Wang YY, Fu HJ. Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(10): 2171-2178 [PMID: 37969718 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2171]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Hua-Jun Fu, MM, Doctor, Department of Anesthesiology, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, No. 256 Youyi West Road, Xi'an 710068, Shaanxi Province, China. fuhuajun497055726@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Anesthesiology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2023; 15(10): 2171-2178 Published online Oct 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2171
Table 1 Comparison of general data between two groups
Group
Gender (male/female)
Age (yr, mean ± SD)
BMI (kg/m2, mean ± SD)
ASA grade (I/II)
Operation time (min, mean ± SD)
Intraoperative bleeding (mL, mean ± SD)
Sufentanil consumption (μg, mean ± SD)
TAPB group (n = 45)
25/20
59.56 ± 6.82
23.08 ± 0.58
23/22
148.52 ± 22.63
135.81 ± 22.56
25.36 ± 4.88
Epidural anesthesia group (n = 40)
23/17
59.08 ± 6.94
22.84 ± 0.65
21/19
150.97 ± 20.51
136.44 ± 22.79
27.12 ± 4.15
Statistical value
0.033
0.321
1.799
0.017
0.521
0.128
1.779
P value
0.857
0.749
0.076
0.898
0.604
0.899
0.079
Table 2 Comparison of visual analog scale scores between two groups (points, mean ± SD)
Group
6 h after surgery
12 h after surgery
24 h after surgery
48 h after surgery
TAPB group (n = 45)
2.53 ± 0.44
2.31 ± 0.39
2.01 ± 0.31
1.32 ± 0.29
Epidural anesthesia group (n = 40)
2.78 ± 0.39
2.69 ± 0.45
2.55 ± 0.37
1.92 ± 0.36
t value
2.757
4.171
7.319
8.501
P value
0.007
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
Table 3 Comparison of cognitive function between two groups
Group
Incidence of POCD, n (%)
MMSE score
Before surgery
24 h after surgery
TAPB group (n = 45)
2 (4.44)
27.94 ± 0.78
25.63 ± 1.25
Epidural anesthesia group (n = 40)
9 (22.50)
27.82 ± 0.84
24.45 ± 2.97
Statistical value
6.128
0.683
2.435
P value
0.013
0.497
0.017
Table 4 Comparison of intestinal barrier function indicators between two groups (mg/L, mean ± SD)
Group
DAO
D-LA
Before surgery
24 h after surgery
Before surgery
24 h after surgery
TAPB group (n = 45)
4.64 ± 0.85
3.17 ± 0.72
5.28 ± 0.67
4.21 ± 0.44
Epidural anesthesia group (n = 40)
4.52 ± 0.91
3.85 ± 0.64
5.09 ± 0.78
4.63 ± 0.32
t value
0.628
4.578
1.208
4.978
P value
0.531
< 0.001
0.230
< 0.001
Table 5 Comparison of postoperative recovery quality between two groups
Group
Agitation score
Incidence of agitation during the recovery period, n (%)
TAPB group (n = 45)
4.21 ± 0.85
0 (0.00)
Epidural anesthesia group (n = 40)
5.08 ± 0.66
5 (12.50)
Statistical value
5.222
5.977
P value
< 0.001
0.015
Table 6 Comparison of postoperative complication rates between two groups
Group
Nausea and vomiting (cases)
Respiratory depression (cases)
Hypotension (cases)
Total incidence rate (%)
TAPB group (n = 45)
2
0
0
4.44
Epidural anesthesia group (n = 40)
5
0
3
20.00
χ2 value
4.936
P value
0.026
Citation: Wang YY, Fu HJ. Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(10): 2171-2178