Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2024; 16(5): 1301-1310
Published online May 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i5.1301
Table 1 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of variables in predicting the incidence of acute-on-chronic liver failure within 1 year after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the training cohort
VariablesOR comparisonUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
OR
95%CI
P value
OR
95%CI
P value
GenderMale vs female0.9220.471-1.8020.811
Age≥ 65 yr vs < 65 yr2.0861.074-4.0550.0302.6491.263-5.5580.010a
DMYes vs No1.8470.905-3.7690.092
Portal vein thrombosisYes vs No0.8090.411-1.5900.539
SplenectomyYes vs No0.4260.146-1.2400.117
Etiology of cirrhosisViral hepatitis vs other1.1740.609-2.2650.631
TIPS indicationEGVB vs refractory ascites1.3040.477-3.5630.605
WBC< 4.0 × 109/L vs ≥ 4.0 × 109/L0.5780.297-1.1230.106
PLT< 100 × 109/L vs ≥ 100 × 109/L2.0850.930-4.6740.075
ALT> 40 U/L vs ≤ 40 U/L2.0000.856-4.6730.109
TBil17.1-34.1 μmol/L vs < 17.1 μmol/L3.0641.212-7.7420.0182.9441.151-7.5280.024a
34.2-51.2 μmol/L vs < 17.1 μmol/L12.3574.433-34.443011.6324.068-33.259< 0.001a
≥ 51.3 μmol/L vs < 17.1 μmol/L24.7146.342-96.315028.7466.969-118.579< 0.001a
Alb≥ 35.0 g/L vs < 35.0 g/L1.6510.758-3.5960.206
Na< 135 mmol/L vs ≥ 135 mmol/L3.6061.402-9.2750.0082.7410.960-7.8210.0601
Scr≥ 133 μmol/L vs < 133 μmol/L1.3680.295-6.3490.689
INR< 1.5 vs ≥ 1.52.3631.001-5.5750.050
FIB< 2.0 g/L vs ≥ 2.0 g/L1.5420.726-3.2730.259
Stent diameter≥ 8 mm vs < 8 mm0.7870.392-1.5810.501
Puncture siteRight branch vs left branch1.0000.373-2.6801.000
Bifurcation vs left branch1.0670.437-2.6020.887
Trunk vs left branch0.8890.352-2.2460.803
Table 2 Risk score scale for prediction of the incidence of acute-on-chronic liver failure within 1 year after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt
Variable
1 point
2 points
3 points
4 points
Age (yr)< 65.0≥ 65.0
TBil (μmol/L)≤ 17.117.2-34.234.3-51.3 > 51.3
Na (mmol/L)≥ 135.0< 135.0