Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2024; 16(2): 529-538
Published online Feb 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.529
Published online Feb 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.529
Table 1 Evaluation of three different methods in the experimental group 6 months after operation and 12 months after operation
Six months after operation | Twelve months after operation | P value | |
LARS score (n = 34) | 37.02 ± 4.91 | 32.58 ± 3.43 | < 0.001 |
Defecation rate% (n = 34) | 39.47 ± 0.15 | 35.53 ± 0.17 | 0.411 |
MRI-RC score (n = 34) | 4.41 ± 2.40 | 4.82 ± 2.92 | 0.165 |
Table 2 Analysis of the relationship between defecation rate and magnetic resonance imaging-rectal compliance score between experimental group and control group
Experimental group (n = 34) | Control group (n = 26) | P value | |
Defecation rate (%) | 35.53 ± 0.17 | 61.19 ± 0.86 | 0.007 |
MRI-RC score | 4.82 ± 2.92 | 8.88 ± 0.90 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Analysis of the relationship between defecation rate and magnetic resonance imaging-rectal compliance score in severe group and mild group
Severe group (n = 24) | Mild group (n = 10) | P value | |
Defecation rate (%) | 29.36 ± 14.17 | 46.83 ± 18.62 | 0.004 |
MRI-RC score | 3.63 ± 1.96 | 7.0 ± 3.21 | 0.001 |
- Citation: Meng LH, Mo XW, Yang BY, Qin HQ, Song QZ, He XX, Li Q, Wang Z, Mo CL, Yang GH. To explore the pathogenesis of anterior resection syndrome by magnetic resonance imaging rectal defecography. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(2): 529-538
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i2/529.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.529