Liu WH, Xiong M, Chen GQ, Long Z, Xu C, Zhu L, Wu JS. Laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis vs open anastomosis for ileostomy reversal in Crohn's disease: A single center retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(1): 98269 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.98269]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Jing-Song Wu, PhD, Professor, Department of General Surgery, Chongqing General Hospital, No. 118 Starlight Avenue, Chongqing 401120, China. wjsrmyy@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Medicine, General & Internal
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2025; 17(1): 98269 Published online Jan 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.98269
Table 1 Baseline clinical characteristics of patients
Characteristics
OIR
LIIR
P value
Age (years)
28 (25-33)
26.5 (18.75-32)
0.242
Sex
0.526
Male
6 (40)
15 (50)
BMI (kg/m2)
19.5 (17.4-21.3)
18.55 (17.85-19.375)
0.166
ASA
0.092
I-II
10 (66.67)
12 (40)
III-IV
5 (33.33)
18 (60)
Duration of ileostomy retention (months)
8 (6-9)
6.5 (6-10)
0.836
Medication
0.446
Immunosuppressant
2 (13.33)
1 (3.33)
Biologics
12 (80)
27 (90)
5-ASA
1 (6.7)
2 (6.67)
WBC (109/L)
6.150 ± 1.405
6.198 ± 1.522
0.92
NE (109/L)
4.221 ± 1.377
3.802 ± 1.589
0.389
LYM (109/L)
1.2 (1.01-1.38)
1.315 (1.18-1.538)
0.393
PLT (109/L)
271.27 ± 59.977
247.33 ± 62.643
0.227
Hb (g/L)
131.13 ± 6.312
135.10 ± 9.767
0.161
ALB (g/L)
44.267 ± 6.344
44.043 ± 4.178
0.888
CRP (mg/L)
1.22 (0.79-2.58)
0.885 (0.77-8.158)
0.895
ESR (mm)
15 (8-18)
10.5 (6-15.25)
0.091
Table 2 Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes
Variables
OIR
LIIR
P value
Operation time, minutes
194.4 ± 23.194
191.4 ± 34.152
0.761
Intraoperative hemorrhage (mL)
100 (70-100)
70 (60-100)
0.091
anastomotic site
0.118
Ileum-ileum
4 (26.67)
16 (53.33)
Ileum-colon
11 (73.33)
14 (46.67)
Enterolysis range
0.14
Around ileostomy
5 (33.33)
17 (56.67)
Distal and proximal bowel
10 (66.67)
13 (43.33)
First postoperative flatus, days
2 (2-3)
2 (1-2.25)
0.128
Postoperative complication
4 (26.67)
5 (16.67)
0.454
Anastomotic hemorrhage
0 (0)
2 (6.67)
0.545
Anastomotic leakage
0 (0)
0 (0)
1
Wound infection
2 (13.33)
1 (3.3)
0.254
Postoperative ileus
2 (13.33)
2 (6.67)
0.591
Reoperation
0 (0)
2 (6.67)
0.545
Postoperative days in the hospital, days
13 (11-16)
11 (10-12.25)
0.045
Total hospitalization costs (RMB)
34111 (31240-37892)
36211 (33220.25-40116.75)
0.038
Table 3 Clinical outcomes for enteral nutrition intolerance
Variables
OIR
LIIR
P value
Total symptoms of feeding intolerance
7 (53.85)
4 (14.29)
0.019
Abdominal distension/pain
5 (38.46)
3 (10.71)
0.084
Nausea/vomiting
2 (15.38)
0 (0)
0.095
Diarrhea
5 (38.46)
4 (14.29)
0.113
Enteral nutrition intolerance
3 (23.08)
3 (10.71)
0.361
Time to total enteral nutrition (days)
6 (6-8.5)
6 (5-6)
0.033
Table 4 Logistic multifactorial regression analysis of postoperative symptoms of enteral nutrition intolerance
Variables
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
OR (95%CI)
P value
OR (95%CI)
P value
Sex
1.750 (0.422-7.253)
0.44
Age
0.988 (0.908-1.073)
0.768
BMI
1.342 (0.875-2.059)
0.178
Duration of stoma retention
1.309 (0.980-1.748)
0.068
anastomotic site
5.143 (0.947-27.921)
0.058
Enterolysis range
4.606 (1.007-21.072)
0.049
1.673(0.250-11.217)
0.596
Operation time
1.054 (1.013-1.095)
0.009
1.059(1.005-1.115)
0.031
anastomotic technique
0.143 (0.031-0.653)
0.012
0.120(0.017-0.862)
0.035
Citation: Liu WH, Xiong M, Chen GQ, Long Z, Xu C, Zhu L, Wu JS. Laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis vs open anastomosis for ileostomy reversal in Crohn's disease: A single center retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(1): 98269