Randomized Controlled Trial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2025; 17(1): 99464
Published online Jan 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.99464
Table 1 Comparison of therapeutic effects, n (%)
Group
Number of cases
Cured
Improved
Non-healing
Total effective rate
Control group5023 (46.00)18 (36.00)9 (18.00)41 (82.00)
Treatment group5029 (58.00)20 (40.00)1 (2.00)49 (98.00)
χ2 value7.111
P value0.007
Table 2 Comparison between groups of operation time/wound healing time/hospital stay
Group
Number of cases
Operation time (minutes)
Wound healing time (day)
Hospital stay (day)
Control group5055.90 ± 12.8416.72 ± 3.049.72 ± 3.04
Treatment group5031.70 ± 11.6314.06 ± 2.716.26 ± 1.95
t value9.8784.6196.774
P value< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
Table 3 Comparison of pain between the two groups
Group
Number of cases
24 hours after surgery (points)
First defecation pain score (points)
Control group503.94 ± 1.335.86 ± 1.36
Treatment group501.96 ± 1.403.56 ± 1.80
t value7.2507.209
P value< 0.001< 0.001
Table 4 Comparison of quality of life between the two groups
Group
Number of cases
Before surgery, mean ± SD, points
After surgery, mean ± SD, points
t value
P value
Control group5073.61 ± 9.2554.26 ± 8.1711.087< 0.001
Treatment group5072.98 ± 9.3441.38 ± 8.0618.112< 0.001
t value-0.3397.936--
P value-0.735< 0.001--
Table 5 Comparison of complication rates between the two groups, n (%)
Group
Number of cases
Postoperative hemorrhage
Edema
Infect
Complication incidence
Control group505 (10.00)3 (6.00)2 (4.00)10 (20.00)
Treatment group501 (2.00)1 (2.00)0 (0.00)2 (4.00)
χ2 value0.060
P value0.013
Table 6 Comparison of prognosis between the two groups, n (%)
Group
Number of cases
Anal stenosis rate 3 months after surgery
Recurrence rate in 1 year after operation
Control group502 (4.00)3 (6.00)
Treatment group5001 (2.00)
χ2 value0.5100.260
P value0.4750.610