Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2021; 13(11): 1372-1389
Published online Nov 27, 2021. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1372
Table 1 The definitions of primary endpoints and secondary endpoints
Endpoints
Definition
Primary endpoints
Composite endpoint consisting of mortality and severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa)There are five grades of Clavien-Dindo Classification: Grade I, any complication that deviates from the natural course after surgery; Grade II, medications other than those permitted for Grade I complications are required; Grade III, surgical, endoscopic, and radiotherapy are required, including Grade IIIa (no general anesthesia is required) and IIIb (need for general anesthesia); Grade IV, life-threatening complication, including Grade IVa (single organ dysfunction) and IVb (multi-organ dysfunction) that require intermittent monitoring or ICU treatment; Grade V, death
Secondary endpoints
New-onset organ failureNew-onset failure of one or more organs in the 24 h prior to the first intervention
Pulmonary failurePartial pressure of oxygen (PO2) < 60 mmHg with or without partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) > 50 mmHg, or need for mechanical ventilation
Circulatory failureBlood pressure < 90/60 mmHg, or need for inotropic catecholamine to maintain blood pressure
Renal failureThe level of creatinine (Cr) > 177 μmoL/L, or need for hemofiltration or hemodialysis
Postoperative intra-abdominal bleedingNeed for operation, radiological, or endoscopic intervention
Pancreatic fistulaDrainage fluid amylase level more than 3 times that of serum amylase
Enterocutaneous fistulaIntestinal contents, including intestinal fluids, food residues, and feces, break through the intestinal wall (small bowel or large bowel) and leak into the abdominal cavity or outside the body. It can also be confirmed by radiology or surgery
Viscera perforationNeed for operation, radiological, or endoscopic intervention
Endocrine insufficiencyOral hypoglycemic drugs or insulin therapy for at least 6 mo, with no need to take these drugs before the onset of AP
Pancreatic enzymeClinical symptoms were improved by oral pancreatic enzyme use for more than 6 mo, with no need to take this drug before the onset of AP
Recurrent pancreatitisA history of two or more episodes with and interval of at least 3 mo
Chronic pancreatitisPatients experience abdominal pain, weight loss, diabetes, and fatty diarrhea. The condition is also confirmed by radiological and laboratory examinations. The symptoms did not occur before the onset of AP
Incisional herniaSix months after discharge, the full-thickness abdominal wall is discontinuous and abdominal contents bulge, with or without obstruction
Pancreatic portal hypertensionAP causes splenic vein thrombosis, which causes obstruction of splenic venous return
Table 2 Baseline characteristics of infectious necrotizing pancreatitis patients who underwent necrosectomy
Groups
“One-step” approach (n = 61)
“Step-up” approach (n = 97)
P value
Baseline characteristics
Sex 0.61
Female1934
Male4263
Age (yr)52.16 ± 11.5150.57 ± 13.710.45
BMI (kg/m2)26.20 ± 3.7825.91 ± 3.910.73
Cause of AP0.36
Gallstone3148
Alcohol32
Hyperlipidaemia1534
Others1213
Concomitant disease0.15
Cardiovascular disease2937
Pulmonary disease813
Chronic renal insufficiency421
Diabetes1316
Others710
ASA score0.42
I: Healthy status3058
II: Mild systemic status3038
III: Severe systemic status11
APACHE-II score13.9 ± 5.114.2 ± 5.40.71
CT severity index6.65 ± 2.557.19 ± 2.180.18
Severity of AP0.79
Moderately AP2745
Severely AP3452
Extent of pancreatic necrosis0.07
< 30%3541
30%-50%1133
> 50%1523
Preoperative inflammatory indicators
White blood cells (109/L)11.04 ± 6.3111.33 ± 6.030.77
Neutrophil percentage (%)80.86 ± 8.379.57 ± 8.90.36
C-reactive protein (mg/L)115.3 ± 81.8118.5 ± 85.70.81
Procalcitonin (ng/mL)1.18 ± 1.01.08 ± 2.20.73
Interleukin 6 (pg/mL)113 ± 91.8116 ± 95.10.93
Organ failure0.49
Single1014
Multiple514
None4669
Time from onset of disease to admission (days)32.20 ± 20.7553.69 ± 38.14< 0.001
Time from onset of disease to initial surgical treatment (days)54.38 ± 10.4676.58 ± 17.03< 0.001
Tertiary referral (%)56 (91.8%)96 (98.9%)0.06
Table 3 Comparison of perioperative clinical outcomes between the “One-step” approach and the “Step-up” approach
Group
“One-step” approach (n = 61)
“Step-up” approach (n = 97)
P value
Outcomes
Primary composite outcomes
Severe complications or death, n (%)111 (18)20 (20.6)0.69
Secondary outcomes
New-onset organ failure10180.73
Pulmonary612
Cardiovascular810
Renal13
Single-organ failure5120.41
Multiple-organ failure560.63
Death8120.89
Postoperative intraabdominal bleeding250.58
Pancreatic fistula16280.72
Enterocutaneous fistula or Viscera perforation350.95
Surgical approach0.77
Trans-lesser sac4039
Retroperitoneal1720
Combined46
Length of stay in ICU after operation (days)10.9 ± 22.714.4 ± 26.10.18
Total length of ICU stay (days)22.5 ± 30.125.7 ± 28.70.43
Total length of hospital stay (days)52.76 ± 24.7165.41 ± 28.140.02
Number of operations 2.89 ± 1.233.42 ± 1.690.65
Operation time (min)82.19 ± 29.3487.01 ± 30.120.92
Number of interventions3.18 ± 1.394.26 ± 1.710.000
Blood loss during the operation (mL)49.5 ± 58.355.5 ± 72.10.51
Number of drainage tubes3.9 ± 1.04.43 ± 1.770.04
Table 4 The changes of inflammatory indicators and vital signs between two surgical approaches during the perioperative period
Groups
“One-step” approach (n = 61)
“Step-up” approach (n = 97)
P value
Indicators
Preoperative inflammatory indicators
White blood cells (109/L)11.04 ± 6.3111.33 ± 6.030.77
Neutrophil percentage (%)80.86 ± 8.379.57 ± 8.90.36
C-reactive protein (mg/L)115.3 ± 81.8118.5 ± 85.70.81
Procalcitonin (ng/mL)1.18 ± 1.01.08 ± 2.20.73
Interleukin-6 (pg/mL)113 ± 91.8116 ± 95.10.93
Preoperative vital signs
Body temperature (℃)38.5 ± 0.638.0 ± 0.80.94
Respiratory frequency (times/min)25.8 ± 4.823.1 ± 4.90.67
Heart rate (times/min)116.1 ± 14.2107 ± 15.10.33
Inflammatory indicators on the 3rd postoperative day
White blood cells (109/L)9.91 ± 4.510.1 ± 4.40.54
Neutrophil percentage (%)78.9 ± 6.878.1 ± 7.20.97
C-reactive protein (mg/L)91.6 ± 40.691.1 ± 53.30.92
Procalcitonin (ng/mL)0.84 ± 0.60.79 ± 0.50.71
Interleukin-6 (pg/mL)91.2 ± 60.294.7 ± 68.40.31
Vital signs on the 3rd postoperative day
Body temperature (℃)38.1 ± 0.437.8 ± 0.70.49
Respiratory frequency (times/min)23.8 ± 6.122.7 ± 4.30.86
Heart rate (times/min)105.1 ± 21.9100 ± 24.90.68
Inflammatory indicators on the 7th postoperative day
White blood cells (109/L)7.51 ± 3.07.48 ± 2.40.96
Neutrophil percentage (%)69.30 ± 6.165.14 ± 7.80.43
C-reactive protein (mg/L)62.63 ± 25.668.05 ± 38.10.54
Procalcitonin (ng/mL)0.37 ± 0.30.31 ± 0.20.94
Interleukin-6 (pg/mL)46.3 ± 22.649.7 ± 27.40.48
Vital signs on the 7th postoperative day
Body temperature (℃)37.0 ± 0.637.3 ± 0.40.95
Respiratory frequency (times/min)19.4 ± 2.319.1 ± 2.80.83
Heart rate (times/min)90.1 ± 13.785.2 ± 14.10.61
Table 5 The long-term complication between the two surgical approaches during the follow-up period
Groups
“One-step” approach (n = 40)
“Step-up” approach (n = 63)
P value
Long-term complications
New-onset endocrine insufficiency, n (%)
Number of patients12 (30)28 (45)0.143
Oral medication9 (75)20 (71.4)
Insulin5 (41.7)13 (46.4)
Exocrine insufficiency, n (%)
Fecal elastase-1, mean value254.1 ± 107.8257.9 ± 93.30.85
Fecal elastase-1 < 200 μg/g, n (%)14 (35)21 (33.3)0.86
Pancreatic enzyme, n (%)8 (20)11 (20.8)0.93
Recurrent pancreatitis, n (%)7(17.5)13(20.6)0.69
Chronic pancreatitis, n (%)4 (10)7 (11.1)0.86
Incisional hernia, n (%)9 (20.5)4 (6.3)0.03
Clinical symptoms, n (%)
Diarrhea16 (40)23 (36.5)0.72
Bloating21(52.5)28(44.4)0.43
Abdominal pain10 (25)13 (20.6)0.60
Weight loss31 (77.5)47 (74.6)0.74
Pancreatic pseudocyst, n (%)2 (5)5 (7.9)0.56
Pancreatic portal hypertension, n (%)2 (5)3 (4.8)0.96
Pancreatic cancer, n (%)00-
Table 6 Quality of life rating scale during the follow-up period every 6 mo after treatment of surviving acute pancreatitis patients with the “One-step” approach or “Step-up” approach
Groups
“One-step” approach (n = 40)
“Step-up” approach (n = 63)
P value
Rating scale
SF-36 physical health score140 ± 941 ± 70.61
SF-36 mental health score147 ± 1349 ± 130.58
EQ-5D health status score275 ± 2076 ± 180.76
Izbicki pain score323 ± 2621 ± 240.87
Table 7 The comparison of perioperative medical costs between two surgical approaches
Groups
“One-step” approach (n = 61)
“Step-up” approach (n = 97)
P value
Medical costs
Surgical costs1 (RMB)18582.37 ± 5918.4529641.63 ± 6795.11< 0.001
ICU costs (RMB)276812.39 ± 183417.12281133.73 ± 193252.470.87
Perioperative medical total costs (RMB)2529958.23 ± 171128.74569768.07 ± 193184.680.34
Follow-up costs per year
Outpatient costs (RMB)2040.79 ± 519.482169.08 ± 463.710.71
Auxiliary examination costs3 (RMB)9751.96 ± 1012.379003.65 ± 1102.290.58
Drug costs4 (RMB)2855.36 ± 318.122994.21 ± 372.950.82