Practical effect of different teaching modes in teaching gastrointestinal surgery nursing

Table 1 Compares the two groups of general data (mean ± SD)

Group	n	Age	Comprehensive results at school
The observation group	36	20.33 ± 0.23	81.20 ± 0.29
The control group	35	20.45 ± 0.31	81.22 ± 0.31
t	-	1.855	0.280
P value	-	0.067	0.779

Table 2 Comparison of post-teaching operational skills (mean ± SD between the two groups)

Group	n	Operation skills (points)
The observation group	36	95.17 ± 1.32
The control group	35	87.46 ± 3.32
t	-	12.924
P value	-	< 0.001

Table 3 Compares the post-teaching theoretical knowledge scores between the two groups (mean ± SD)

Group	n	Theoretical knowledge (points)
The observation group	36	93.24 ± 0.69
The control group	35	88.97 ± 4.88
t	-	5.197
P value	-	< 0.001

Table 4 Compares the satisfaction of two post-teaching nursing students, n (%)

Group	n	Very satisfied	More satisfied	Discontent	Total satisfaction
The observation group	36	31 (86.11)	4 (11.11)	1 (2.77)	35 (97.22)
The control group	35	8 (22.85)	19 (54.28)	8 (22.85)	27 (77.14)
t	-	-	-	-	6.463
P value	-	-	-	-	0.011

Table 5 Results of the learning effectiveness questionnaire (mean ± SD)

Group	n	Contribute to knowledge understanding	Dare to share your personal opinions	Trust on your ability to deal with patients	Understand the responsibilities and obligations of nurses
The observation group	36	1.33 ± 0.23	1.88 ± 0.28	1.46 ± 0.83	1.03 ± 0.67
The control group	35	2.33 ± 0.73	2.45 ± 0.83	3.33 ± 0.23	2.95 ± 0.33
t	-	7.830	3.899	12.855	15.248
P value	-	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001

Table 6 Compares the post-teaching effects between the two groups, n (%)

Group	n	Ability of thinking	Subjective initiative	Understanding of the theoretical knowledge
The observation group	36	34 (94.44)	34 (94.44)	35 (97.22)
The control group	35	23 (65.71)	26 (74.28)	25 (71.42)
χ2	-	9.253	5.508	9.018
P value	-	0.002	0.018	0.002