Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2025; 17(2): 102342
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.102342
Table 1 Baseline data comparison
Characteristic
Control (n = 63)
Observation (n = 64)
t/χ2

P value
Gender--0.0650.797
Male3537--
Female2827--
Age (years), mean ± SD44.27 ± 9.6343.86 ± 9.870.2360.813
BMI (kg/m²)23.59 ± 1.8624.11 ± 1.741.6270.106
Duration (years), mean ± SD2.65 ± 0.842.72 ± 0.810.4780.633
Severity--0.4110.521
Mild2529--
Moderate3835--
Table 2 Clinical efficacy comparison
Group
n
Complete remission
Effective
Ineffective
Total effective rate (%)
Control6320301379.37%
Observation642733493.75%
χ2----5.666
P value----0.017
Table 3 Comparison of symptom improvement (days), mean ± SD
Symptom
Control (n = 63)
Observation (n = 64)
t
P value
Abdominal pain11.47 ± 2.158.35 ± 1.968.548< 0.001
Diarrhea11.04 ± 2.478.62 ± 1.856.255< 0.001
Rectal bleeding8.93 ± 1.646.32 ± 1.0710.638< 0.001
Fever7.68 ± 1.425.43 ± 1.159.820< 0.001
Mucosal healing9.63 ± 1.866.12 ± 1.2912.373< 0.001
Table 4 Comparison of adverse reaction occurrences
Adverse reaction
Control (n = 63)
Observation (n = 64)
χ2
P value
Nausea/vomiting22--
Decreased appetite22--
Indigestion11--
Gastric burning sensation12--
Total occurrence rate (%)9.52%10.94%0.0690.792