Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2023; 15(9): 1871-1878
Published online Sep 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i9.1871
Published online Sep 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i9.1871
Parameters compared | PEG | PEG push technique | PIG | LAG | LAPEG | Open Gastrostomy |
Operation under general anesthesia | Yes (occasionally under sedation) | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Blind puncture through the abdominal cavity | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No |
Gastropexy | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Pneumoperitoneum | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No |
Invasiveness, number of transabdominal wall wounds | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | Incision, midline or subcoastal |
Cosmetics; number of scars on abdominal wall | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 (incision) |
Repeat general anesthesia/sedation for tube change | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
- Citation: Bitar R, Azaz A, Rawat D, Hobeldin M, Miqdady M, Abdelsalam S. Advances and challenges of gastrostomy insertion in children. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(9): 1871-1878
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v15/i9/1871.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i9.1871