Jiang Y, Bu BL, Yang W, Zhi Y, Ye HY. Humanistic and graded psychological nursing care for patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal tumors. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(2): 100322 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.100322]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Bao-Lian Bu, Department of Gastroenterology, Zhejiang Jinhua Guangfu Tumor Hospital, No. 1296 North Ring Road, Wucheng District, Jinhua 321000, Zhejiang Province, China. 15105796202@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2025; 17(2): 100322 Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.100322
Table 1 Comparison of postoperative first meal time, surgery duration, and length of hospital stay between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group
n
First postoperative meal time (day)
Surgery duration (hour)
Length of hospital stay (day)
Control group
90
2.45 ± 0.32
77.51 ± 10.58
12.37 ± 1.12
Observation group
90
1.81 ± 0.43
68.35 ± 10.31
8.65 ± 1.03
t value
6.839
5.216
6.856
P value
0.017
0.020
0.018
Table 2 Comparison of self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale scores between the two groups (points, mean ± SD)
Group
n
SAS
SDS
Before nursing
After nursing
t value
P value
Before nursing
After nursing
t value
P value
Control group
90
61.35 ± 6.12
52.38 ± 5.21
5.386
0.023
60.10 ± 3.21
51.23 ± 8.25
6.287
0.024
Observation group
90
61.29 ± 7.06
43.17 ± 5.68
6.821
0.019
60.22 ± 4.52
41.57 ± 6.52
8.125
0.018
t value
0.239
8.352
0.315
6.583
P value
0.512
0.021
0.423
0.010
Table 3 Comparison of quality of life between the two groups before and after nursing care (mean ± SD)
Item
Stage
Control group (n = 90)
Observation group (n = 90)
t value
P value
Daily life
Before nursing
67.35 ± 5.12
67.58 ± 5.07
0.436
0.128
After nursing
73.10 ± 3.26
80.01 ± 6.39
5.327
0.021
t value
6.037
5.865
P value
0.021
0.020
Physiological function
Before nursing
70.34 ± 5.36
70.82 ± 5.51
0.351
0.258
After nursing
76.11 ± 6.25
83.59 ± 6.89
5.187
0.020
t value
5.109
8.357
P value
0.022
0.018
Psychology
Before nursing
68.35 ± 4.27
68.59 ± 4.35
0.517
0.365
After nursing
74.51 ± 5.16
81.69 ± 5.34
5.639
0.025
t value
6.235
7.512
P value
0.023
0.020
Social function
Before nursing
68.31 ± 5.68
68.16 ± 5.37
0.411
0.327
After nursing
77.65 ± 6.13
85.23 ± 6.05
6.132
0.021
t value
5.361
7.155
P value
0.021
0.018
Table 4 Comparison of nursing satisfaction between the two groups, n (%)
Group
n
Very satisfied
Satisfied
Dissatisfied
Overall satisfaction
Control group
90
45 (50.00)
33 (36.67)
12 (13.33)
78 (86.67)
Observation group
90
54 (60.00)
31 (34.44)
5 (5.56)
85 (94.44)
χ2
6.851
P value
0.021
Table 5 Comparison of the incidence of adverse reactions, n (%)
Group
n
Abdominal pain
Bleeding
Bore a hole
Total incidence rate
Control group
90
4 (4.44)
4 (4.44)
2 (2.22)
10 (11.10)
Observation group
90
3 (3.33)
2 (2.22)
0 (0)
5 (5.55)
χ2
9.357
P value
0.019
Table 6 Analysis of self-efficacy scores in the two groups (mean ± SD)
Control group (n = 90)
Observation group (n = 90)
t value
P value
Before nursing
22.43 ± 2.42
23.02 ± 2.37
1.652
0.100
After nursing
25.53 ± 2.98
29.23 ± 3.12
8.136
< 0.001
Citation: Jiang Y, Bu BL, Yang W, Zhi Y, Ye HY. Humanistic and graded psychological nursing care for patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal tumors. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(2): 100322