Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2024; 16(1): 21-28
Published online Jan 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i1.21
Table 1 The baseline characteristics of the patients with a normal appendix and acute appendicitis and sonographic characteristics
Item
Normal appendix (n = 112)
Acute appendicitis (n = 233)
Statistics (t/χ2/Z)
P value

Sex, n (%)14.2882< 0.001
    Male29 (25.9)110 (47.2)
    Female83 (74.1)123 (52.8)
Age (yr) M (IQR)31.0 (24.0, 39.8) 37.0 (28.0, 49.5) -3.40930.001
Detectable length (mm) M (IQR)34.8 (29.8, 43.9)53.2 (45.0, 64.7) -10.1643< 0.001
SD (mm, mean ± SD)4.9 ± 0.99.9 ± 2.0-31.7221< 0.001
LD (mm, mean ± SD)6.5 ± 1.010.7 ± 2.2-24.3401< 0.001
RATIO (mean ± SD)1.32 ± 0.161.09 ± 0.0715.0711< 0.001
Mural lamina n (%)49.9492< 0.001
Clear110 (98.2)146 (62.7)
Ambiguous2 (1.8)87 (37.3)
Mural vascularity, n (%)32.6942< 0.001
Present12 (10.7)96 (41.2)
Absent100 (89.3) 137 (58.8)
Luminal echogenicity, n (%)
Thread-like high echoic62 (55.4)0 (0)
Anechoic2 (1.8)63 (27.0)
Hypoechoic36 (32.1)58 (24.9)197.3082< 0.001
Isoechoic9 (8.0)13 (5.6)
Hyperechoic, shadowing1 (0.9)33 (14.2)
Complex echoic2 (1.8)66 (28.3)
MOD (mm), n (%)
> 677 (68.8)231 (99.1)72.9712< 0.001
≤ 635 (31.2)2 (0.9)
> 730 (26.8)229 (98.3) 206.6222< 0.001
≤ 782 (73.2) 4 (1.7)
> 810 (8.9)212 (91.0)222.0152< 0.001
≤ 8102 (91.1)21 (9.0)
Table 2 Diagnostic performances of different criteria for evaluating acute appendicitis
Item
Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
PPV (%)
NPV (%)
AUC (95%CI)
RATIO (1.18)91.0 83.091.881.60.870 (0.830-0.904)
MOD (> 6 mm)99.131.375.094.60.652 (0.599-0.702)
RATIO + MOD > 6 mm90.192.095.9 81.70.910 (0.875-0.938)