Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2024; 16(7): 2175-2182
Published online Jul 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2175
Published online Jul 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2175
Table 1 Comparison of basic characteristics of patients in the two groups, n (%)
Feature | Nutritional support group (n = 60) | Control group (n = 60) | P value |
Age | 75.2 ± 3.1 | 74.8 ± 3.5 | 0.412 |
Gender: Male/female | 32/28 | 30/30 | 0.754 |
Pathological type | |||
Adenocarcinoma | 50 (83.3) | 48 (80.0) | 0.623 |
Mucinous adenocarcinoma | 7 (11.7) | 9 (15.0) | 0.521 |
Other | 3 (5.0) | 3 (5.0) | 1.000 |
Surgical approach | |||
Radical resection | 55 (91.7) | 56 (93.3) | 0.654 |
Gastrectomy | 5 (8.3) | 4 (6.7) | 0.754 |
Table 2 Change trends of immune function indicators
Time point | Percentage of CD4+ lymphocytes in nutritional support group | Percentage of CD4+ lymphocytes in control group | CD4+/CD8+ ratio in nutritional support group | CD4+/CD8+ ratio in control group | Immunoglobulin G (g/L) in nutritional support group | Immunoglobulin G (g/L) in control group | Z value | P value |
2 wk after surgery | 35.2 ± 4.5 | 35.1 ± 4.7 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 10.5 ± 2.3 | 10.8 ± 2.1 | 2.37 | < 0.05 |
4 wk after surgery | 38.7 ± 4.2 | 37.8 ± 4.1 | 1.4 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 12.1 ± 2.5 | 11.5 ± 2.3 | 2.74 | < 0.05 |
6 wk after surgery | 39.8 ± 5.2 | 32.6 ± 4.2 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 15.2 ± 2.7 | 12.5 ± 2.4 | 3.14 | < 0.05 |
Table 3 Trends in nutritional status
Time point | Weight (kg) in nutritional support group | Weight (kg) in control group | BMI in nutritional support group | BMI in control group | Z value | P value |
2 wk after surgery | 65.8 ± 3.5 | 66.1 ± 3.2 | 24.5 ± 1.8 | 24.7 ± 1.7 | 1.53 | < 0.05 |
4 wk after surgery | 66.1 ± 3.7 | 64.8 ± 3.5 | 24.8 ± 1.9 | 24.2 ± 1.8 | -3.27 | < 0.05 |
6 wk after surgery | 66.2 ± 3.8 | 64.5 ± 3.4 | 24.9 ± 2.0 | 23.8 ± 1.9 | -1.43 | < 0.05 |
Table 4 Change trends of inflammatory response indicators
Time point | C-reactive protein (mg/L) in nutritional support group | C-reactive protein (mg/L) in control group | White blood cell count (× 109/L) in nutritional support group | White blood cell count (× 109/L) in control group | Z value | P value |
2 wk after surgery | 3.2 ± 0.8 | 3.1 ± 0.7 | 6.2 ± 1.1 | 6.1 ± 1.0 | 2.25 | < 0.05 |
4 wk after surgery | 3.4 ± 1.0 | 3.6 ± 0.9 | 6.3 ± 1.2 | 6.8 ± 1.1 | -2.53 | < 0.05 |
6 wk after surgery | 3.5 ± 1.0 | 4.0 ± 1.2 | 6.5 ± 1.3 | 7.2 ± 1.2 | 1.52 | < 0.05 |
Table 5 Trends in clinical outcomes
Time point | Length of stay (d) in nutritional support group | Length of stay (d) in control group | Infection rate (%) in nutritional support group | Infection rate (%) in control group | Z value | P value |
2 wk after surgery | 10.5 ± 2.3 | 11.8 ± 2.5 | 15.0% | 22.5% | 2.11 | < 0.05 |
4 wk after surgery | 9.1 ± 1.8 | 10.7 ± 2.1 | 12.5% | 18.3% | -2.74 | < 0.05 |
6 wk after surgery | 8.3 ± 1.8 | 12.2 ± 2.7 | 10.0% | 25.0% | 1.63 | < 0.05 |
- Citation: Chen XW, Guo XC, Cheng F. Impact of nutritional support on immunity, nutrition, inflammation, and outcomes in elderly gastric cancer patients after surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(7): 2175-2182
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i7/2175.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2175