46) | 1.000 |
Intrabdominal infection | 4 (3.28) | 4 (3.28) | 1.000 |
Gastroparesis | 1 (0.82) | 1 (0.82) | 1.000 |
Intestinal obstruction | 2 (1.64) | 3 (2.46) | 1.000 |
Pneumonia | 1 (0.82) | 2 (1.64) | 0.209 |
Pleural effusion | 6 (4.92) | 8 (6.56) | 0.518 |
Respiratory failure | 0 (0.00) | 1 (0.82) | 1.000 |
Clavien_Dindo classification | 0.543 | ||
≤ Grade II | 9 (7.38) | 15 (12.30) | |
Grade IIIa/IIIb | 8 (6.56) | 10 (8.20) | |
Grade IVa/IVb | 1 (0.82) | 1 (0.82) | |
Grade V | 104 (85.25) | 95 (77.87) | |
Adjuvant chemotherapy | 0.133 | ||
No | 34 (27.9) | 24 (19.7) | |
Yes | 88 (72.1) | 98 (80.3) |
Table 4 Postoperative reflux assessment, n (%)
TG (n = 122) | PG (n = 122) | P value | |
Reflux symptoms | 0.017 | ||
No | 84 (68.9) | 100 (82.0) | |
Yes | 38 (31.1) | 22 (18.0) | |
Gerd-Q score | < 0.001 | ||
< 8 | 96 (78.7) | 113 (92.6) | |
≥ 8 | 26 (21.3) | 9 (7.4) | |
Reflux esophagitis (Los Angeles Classification) | < 0.001 | ||
No reflux | 81 (66.4) | 100 (82.0) | |
A | 14 (11.5) | 15 (12.3) | |
B | 11 (9.0) | 6 (4.9) | |
C | 16 (9.0) | 1 (0.8) |
Table 5 Univariate Cox regression analysis for overall survival
Variables | Hazard ratio (95%CI) | P value |
Group | ||
PG | 1.00 (Reference) | |
TG | 1.15 (0.87-1.54) | 0.330 |
Histological differentiation | ||
Moderate/Well | 1.00 (Reference) | |
Poor/others | 3.60 (2.52-5.14) | < 0.001 |
Tumor size | ||
> 4 cm | 1.00 (Reference) | |
≤ 4 cm | 0.18 (0.12-0.27) | < 0.001 |
Gender | ||
Female | 1.00 (Reference) | |
Male | 0.88 (0.62-1.26) | |
Age | ||
> 70 | 1.00 (Reference) | |
≤ 70 | 0.77 (0.53-1.13) | |
BMI | ||
> 24 kg/m2 | 1.00 (Reference) | |
≤ 24 kg/m2 | 1.10 (0.83-1.47) | |
Clavien-Dindo Classification | ||
> Grade II | 1.00 (Reference) | |
≤ Grade II | 0.68 (0.42-1.11) | |
TRG | ||
> 1 | 1.00 (Reference) | |
≤ 1 | 0.95 (0.68-1.32) | |
NACT plus immunotherapy | ||
No | 1.00 (Reference) | |
Yes | 0.71 (0.53-0.94) | |
NACT regimens | ||
Others | 1.00 (Reference) | |
SOX | 0.97 (0.73-1.29) | |
NACT cycles | ||
> 4 | 1.00 (Reference) | |
≤ 4 | 0.83 (0.56-1.25) | |
Vascular invasion | ||
No | 1.00 (Reference) | |
Yes | 1.19 (0.87-1.63) | |
Perineural invasion | ||
No | 1.00 (Reference) | |
Yes | 1.34 (1.00-1.81) | |
CR response | ||
CR | 1.00 (Reference) | |
Non-CR | 1.25 (0.72-2.16) | |
Radical resection | ||
R0 | 1.00 (Reference) | |
R1 | 0.81 (0.20-3.29) | |
ypT Stage | ||
> T2 | 1.00 (Reference) | |
≤ T2 | 0.58 (0.43-0.79) | |
ypN Stage | ||
> N0 | 1.00 (Reference) | |
N0 | 0.68 (0.48-0.96) |
- Citation: Lu YM, Jin P, Wang HK, Shao XX, Hu HT, Jiang YJ, Li WY, Tian YT. Proximal gastrectomy with tubular stomach reconstruction vs total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A multicenter retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(5): 107579
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i5/107579.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.107579