Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2024; 16(5): 1320-1327
Published online May 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i5.1320
Published online May 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i5.1320
Factors | Con (n = 30) | Res (n = 30) | χ2 or t-test result | P value |
Age (yr) | 38.13 ± 6.05 | 39.38 ± 6.72 | 0.757 | 0.452 |
Sex (male/female) | 13/17 | 14/16 | 0.067 | 0.795 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 32.05 ± 2.80 | 32.05 ± 2.80 | 0.673 | 0.504 |
ASA classification (I/II) | 20/10 | 17/13 | 0.635 | 0.426 |
Educational level (below high school/high school and above) | 22/8 | 17/13 | 1.832 | 0.176 |
Adverse event | Con (n = 30) | Res (n = 30) | χ2 | P value |
Nausea and vomiting | 2 (6.67) | 0 (0.00) | ||
Bradycardia | 4 (13.33) | 2 (6.67) | ||
Hypotension | 3 (10.00) | 1 (3.33) | ||
Apnea | 2 (6.67) | 1 (3.33) | ||
Total | 11 (36.67) | 4 (13.33) | 4.356 | 0.037 |
- Citation: Deng YF, Jiang XR, Feng ZG. Comparative observation of the effectiveness and safety of remimazolam besylate versus dexmedetomidine in gastrointestinal surgery in obese patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(5): 1320-1327
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i5/1320.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i5.1320