Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2025; 17(2): 101897
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.101897
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.101897
Table 1 Difference analysis between high recurrence risk group and low recurrence risk group
Variables | Total (n = 90) | LRR group (n = 53) | HRR group (n = 37) | Statistic | P value |
Age (year), mean ± SD | 64.92 ± 10.44 | 64.66 ± 10.98 | 65.30 ± 9.75 | t = -0.28 | 0.778 |
Sex, n (%) | χ² = 1.79 | 0.180 | |||
Female | 29 (32.22) | 20 (37.74) | 9 (24.32) | - | - |
Male | 61 (67.78) | 33 (62.26) | 28 (75.68) | - | - |
BMI, mean ± SD | 25.31 ± 2.90 | 25.08 ± 2.90 | 25.63 ± 2.92 | t = -0.88 | 0.380 |
Smoking, n (%) | χ² = 0.37 | 0.541 | |||
No | 65 (72.22) | 37 (69.81) | 28 (75.68) | - | - |
Yes | 25 (27.78) | 16 (30.19) | 9 (24.32) | - | - |
Drinking, n (%) | χ² = 0.11 | 0.737 | |||
No | 59 (65.56) | 34 (64.15) | 25 (67.57) | - | - |
Yes | 31 (34.44) | 19 (35.85) | 12 (32.43) | - | - |
Family history, n (%) | χ² = 0.00 | 1.000 | |||
No | 80 (88.89) | 47 (88.68) | 33 (89.19) | - | - |
Yes | 10 (11.11) | 6 (11.32) | 4 (10.81) | - | - |
Complication, n (%) | χ² = 0.32 | 0.571 | |||
No | 47 (52.22) | 29 (54.72) | 18 (48.65) | - | - |
Yes | 43 (47.78) | 24 (45.28) | 19 (51.35) | - | - |
MTL, mean ± SD | 3.98 ± 1.29 | 3.82 ± 1.30 | 4.22 ± 1.25 | t = -1.48 | 0.141 |
Tumor location, n (%) | χ² = 0.48 | 0.787 | |||
Low | 32 (35.56) | 20 (37.74) | 12 (32.43) | - | - |
Median | 39 (43.33) | 23 (43.40) | 16 (43.24) | - | - |
High | 19 (21.11) | 10 (18.87) | 9 (24.32) | - | - |
MrT staging, n (%) | χ² = 2.81 | 0.094 | |||
I or II | 46 (51.11) | 31 (58.49) | 15 (40.54) | - | - |
III or IV | 44 (48.89) | 22 (41.51) | 22 (59.46) | - | - |
MrN staging, n (%) | χ² = 4.43 | 0.035 | |||
0 or I | 46 (51.11) | 32 (60.38) | 14 (37.84) | - | - |
II or III | 44 (48.89) | 21 (39.62) | 23 (62.16) | - | - |
CRM, n (%) | χ² = 8.25 | 0.004 | |||
Negative | 38 (42.22) | 29 (54.72) | 9 (24.32) | - | - |
Positive | 52 (57.78) | 24 (45.28) | 28 (75.68) | - | - |
EMVI, n (%) | - | - | - | χ² = 4.50 | 0.034 |
Negative | 60 (66.67) | 40 (75.47) | 20 (54.05) | - | - |
Positive | 30 (33.33) | 13 (24.53) | 17 (45.95) | - | - |
CEA, mean ± SD | 40.08 ± 11.25 | 35.57 ± 9.31 | 46.55 ± 10.71 | t = -5.17 | < 0.001 |
CA125, mean ± SD | 11.72 ± 5.25 | 11.07 ± 5.28 | 12.66 ± 5.13 | t = -1.42 | 0.160 |
CA199, mean ± SD | 56.58 ± 11.18 | 50.44 ± 7.85 | 65.39 ± 9.19 | t = -8.29 | < 0.001 |
Table 2 Univariate logistic regression analysis
Variables | β | SE | Z | P value | OR (95%CI) |
Age | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.29 | 0.775 | 1.01 (0.97-1.05) |
Sex | |||||
Female | - | - | - | - | 1.00 (Reference) |
Male | 0.63 | 0.48 | 1.33 | 0.183 | 1.89 (0.74-4.80) |
BMI | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.88 | 0.377 | 1.07 (0.92-1.24) |
Smoking | |||||
No | - | - | - | - | 1.00 (Reference) |
Yes | -0.30 | 0.49 | -0.61 | 0.542 | 0.74 (0.29-1.93) |
Drinking | |||||
No | - | - | - | - | 1.00 (Reference) |
Yes | -0.15 | 0.45 | -0.34 | 0.737 | 0.86 (0.35-2.09) |
Family history | |||||
No | - | - | - | - | 1.00 (Reference) |
Yes | -0.05 | 0.68 | -0.08 | 0.940 | 0.95 (0.25-3.63) |
Complication | |||||
No | - | - | - | - | 1.00 (Reference) |
Yes | 0.24 | 0.43 | 0.57 | 0.571 | 1.28 (0.55-2.96) |
MTL | 0.26 | 0.17 | 1.47 | 0.143 | 1.29 (0.92- 1.82) |
Tumor location | |||||
Low | - | - | - | - | 1.00 (Reference) |
Median | 0.15 | 0.49 | 0.30 | 0.762 | 1.16 (0.44-3.02) |
High | 0.41 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.490 | 1.50 (0.47-4.74) |
MrT staging | |||||
I or II | - | - | - | - | 1.00 (Reference) |
III or IV | 0.73 | 0.44 | 1.67 | 0.096 | 2.07 (0.88-4.85) |
MrN staging | |||||
0 or I | - | - | - | - | 1.00 (Reference) |
II or III | 0.92 | 0.44 | 2.08 | 0.037 | 2.50 (1.06-5.93) |
CRM | |||||
Negative | - | - | - | - | 1.00 (Reference) |
Positive | 1.32 | 0.47 | 2.80 | 0.005 | 3.76 (1.49-9.49) |
EMVI | |||||
Negative | - | - | - | - | 1.00 (Reference) |
Positive | 0.96 | 0.46 | 2.09 | 0.036 | 2.62 (1.06-6.43) |
CEA | 0.11 | 0.03 | 4.06 | < 0.001 | 1.12 (1.06-1.18) |
CA125 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 1.40 | 0.161 | 1.06 (0.98-1.15) |
CA199 | 0.22 | 0.04 | 4.95 | < 0.001 | 1.24 (1.14-1.35) |
Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression analysis
Variables | β | SE | Z | P value | OR (95%CI) | VIF |
EMVI | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Negative | - | - | - | - | 1.00 (Reference) | - |
Positive | 1.46 | 0.72 | 2.01 | 0.045 | 4.29 (1.04-17.76) | 2.31 |
CEA | 0.07 | 0.04 | 2.04 | 0.041 | 1.08 (1.01-1.15) | 1.60 |
CA125 | 0.18 | 0.08 | 2.13 | 0.034 | 1.19 (1.01-1.40) | 1.32 |
CA199 | 0.24 | 0.06 | 3.95 | < 0.001 | 1.27 (1.13-1.44) | 1.49 |
Table 4 Confusion matrix analysis of clinical predictive models
AUC (95%CI) | Accuracy (95%CI) | Sensitivity (95%CI) | Specificity (95%CI) | PPV (95%CI) | NPV (95%CI) | Cut off |
0.93 (0.89-0.98) | 0.83 (0.74-0.90) | 0.74 (0.62-0.85) | 0.97 (0.92-1.00) | 0.98 (0.93-1.00) | 0.72 (0.60-0.84) | 0.145 |
- Citation: Wu L, Zhu JJ, Liang XH, Tong H, Song Y. Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging parameters combined with tumor markers for rectal cancer recurrence risk after surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(2): 101897
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i2/101897.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.101897