Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2024; 16(8): 2451-2460
Published online Aug 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2451
Table 1 Comparison between 298 locally advanced gastric cancer patients with the time to postoperative recurrence and metastasis ≤ 5 years and > 5 years after laparoscopic assisted D2 radical distal gastrectomy
Clinical pathological factors
Recurrence and metastasis within ≤ 5 years after surgery, n = 255
Recurrence and metastasis after surgery > 5 years, n = 43
Statistical value
P value
Types of recurrence and metastasis--χ2 = 5.520.238
Distant metastasis215χ2 = 0.530.466
Peritoneal metastasis699χ2 = 0.720.398
Local recurrence3710χ2 = 2.120.146
Multiple relapses and metastases524χ2 = 2.90.085
Recurrence and metastasis in other parts7615χ2 = 0.450.503
Pathological TNM staging----
Stage II6223χ2 = 15.36< 0.001
Stage III19320
Pathological T-staging--Z = -1.800.07
    T2429χ2 = 0.5247
    T39521χ2 = 2.080.150
    T4a11813χ2 = 3.840.049
Pathological N-staging--Z = -3.340.001
    NO1912χ2 = 16.52< 0.001
    N1445χ2 = 0.850.357
    N28518χ2 = 1.180.277
    N31078χ2 = 8.470.004
Table 2 Univariate analysis of overall survival rate of locally advanced gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic D2 radical distal gastrectomy
Clinical pathological factors
β value
SE
Wald value
Hazard ratio
95%CI
P value
Sex as female/male0.030.110.071.030.82-1.300.788
Age0.370.129.581.451.15-1.840.002
Body mass index-0.250.191.760.780.54-1.130.19
Scoring for EUSSCG--1.97--0.37
1-0-0.040.120.090.970.77-1.210.77
≥ 20.360.281.711.440.84-2.470.19
Intraoperative blood transfusion0.140.160.821.150.85-1.560.37
Hejing syndrome0.100.130.591.110.85-1.440.44
Maximum diameter of the tumor in > 4 cm to ≤ 4 cm0.490.1120.351.641.32-2.03< 0.001
Tumor location0.000.140.060.970.74-1.270.81
Remmunm typing--2.16--0.34
Type III-IV is more common than Type I-II0.070.120.321.070.85-1.340.57
Unknown ratio of type I to type II-0.230.211.220.800.53-1.190.27
degree of tumor differentiation--5.99--0.05
Low undifferentiated to high medium differentiated0.310.135.571.371.05-1.770.02
Unknown high to medium differentiation0.100.230.200.110.71-0.730.65
Pathological TNM staging0.720.1235.292.051.62-2.59< 0.001
Pathological T-staging0.260.115.691.301.05-1.610.02
Pathological N-staging--55.20--< 0.001
    N10.260.210.481.300.85-1.970.22
    N20.520.197.881.68.17-2.420.01
    N31.130.1837.783.082.15-4.41< 0.00
Gastrointestinal reconstruction methods--4.49--0.21
Billroth II matches better than Billroth I matches0.080.120.411.080.85-1.370.52
Roux-en-Y matches better than Billroth I matches0.020.290.001.020.58-1.820.94
Other matches better than Billroth I0.400.194.401.501.03-2.180.13
Lymph node dissection-0.170.240.460.850.53-1.360.94
Tumor proximal margin0.000.010.021.000.99-1.00.88
Distal margin of tumor resection0.000.000.021.000.99-1.00.90
Combined organ resection0.770.581.782.170.70-6.750.18
Postoperative chemotherapy-0.590.1224.400.560.44-0.70< 0.001
Number of lymph node dissection0.110.170.441.120.80-1.570.51
Complications0.090.170.260.100.78-1.520.61
Clavien-Dindo ≥ Grade III complications-0.180.500.130.840.31-2.240.72
Table 3 Multivariate analysis of overall survival rate of locally advanced gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic D2 radical distal gastrectomy
Clinical pathological factors
β value
SE
Wald value
Hazard ratio
95%CI
P value
Ages of > 65 years to ≤ 65 years0.240.123.731.270.99-1.610.053
Maximum diameter of the tumor of > 4 cm to ≤ 4 cm0.390.1112.191.481.19-1.84< 0.001
Degree of tumor differentiation10.080.006
Low undifferentiated to high medium differentiated0.370.147.361.441.11-1.880.007
Unknown high to medium differentiation-0.070.230.100.930.60-1.460.753
Pathological TNM staging of stage III compared to stage II0.590.1223.411.811.42-2.30< 0.001
Postoperative chemotherapy-0.560.1220.810.570.45-0.73< 0.001