Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2024; 16(1): 40-48
Published online Jan 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i1.40
Table 1 Clinical data
Factors
Control group (n = 90)
Observation group (n = 104)
χ2 value
P value
Sex0.3350.562
    Male5964
    Female3140
Age (yr)0.5330.465
    ≥ 604850
    < 604254
BMI (kg/m2)0.3590.548
    ≥ 252533
    < 256571
ASA score2.3000.129
    Phase II4435
    Phase III5669
History of abdominal surgery1.2180.269
    Yes1220
    No7884
Medical history
    Hypertension28350.1420.706
    Diabetes mellitus19270.6270.428
Table 2 Clinical efficacy evaluation
Group
Control group (n = 90)
Observation group (n = 104)
χ2 value
P value
Markedly effective40 (44.44)70 (67.31)10.6560.001
Effective32 (35.56)34 (32.69)
Ineffective18 (20.00)5 (4.81)
Total effective rate72 (20.00)99 (95.19)
Table 3 Complications
Group
Control group (n = 90)
Observation group (n = 104)
χ2 value
P value
Subcutaneous emphysema8113.36< 0.001
Incision infection43
Ileus42
Seroperitoneum52
Anastomotic leakage51
Total incidence rate26 (28.89%)9 (8.65%)
Table 4 Comparison of recurrence and survival rates
Group
Control group (n = 90)
Observation group (n = 104)
χ2 value
P value
3-year survival rate64 (71.11)73 (69.23)0.0810.775
3-year recurrence rate14 (15.56)18 (17.31)0.1070.743