Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2023; 15(9): 1986-1994
Published online Sep 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i9.1986
Table 1 Comparison of operation time between two groups of patients
Group
n
Operation time (min)
Bleeding volume (mL)
Positive rate of cutting edge (%)
Postoperative drainage time (d)
Postoperative landing time (h)
Length of stay (d)
A group70168.1 ± 15.7136.8 ± 36.11 (1.43)3.71 ± 0.8427.81 ± 7.5112.30 ± 2.13
B group68188.0 ± 19.3188.2 ± 43.73 (4.41)4.40 ± 1.2229.40 ± 7.8213.54 ± 2.35
t/χ2-6.653 -7.542 1.091 -3.879 -1.218 -3.250
P value0.000 0.000 0.296 0.000 0.225 0.001
Table 2 Comparison of lymph node dissection effect between two groups of patients (mean ± SD, number)
Group
n
Number of lymph nodes cleaned
Number of positive lymph nodes
Inferior mediastinal lymph nodes
Subphrenic lymph node
Number of abdominal lymph nodes
A group7033.87 ± 3.823.65 ± 1.203.81 ± 1.202.56 ± 0.7227.50 ± 2.95
B group6834.33 ± 2.903.92 ± 1.534.03 ± 1.152.74 ± 0.7527.56 ± 3.02
t value-0.795 -1.155 -1.099 -1.438 -0.118
P value0.428 0.250 0.274 0.153 0.906
Table 3 Comparison of pulmonary function parameters between two groups of patients (mean ± SD)
Group
n
Preoperative
1 mo after operation
t value
P value
Preoperative
1 mo after operation
t value
P value
FEV1 (%)MVV (%)
A group7095.66 ± 8.6490.21 ± 8.503.734 0.000 98.16 ± 9.2693.48 ± 9.112.992 0.003
B group6897.03 ± 8.1186.30 ± 7.767.937 0.000 96.32 ± 8.5888.75 ± 8.365.248 0.000
t value-0.9602.8201.2103.175
P value0.3390.0060.2280.002
FVC (%)VC (%)
A group7097.34 ± 8.1492.36 ± 6.064.067 0.000 93.06 ± 4.8590.01 ± 4.433.854 0.000
B group6899.03 ± 7.9389.51 ± 7.247.359 0.000 94.41 ± 5.0088.26 ± 5.257.048 0.000
t value-1.2352.510-1.6102.119
P value0.2190.0130.110.036
Table 4 Comparison of quality of life scores between the two groups (mean ± SD, scores)
Group
n
Preoperative
3 mo after operation
t value
P value
A group7031.83 ± 6.6043.09 ± 5.57-10.816 0.000
B group6830.50 ± 5.7840.14 ± 5.42-10.100 0.000
t value1.258 3.152
P value0.211 0.002
Table 5 Comparison of complication rates between the two groups
Group
n
Pulmonary infection
Abdominal infection
Anastomotic fistula
Pyothorax
Incision infection
Pleural effusion
Complication rate (%)
A group701210127 (10.00)
B group6870321316 (23.53)
χ24.546
P value0.033
Table 6 Survival comparison
Group
n
Subsist
Die
A group7025 (35.71)45 (64.29)
B group6820 (29.41)48 (70.59)
χ20.623
P value0.430