Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Dec 27, 2023; 15(12): 2890-2906
Published online Dec 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i12.2890
Published online Dec 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i12.2890
No. | Ref. | Country | Study type | Treatment | Univariate/multivariate analysis | Cut-off (ng/mL) | Sample size | Age | Male/female | Outcomes | Nos |
1 | Meng et al[34], 2021 | China | Cohort study | Hepatectomy + chemotherapy | Multivariate | 100 | 234 | Range (n): < 65, 164; ≥ 65, 70 | 126/108 | OS | 9 |
2 | Okimoto et al[35], 2017 | Japan | Cohort study | Hepatectomy + chemotherapy | Multivariate | 10 | 134 | Median (range): 63 (30-87) | 90/44 | OS | 8 |
3 | Kamphues et al[53], 2021 | Germany | Cohort Study | Hepatectomy | Multivariate | 6.15 | 1643 | Median (range): 62 (18-90) | 1018/625 | OS | 7 |
4 | Kawahara et al[36], 2018 | Japan | Cohort study | Hepatectomy | Univariate | 5/50 | 66 | Median (range): 65.2 (31-80) | 45/21 | RFS | 7 |
5 | Hof et al[54], 2016 | The Netherlands | Cohort study | Hepatectomy | Multivariate | 200 | 431 | mean ± SD: 62.9 ± 9.4 | 264/167 | OS | 8 |
6 | Chiang et al[37], 2019 | China | Cohort study | Hepatectomy + chemotherapy | Multivariate | 5 | 490 | Median (range): 60.3 (28.8-88.0) | 332/158 | RFS, OS | 8 |
7 | Peltonen et al[55], 2018 | Finland | Cohort study | Hepatectomy + chemotherapy | Univariate | 5 | 168 | Median (range): 64.3 (36.3-81.5) | 101/67 | OS, DFS | 8 |
8 | Lu et al[38], 2016 | China | Cohort study | Hepatectomy + chemotherapy | Univariate | 5 | 141 | Median (range): 60 (20-82) | 92/49 | OS | 7 |
9 | John et al[56], 2013 | United Kingdom | Cohort study | Hepatectomy + chemotherapy | Univariate | 200 | 432 | Median (range): 64.5 (29-85) | 289/143 | OS | 7 |
10 | Yi et al[39], 2013 | Korea | Cohort study | Hepatectomy + chemotherapy | Multivariate | 5 | 76 | Median (range): 57(31-75) | 47/29 | DFS | 8 |
11 | Gervaz et al[57], 2000 | Switzerland | Cohort study | Hepatectomy | Univariate | 4 | 49 | ≥ 18 | 35/14 | OS | 7 |
12 | Sasaki et al[40], 2005 | Japan | Cohort study | Hepatectomy | Multivariate | 10 | 103 | Range (n): ≤ 32, 164; > 60, 71 | 56/47 | OS | 9 |
13 | Wang et al[41], 2017 | China | Cohort study | Hepatectomy + chemotherapy | Multivariate | 5 | 159 | Median (range): Non-targeted therapy group 52 (35-83); bevacizumab combined treatment group 43 (32-71); cetuximab combined treatment group 59 (28-76) | 101/58 | RFS, OS | 8 |
14 | Takamizawa et al[42], 2022 | Japan | Cohort study | Hepatectomy | Multivariate | 5 | 554 | Median (range): 62 (21-88) | 358/196 | RFS, OS | 9 |
15 | Masuda et al[64], 2018 | United States | Cohort study | Hepatectomy + RFA | Multivariate | 30 | 116 | mean ± SD: tumors ≥ 4, 58.7 ± 10.6; tumors < 4, 57.6 ± 12.0 | 74/42 | OS | 7 |
16 | Zhang et al[43], 2017 | China | Cohort study | Hepatectomy | Multivariate | 100 | 102 | Range (n): < 60, 66; ≥ 60, 36 | 63/39 | OS | 9 |
17 | Ishii et al[44], 2022 | Japan | Cohort study | Hepatectomy | Univariate | 5 | 90 | Median (range): High CII 65 (31-87); low CII 65 (32-82) | 58/32 | RFS, OS | 7 |
18 | Tanaka et al[45], 2008 | Japan | Cohort study | Hepatectomy + chemotherapy | Multivariate | 12 | 79 | Range (n): ≥ 60, 46; < 60, 33 | 49/30 | OS | 9 |
19 | Sasaki et al[65], 2016 | United States | Cohort study | Hepatectomy + RFA | Multivariate | 30 | 485 | Median (IQR): 58.5 (49.1-66.5) | 290/195 | OS | 8 |
20 | Chen et al[46], 2020 | China | Cohort study | Hepatectomy + chemotherapy | Univariate | 10 | 141 | Median (IQR): 55 (49.0-62.0) | 92/49 | PFS, OS | 7 |
21 | Montalti et al[58], 2015 | Belgium | Cohort study | Hepatectomy + chemotherapy | Multivariate | 10 | 114 | mean ± SD: 66.4 ± 0.89 | 78/36 | OS, RFS | 6 |
22 | Reddy et al[67], 2009 | United States | Cohort study | Hepatectomy + chemotherapy | Multivariate | 200 | 499 | Median (range): 57(49-66) | 294/205 | OS | 6 |
23 | Reddy et al[66], 2009 | United States | Cohort study | Hepatectomy + chemotherapy | Multivariate | 10 | 230 | Median (range): 61(33-83) | 137/93 | OS | 7 |
24 | Li et al[47], 2023 | China | Cohort study | Hepatectomy + chemotherapy | Univariate | 200 | 431 | Median (IQR): 59 (49-68) | 282/149 | RFS, OS | 7 |
25 | Niu et al[68], 2007 | Australia | Cohort study | Hepatectomy | Multivariate | 5 | 315 | mean ± SD: 62 ± 11 | 239/176 | OS | 6 |
26 | Polivka et al[59], 2020 | The Czech Republic | Cohort study | Hepatectomy | Multivariate | 4.9 | 71 | Median (range): 62.7 (29-77) | 29/42 | DFS, OS | 6 |
27 | Takeda et al[48], 2022 | Japan | Cohort study | Hepatectomy + chemotherapy | Multivariate | 10 | 238 | Range (n): < 60, 123; ≥ 60, 115 | 184/54 | OS | 8 |
28 | Dumarco et al[69], 2023 | Brazil | Cohort study | Hepatectomy | Multivariate | 20 | 137 | Median (range): 58.2 (23-87) | 75/62 | OS, DFS | 8 |
29 | Kim et al[49], 2019 | Korea | Cohort study | Hepatectomy + chemotherapy | Multivariate | 100 | 83 | mean ± SD: 59.5 ± 10.0 | 62/21 | OS | 8 |
30 | Peng et al[50], 2017 | China | Cohort study | Hepatectomy | Univariate | 200 | 150 | Median (range): 58 (20-82) | 97/53 | RFS, OS | 7 |
31 | Imai et al[60], 2016 | France | Cohort study | Hepatectomy | Multivariate | 50 | 846 | Median (range): 61 (28-89) | 502/344 | OS | 8 |
32 | Pawlik et al[61], 2005 | Switzerland | Cohort study | Hepatectomy | Multivariate | 200 | 566 | Median 60 | 221/345 | OS | 6 |
33 | Miki et al[51], 2018 | Japan | Cohort study | Hepatectomy | Multivariate | 5 | 73 | Median (range): 59 (27-82) | 49/24 | DFS | 8 |
34 | Hohenberger et al[62], 1994 | Germany | Cohort study | Hepatectomy | Univariate | 5 | 166 | Median (range): 59 (30-79) | 99/67 | OS | 7 |
35 | Arru et al[65], 2008 | Italy | Cohort study | Hepatectomy | Multivariate | 5/200 | 297 | Range (n): < 65, 177; ≥ 65, 120 | 171/126 | OS | 8 |
36 | Yoshino et al[52], 2022 | Japan | Cohort study | Hepatectomy | Multivariate | 5 | 633 | Median (range): 64.0 (27.0-92.0) | 414/219 | RFS, OS | 8 |
Outcome | Number of studies | Model | Hazard ratio (95%CI) | P value | Heterogeneity (P value, I2) |
Pre-LR | |||||
OS | 28 | Fixed | 1.61 (1.49-1.75) | < 0.001 | 0.035, 34.9% |
Region | |||||
Europe | 8 | Fixed | 1.60 (1.41-1.82) | < 0.001 | 0.086, 42.3% |
Asia | 15 | Fixed | 1.43 (1.25-1.63) | < 0.001 | 0.377, 6.8% |
South America | 1 | Fixed | 1.31 (0.78-2.20) | 0.307 | / |
North America | 4 | Fixed | 2.21 (1.82-2.69) | < 0.001 | 0.980, 0.0% |
Treatment modality | |||||
LR alone | 12 | Fixed | 1.46 (1.31-1.64) | < 0.001 | 0.405, 4.1% |
LR + chemotherapy | 14 | Fixed | 1.74 (1.52-1.98) | < 0.001 | 0.053, 41.4% |
LR + radiofrequency ablation | 2 | Fixed | 2.18 (1.63-2.91) | < 0.001 | 0.844, 0.0% |
Analysis modality | |||||
Multivariate | 20 | Fixed | 1.70 (1.55-1.87) | < 0.001 | 0.099, 29.8% |
Univariate | 6 | Fixed | 1.23 (1.00-1.52) | 0.053 | 0.618, 0.0% |
Survival curve | 2 | Fixed | 1.62 (1.24-2.13) | < 0.001 | 0.067, 70.2% |
Cut-off | |||||
≤ 5 ng/mL | 9 | Fixed | 0.32 (0.21-0.43) | < 0.001 | 0.570, 0.0% |
5-50 ng/mL | 11 | Fixed | 0.54 (0.42-0.66) | < 0.001 | 0.034, 48.7% |
100 ng/mL | 3 | Fixed | 0.60 (0.11-1.09) | 0.017 | 0.407, 0.0% |
200 ng/mL | 6 | Fixed | 0.65 (0.45-0.84) | < 0.001 | 0.565, 0.0% |
DFS | 4 | Random | 1.49 (0.97-2.29) | 0.067 | 0.109, 50.4% |
Region | |||||
South America | 1 | Random | 1.89 (1.13-3.15) | 0.015 | / |
Asia | 1 | Random | 1.27 (0.63-2.57) | 0.507 | / |
Europe | 2 | Random | 1.65 (0.55-4.93) | 0.373 | 0.049, 74.2% |
Treatment modality | |||||
LR alone | 3 | Random | 1.81 (1.20-2.72) | 0.005 | 0.340, 7.4% |
LR + chemotherapy | 1 | Random | 1.04 (0.71-1.53) | 0.833 | / |
Analysis modality | |||||
Multivariate | 3 | Random | 1.81 (1.20-2.72) | 0.005 | 0.340, 7.4% |
Univariate | 1 | Random | 1.04 (0.71-1.53) | 0.833 | / |
Cut-off | |||||
> 5 ng/mL | 1 | Random | 1.89 (1.13-3.15) | 0.015 | / |
≤ 5 ng/mL | 3 | Random | 1.37 (0.80-2.35) | 0.255 | 0.142, 48.7% |
RFS | 8 | Fixed | 1.27 (1.11-1.45) | < 0.001 | 0.117, 37.8% |
Region | |||||
Asia | 7 | Fixed | 1.25 (1.09-1.43) | 0.001 | 0.101, 41.6% |
Europe | 1 | Fixed | 1.71 (0.90-3.24) | 0.101 | / |
Treatment modality | |||||
LR alone | 5 | Fixed | 1.32 (1.14-1.53) | < 0.001 | 0.176, 34.8% |
LR + chemotherapy | 3 | Fixed | 1.10 (0.83-1.47) | 0.509 | 0.135, 50.1% |
Analysis modality | |||||
Univariate | 3 | Fixed | 1.07 (0.76-1.49) | 0.709 | 0.569, 0.0% |
Survival curve | 1 | Fixed | 1.85 (0.99-3.47) | 0.055 | / |
Multivariate | 4 | Fixed | 1.29 (1.11-1.49) | 0.001 | 0.030, 66.5% |
Cut-off | |||||
≤ 5 ng/mL | 5 | Fixed | 0.22 (0.08-0.37) | 0.003 | 0.060, 55.7% |
5-50 ng/mL | 2 | Fixed | 0.62 (0.12-1.13) | 0.016 | 0.669, 0.0% |
200 ng/mL | 2 | Fixed | 0.11 (-0.32 to 0.54) | 0.615 | 0.313, 1.9% |
Post-LR | |||||
OS | 8 | Random | 2.66 (2.10-3.38) | < 0.001 | 0.002, 68.7% |
Region | |||||
Asia | 2 | Random | 2.63 (1.87-3.70) | < 0.001 | 0.040, 76.2% |
Europe | 5 | Random | 3.04 (2.10-4.40) | < 0.001 | 0.022, 65.1% |
Oceania | 1 | Random | 1.63 (1.09-2.42) | 0.016 | / |
Treatment modality | |||||
LR + chemotherapy | 2 | Random | 2.75 (1.70-4.44) | < 0.001 | 0.046, 74.8% |
LR alone | 6 | Random | 2.66 (1.91-3.69) | < 0.001 | 0.003, 71.9% |
Analysis modality | |||||
Multivariate | 5 | Random | 2.23 (1.79-2.78) | < 0.001 | 0.061, 55.7% |
Survival curve | 2 | Random | 4.40 (2.58-7.51) | < 0.001 | 0.215, 35.0% |
Univariate | 1 | Random | 3.68 (2.35-5.79) | < 0.001 | / |
Cut-off | |||||
≤ 5 ng/mL | 6 | Random | 1.07 (0.78-1.37) | < 0.001 | 0.001, 74.9% |
5-50 ng/mL | 1 | Random | 0.74 (0.36-1.13) | < 0.001 | / |
200 ng/mL | 1 | Random | 0.64 (0.10-1.17) | 0.019 | / |
DFS | 2 | Fixed | 3.23 (2.20-4.75) | < 0.001 | 0.182, 43.8% |
RFS | 2 | Fixed | 2.38 (2.05-2.77) | < 0.001 | 0.160, 49.3% |
- Citation: Tang F, Huang CW, Tang ZH, Lu SL, Bai T, Huang Q, Li XZ, Zhang B, Wu FX. Prognostic role of serum carcinoembryonic antigen in patients receiving liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastasis: A meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(12): 2890-2906
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v15/i12/2890.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i12.2890