Ji X, Yang Z, Ma SR, Jia W, Zhao Q, Xu L, Kan Y, Cao Y, Wang Y, Fan BJ. New common bile duct morphological subtypes: Risk predictors of common bile duct stone recurrence. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14(3): 236-246 [PMID: 35432763 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i3.236]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Zhuo Yang, MD, Chief Doctor, Department of Digestive Endoscopy, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, No. 83 Wenhua Road, Shenyang 110840, Liaoning Province, China. yangzhuocy@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2022; 14(3): 236-246 Published online Mar 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i3.236
Table 1 Patient characteristics
Characteristics
n (%)
Patients
502
Recurrence
43 (8.6)
Multiple recurrences
9 (1.8)
Male
287 (57.2)
Age (mean ± SD, yr)
65.2 ± 15.6
Age 70 yr
201 (40.0)
PAD
243 (48.4)
CBD diameter (mean ± SD, cm)
1.3 ± 0.7
CBD diameter 1.5 cm
160 (31.9)
Largest CBD stone diameter 1.5 cm
83 (16.3)
CBD stone number 2
189 (37.6)
Muddy stones
131 (26.1)
Initial ampullary intervention
EST
141 (28.1)
EPBD/EPLBD
31 (6.2)
ESBD
315 (62.7)
CBD morphology
Straight type
289 (57.6)
S type
45 (9.0)
Polyline type
168 (33.5)
Cholecystectomy
26 (5.2)
Gastrectomy
9 (1.8)
Procedure time (mean ± SD, min)
20.0 ± 13.7
Table 2 Patient characteristics of patients with and without common bile duct stone recurrence, n (%)
Characteristics
Recurrence (n = 43)
Nonrecurrence (n = 459)
P value
Sex (male/female)
23/20
264/195
0.61
Age ≥ 70 yr
25 (58.1)
176 (38.3)
0.01
PAD
23 (53.5)
220 (47.9)
0.49
CBD diameter (mean ± SD, cm)
1.5 ± 0.5
1.3 ± 0.7
0.06
CBD diameter ≥ 1.5 cm
23 (53.5)
137 (29.8)
< 0.01
Largest CBD stone diameter ≥ 1.5 cm
11 (25.6)
71 (15.5)
0.09
CBD stone number ≥ 2
15 (34.9)
174 (37.9)
0.70
Muddy stones
12 (27.9)
119 (25.9)
0.78
Initial ampullary intervention
EST
13 (30.2)
128 (27.9)
0.74
EPBD/EPLBD
9 (20.9)
22 (4.8)
< 0.01
ESBD
17 (39.5)
298 (64.9)
< 0.01
CBD morphology
< 0.01
Straight type
14 (32.6)
275 (59.9)
S type
11 (25.6)
34 (7.4)
Polyline type
18 (41.9)
150 (32.7)
Cholecystectomy
5 (11.6)
21 (4.6)
0.06
Procedure time (mean ± SD, min)
19.3 ± 14.2
20.1 ± 13.6
0.71
Gastrectomy
3 (7.0)
6 (1.3)
0.03
Table 3 Patient characteristics of patients with different common bile duct morphologies, n (%)
Characteristics
Straight type (n = 289)
S type (n = 45)
Polyline type (n = 168)
P value
Sex (male/female)
166/123
30/15
91/77
0.32
Age ≥ 70 yr
104 (36.0)
20 (44.4)
77 (45.8)
0.10
PAD
136 (47.1)
20 (44.4)
87 (51.8)
0.53
CBD diameter (mean ± SD, cm)
1.3 ± 0.4
1.5 ± 0.5
1.4 ± 0.9
0.14
CBD diameter ≥ 1.5 cm
96 (33.2)
22 (48.9)
42 (25.0)
0.01
Largest CBD stone diameter ≥ 1.5 cm
42 (14.5)
8 (17.8)
32 (19.0)
0.44
CBD stone number ≥ 2
105 (36.3)
17 (37.8)
67 (39.9)
0.75
Muddy stones
78 (27.0)
11 (24.4)
42 (25.0)
0.87
Initial ampullary intervention
EST
84 (29.1)
11 (24.4)
46 (27.4)
0.79
EPBD/EPLBD
18 (6.2)
3 (6.7)
10 (6.0)
0.98
ESBD
180 (62.3)
30 (66.7)
105 (62.5)
0.85
Cholecystectomy
19 (6.6)
2 (4.4)
5 (3.0)
0.24
Procedure time (mean ± SD, min)
19.8 ± 11.7
19.7 ± 13.1
20.6 ± 16.7
0.81
Gastrectomy
5 (1.7)
0 (0.0)
4 (2.4)
0.38
Table 4 Characteristics of patients with single recurrence and multiple recurrences, n (%)
Characteristics
Single recurrence (n = 34)
Multiple recurrences (n = 9)
P value
Sex (male/female)
19/15
4/5
0.71
Age (mean ± SD, yr)
71.3 ± 13.7
68.6 ± 12.2
0.59
Age ≥ 70 yr
21 (61.8)
4 (44.4)
0.46
PAD
21 (61.8)
2 (22.2)
0.06
CBD diameter (mean ± SD, cm)
1.5 ± 0.5
1.6 ± 0.6
0.43
CBD diameter ≥ 1.5 cm
18 (52.9)
5 (55.6)
1.00
Largest CBD stone diameter ≥ 1.5 cm
10 (29.4)
1 (11.1)
0.41
CBD stone number ≥ 2
12 (35.3)
3 (33.3)
1.00
Muddy stones
10 (29.4)
2 (22.2)
1.00
Initial ampullary intervention
EST
10 (29.4)
3 (33.3)
1.00
EPBD/EPLBD
6 (17.6)
3 (33.3)
0.37
ESBD
16 (47.1)
1 (11.1)
0.07
CBD morphology
0.22
straight type
12 (35.3)
2 (22.2)
S type
10 (29.4)
1 (11.1)
polyline type
12 (35.3)
6 (66.7)
Cholecystectomy
5 (14.7)
0 (0.0)
0.57
Gastrectomy
3 (8.8)
0 (0.0)
1.00
Procedure time (mean ± SD, min)
19.9 ± 15.7
17.0 ± 6.3
0.60
Table 5 Risk factors for common bile duct stone recurrence
Factor
B
OR (95%CI)
P value
B
OR (95%CI)
P value
Age ≥ 70yr
0.69
1.99 (0.99-4.00)
0.06
CBD diameter ≥ 1.5 cm
0.79
2.20 (1.08-4.46)
0.03
EPBD/EPLBD
0.92
2.51 (0.89-7.06)
0.08
ESBD
-1.04
0.35 (0.17-0.75)
< 0.01
Gastrectomy
1.46
4.29 (0.84-21.83)
0.08
CBD morphology
< 0.01
< 0.01
Straight type
Reference
-0.90
0.41 (0.19-0.88)
0.02
S type
1.89
6.61 (2.61-16.77)
< 0.01
0.99
2.70 (1.08-6.73)
0.03
Polyline type
0.90
2.45 (1.14-5.26)
0.02
Reference
Citation: Ji X, Yang Z, Ma SR, Jia W, Zhao Q, Xu L, Kan Y, Cao Y, Wang Y, Fan BJ. New common bile duct morphological subtypes: Risk predictors of common bile duct stone recurrence. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14(3): 236-246