Gu YX, Wang XY, Xu MX, Qian JJ, Wang Y. Analysis of the impact of ERAS-based respiratory function training on older patients’ ability to prevent pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(2): 201-210 [PMID: 36896307 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i2.201]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Yan Wang, MBBS, Associate Chief Nurse, Nursing, Shanghai Fourth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 1279 Sanmen Road, Hongkou District, Shanghai 200434, China. 2205309@tongji.edu.cn
Research Domain of This Article
Nursing
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2023; 15(2): 201-210 Published online Feb 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i2.201
Table 1 Demographic and surgical characteristics of the 231 patients
Variable
ERAS group
Control group
P value
Age in yr
72.06 ± 4.72
72.40 ± 4.89
0.59
Sex as male:female
61:51
55:64
0.21
Smoking as yes:no
45:67
53:66
0.50
ASA grade
0.22
I
39 (34.82%)
50 (42.02%)
II
40 (35.71%)
30 (25.21%)
III
33 (29.47%)
39 (32.77%)
IV
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Classification of surgical complexity
0.96
1
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
2
11 (9.82%)
13 (10.92%)
3
72 (64.29%)
76 (63.87%)
4
29 (25.89%)
30 (25.21%)
5
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Epidural analgesia
62
52
0.08
Table 2 Details of the 231 patients’ surgeries
Surgery
ERAS group
Control group
P value
Hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: hepatectomy, bile duct exploration, pancreaticoduodenal surgery, etc.
28 (25.0%)
26 (21.85%)
0.72
Cholecystectomy: laparoscopic or open
31 (27.68%)
27 (22.69%)
Gastric and esophageal surgery
9 (8.03%)
12 (10.09%)
Colorectal surgery
11 (9.82%)
10 (8.40%)
Small intestine: small bowel resection
2 (1.79%)
1 (0.84%)
Others: hernia repair, splenectomy, appendix, etc.
31 (27.68%)
43 (36.13%)
Table 3 Walking test parameters for 231 patients at 2 d, 3 d, and 4 d after surgery
Parameter
Baseline value
ERAS group
Control group
2 d
3 d
4 d
2 d
3 d
4 d
Borg score median
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
Heart rate median/min
86
88.5
81
78
84
81
79
Respiratory frequency median/min
18
19
16
17
18
17
17
SaO2 median %
95
96
97
92
96
97
92
Table 4 Comparison of main outcomes between enhanced recovery after surgery group and control group
Parameter
ERAS group
Control group
P value
Main outcome
Respiratory tract infection
21 (18.75%)
41 (34.45%)
0.007
New/changed X-ray findings
48 (42.86%)
64 (53.78%)
0.114
White blood cell more than 12
39 (34.82%)
56 (47.06%)
0.063
Temperature more than 38 degree centigrade
37 (33.04%)
54 (45.38%)
0.060
Positive sputum bacteria
19 (16.96%)
31 (26.05%)
0.111
Antibiotic therapy
22 (19.64%)
40 (33.61%)
0.018
Secondary results
Preoperative hospitalization time more than 2 d
59 (52.68%)
65 (54.62%)
Preoperative hospitalization time more than 2 d in patients with respiratory tract infection
11 (9.82%)
24 (20.17%)
0.029
The postoperative length of stay in d
9.5 (3-21)
11 (4-18)
0.028
FEV1/FVC more than 70%
86 (76.79%)
74 (62.18%)
0.022
Citation: Gu YX, Wang XY, Xu MX, Qian JJ, Wang Y. Analysis of the impact of ERAS-based respiratory function training on older patients’ ability to prevent pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(2): 201-210