Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2024; 16(1): 76-84
Published online Jan 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i1.76
Table 1 Comparison of clinical data of the two groups of patients
Index
Study group (n = 100)
Control group (n = 100)
χ2/t
P value
Gender (n)0.0220.883
    Male6535
    Female6436
Age (yr)48.8 ± 4.549.5 ± 5.80.6390.524
BMI (kg/m2)21.50 ± 3.1222.01 ± 2.851.2070.229
Surgical type (n)0.0880.993
Biliary-intestinal anastomosis3334
Hepatic lobectomy3231
Pancreaticoduodenectomy1918
Pancreaticocaudectomy1617
Complications (n)0.7950.672
    Diabetes45
    Hypertension1814
    Hyperlipidemia911
Smoking history (n)0.1890.664
    Yes1618
    No2927
Drinking history (n)0.1790.673
    Yes2022
    No2523
Table 2 Comparison of bowel sounds recovery time, gas discharge time, and first feeding time in two groups of patients (mean ± SD)
Index
Study group (n = 100)
Control group (n = 100)
t
P value
Feeding time (h)32.15 ± 6.0145.38 ± 5.6316.065< 0.001
Defecation time (h)41.15 ± 9.4655.38 ± 11.039.793< 0.001
Bowel sound recovery time (h)28.86 ± 8.4647.71 ± 10.2714.167< 0.001
Anal first exhaust time (h)39.14 ± 9.5149.91 ± 8.538.431< 0.001
First out of bed time (d)2.16 ± 1.033.27 ± 1.625.782< 0.001
Table 3 Comparison of overall therapeutic effectiveness between the two groups [n (%)]
Index
Study group (n = 100)
Control group (n = 100)
χ2
P value
Remarkable73 (73.00)40 (40.00)
Effective25 (25.00)28 (28.00)
Invalidity2 (2.00)32 (32.00)
Total effective rate98 (98.00)68 (68.00)31.892< 0.001
Table 4 Postoperative hospitalization status and pain analysis in the two groups (mean ± SD)
Index
Study group (n = 100)
Control group (n = 100)
t
P value
Duration of hospitalization (d)7.24 ± 0.8112.16 ± 0.9339.893< 0.001
Postoperative pain score (s)2.03 ± 0.153.85 ± 1.0217.653< 0.001
Catheter removal time (d)2.16 ± 0.313.97 ± 0.5229.898< 0.001
Table 5 Comparison of postoperative complications between the two groups [n (%)]
Index
Study group (n = 100)
Control group (n = 100)
χ2
P value
Intestinal obstruction2 (2.00)6 (6.00)
Stomatitis1 (1.00)8 (8.00)
Belch1 (1.00)9 (9.00)
Chapstick1 (1.00)11 (11.00)
Overall incidence rate5 (5.00)34 (34.00)26.788< 0.001
Table 6 Comparison of nutritional index before and after intervention in the two groups of patients (mean ± SD)
Index
Study group (n = 100)
Control group (n = 100)
t
P value
Before intervention32.15 ± 3.8331.95 ± 3.280.397> 0.05
After intervention48.72 ± 2.5135.63 ± 3.1632.437< 0.001