Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2023; 15(10): 2294-2304
Published online Oct 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2294
Table 1 Predictive factors of lymph node metastasis in early esophageal cancer
Category
ESCC
EAC
ImagingCTThe intrathoracic and abdominal nodes larger than 10 mm in the short axis, supraclavicular nodes greater than 5 mm and retrocrural nodes greater than 6 mm
EUSRegional lymph node metastasis: (1) Size greater than 10 mm, (2) a round shape, (3) sharply demarcated borders, and (4) hypoechoic structure
Serum markersTK1 ≥ 3.38 pmol/L; CYFRA21-1 > 3.30 ng/mL; stathmin-1NA
MicroRNA-218
Postoperative pathology and immunohistochemical analysisDepth of invasion; tumor size; histological differentiation grade; angiolymphatic invasion; neural invasion; expression of PIM-1
Overexpression of cortactin; the protein levels of mixed-lineage leukaemia 2; the expression of stanniocalcin-1Transcriptions of CD69, MYD88 and TLR4; low expression of olfactomedin 4
Table 2 Models predicting lymph node metastasis in early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Number
Ref.
Year
Factors
Category
Training set
Validation set
Cutoff value
C-index (95%CI)
Cutoff value
C-index (95%CI)
1Jia et al[43]2016Depth of invasion and lymphovascular metastasisLogistic regression modelNA0.858 (0.757-0.959)NANA
2Zhou et al[42]2019Dumor size, tumor grade, depth of invasion, and angiolymphatic invasionLogistic regression model20%0.80 (0.737-0.862)20%0.814 (0.724-0.905)
3NomogramNA0.80 (0.739-0.856)NA0.814 (0.725-0.900)
4Zheng et al[40]2018Depth of tumor invasion, grade of differentiation, tumor size, and lymphovascular invasionNomogram0.1420.790 (0.717-0.864)0.2240.789 (0.709-0.869)
5Chen et al [39]2020Tumor size, histologic grade, invasion depth, lymphovascular invasion, CT-results, and alcohol takingLogistic regression model3.7350.857 (NA)3.7350.881 (NA)
6artificial neural networkNA0.904 (NA)NA0.938 (NA)