Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2023; 15(11): 2490-2499
Published online Nov 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i11.2490
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study patients

Collateral branch (n = 26)
No collateral branch (n = 108)
P value
Sex (male/female)24/2 (92.3/7.7%)95/13 (88.0/12.0%)0.776
Age (yr)152.3 ± 10.755.7 ± 10.60.143
Indications (n)0.865
    Gastrointestinal bleeding1760
    Refractory ascites739
    Both15
    Other conditions14
Child-Puph score17.2 ± 1.77.3 ± 1.70.878
Child-Pugh class0.644
    A8 (30.8%)44 (40.7%)
    B15 (57.7%)53 (49.1%)
    C3 (11.5%)11 (10.2%)
Hepatocellular carcinoma3 (11.5%)12 (11.1%)> 0.999
Table 2 Differences between wedged hepatic venous pressure and portal venous pressure and between hepatic venous pressure gradient and portal venous pressure gradient in patients with and without collateral branches
WHVP (mmHg)PVP (mmHg)P value95%CIHVPG (mmHg)PPG (mmHg)P value95%CI
With collateral branches (n = 26)20.89 ± 6.6934.96 ± 8.08< 0.00110.52-17.639.86 ± 7.4425.94 ± 7.42< 0.00112.30-19.86
No collateral branch (n = 108)30.65 ± 8.1733.25 ± 6.600.0020.99-4.2018.67 ± 9.0524.44 ± 6.79< 0.0013.91-7.64
Total (n = 134)28.70 ± 8.7833.58 ± 6.91< 0.0013.18-6.4616.96 ± 9.4124.73 ± 6.92< 0.0015.98-9.57
Table 3 Relationships between wedged hepatic venous pressure and portal venous pressure and between hepatic venous pressure gradient and portal venous pressure gradient in patients with and without collateral branches
WHVP and PVP
HVPG and PPG
r
R2
P value
95% LoA (mmHg)
r
R2
P value
95% LoA (mmHg)
With collateral branches (n = 26)0.3030.0920.133-3.16-31.310.2080.0430.309-2.25-34.40
No collateral branch (n = 108)0.3680.135< 0.001-13.88-19.070.2630.0690.006-13.41-24.95
Total (n = 134)0.2700.0730.002-23.64-13.990.2010.0400.020-28.35-12.80