Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2021; 13(11): 1372-1389
Published online Nov 27, 2021. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1372
Published online Nov 27, 2021. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1372
Table 1 The definitions of primary endpoints and secondary endpoints
Endpoints | Definition |
Primary endpoints | |
Composite endpoint consisting of mortality and severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa) | There are five grades of Clavien-Dindo Classification: Grade I, any complication that deviates from the natural course after surgery; Grade II, medications other than those permitted for Grade I complications are required; Grade III, surgical, endoscopic, and radiotherapy are required, including Grade IIIa (no general anesthesia is required) and IIIb (need for general anesthesia); Grade IV, life-threatening complication, including Grade IVa (single organ dysfunction) and IVb (multi-organ dysfunction) that require intermittent monitoring or ICU treatment; Grade V, death |
Secondary endpoints | |
New-onset organ failure | New-onset failure of one or more organs in the 24 h prior to the first intervention |
Pulmonary failure | Partial pressure of oxygen (PO2) < 60 mmHg with or without partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) > 50 mmHg, or need for mechanical ventilation |
Circulatory failure | Blood pressure < 90/60 mmHg, or need for inotropic catecholamine to maintain blood pressure |
Renal failure | The level of creatinine (Cr) > 177 μmoL/L, or need for hemofiltration or hemodialysis |
Postoperative intra-abdominal bleeding | Need for operation, radiological, or endoscopic intervention |
Pancreatic fistula | Drainage fluid amylase level more than 3 times that of serum amylase |
Enterocutaneous fistula | Intestinal contents, including intestinal fluids, food residues, and feces, break through the intestinal wall (small bowel or large bowel) and leak into the abdominal cavity or outside the body. It can also be confirmed by radiology or surgery |
Viscera perforation | Need for operation, radiological, or endoscopic intervention |
Endocrine insufficiency | Oral hypoglycemic drugs or insulin therapy for at least 6 mo, with no need to take these drugs before the onset of AP |
Pancreatic enzyme | Clinical symptoms were improved by oral pancreatic enzyme use for more than 6 mo, with no need to take this drug before the onset of AP |
Recurrent pancreatitis | A history of two or more episodes with and interval of at least 3 mo |
Chronic pancreatitis | Patients experience abdominal pain, weight loss, diabetes, and fatty diarrhea. The condition is also confirmed by radiological and laboratory examinations. The symptoms did not occur before the onset of AP |
Incisional hernia | Six months after discharge, the full-thickness abdominal wall is discontinuous and abdominal contents bulge, with or without obstruction |
Pancreatic portal hypertension | AP causes splenic vein thrombosis, which causes obstruction of splenic venous return |
Table 2 Baseline characteristics of infectious necrotizing pancreatitis patients who underwent necrosectomy
Groups | “One-step” approach (n = 61) | “Step-up” approach (n = 97) | P value | |
Baseline characteristics | ||||
Sex | 0.61 | |||
Female | 19 | 34 | ||
Male | 42 | 63 | ||
Age (yr) | 52.16 ± 11.51 | 50.57 ± 13.71 | 0.45 | |
BMI (kg/m2) | 26.20 ± 3.78 | 25.91 ± 3.91 | 0.73 | |
Cause of AP | 0.36 | |||
Gallstone | 31 | 48 | ||
Alcohol | 3 | 2 | ||
Hyperlipidaemia | 15 | 34 | ||
Others | 12 | 13 | ||
Concomitant disease | 0.15 | |||
Cardiovascular disease | 29 | 37 | ||
Pulmonary disease | 8 | 13 | ||
Chronic renal insufficiency | 4 | 21 | ||
Diabetes | 13 | 16 | ||
Others | 7 | 10 | ||
ASA score | 0.42 | |||
I: Healthy status | 30 | 58 | ||
II: Mild systemic status | 30 | 38 | ||
III: Severe systemic status | 1 | 1 | ||
APACHE-II score | 13.9 ± 5.1 | 14.2 ± 5.4 | 0.71 | |
CT severity index | 6.65 ± 2.55 | 7.19 ± 2.18 | 0.18 | |
Severity of AP | 0.79 | |||
Moderately AP | 27 | 45 | ||
Severely AP | 34 | 52 | ||
Extent of pancreatic necrosis | 0.07 | |||
< 30% | 35 | 41 | ||
30%-50% | 11 | 33 | ||
> 50% | 15 | 23 | ||
Preoperative inflammatory indicators | ||||
White blood cells (109/L) | 11.04 ± 6.31 | 11.33 ± 6.03 | 0.77 | |
Neutrophil percentage (%) | 80.86 ± 8.3 | 79.57 ± 8.9 | 0.36 | |
C-reactive protein (mg/L) | 115.3 ± 81.8 | 118.5 ± 85.7 | 0.81 | |
Procalcitonin (ng/mL) | 1.18 ± 1.0 | 1.08 ± 2.2 | 0.73 | |
Interleukin 6 (pg/mL) | 113 ± 91.8 | 116 ± 95.1 | 0.93 | |
Organ failure | 0.49 | |||
Single | 10 | 14 | ||
Multiple | 5 | 14 | ||
None | 46 | 69 | ||
Time from onset of disease to admission (days) | 32.20 ± 20.75 | 53.69 ± 38.14 | < 0.001 | |
Time from onset of disease to initial surgical treatment (days) | 54.38 ± 10.46 | 76.58 ± 17.03 | < 0.001 | |
Tertiary referral (%) | 56 (91.8%) | 96 (98.9%) | 0.06 |
Table 3 Comparison of perioperative clinical outcomes between the “One-step” approach and the “Step-up” approach
Group | “One-step” approach (n = 61) | “Step-up” approach (n = 97) | P value | |
Outcomes | ||||
Primary composite outcomes | ||||
Severe complications or death, n (%)1 | 11 (18) | 20 (20.6) | 0.69 | |
Secondary outcomes | ||||
New-onset organ failure | 10 | 18 | 0.73 | |
Pulmonary | 6 | 12 | ||
Cardiovascular | 8 | 10 | ||
Renal | 1 | 3 | ||
Single-organ failure | 5 | 12 | 0.41 | |
Multiple-organ failure | 5 | 6 | 0.63 | |
Death | 8 | 12 | 0.89 | |
Postoperative intraabdominal bleeding | 2 | 5 | 0.58 | |
Pancreatic fistula | 16 | 28 | 0.72 | |
Enterocutaneous fistula or Viscera perforation | 3 | 5 | 0.95 | |
Surgical approach | 0.77 | |||
Trans-lesser sac | 40 | 39 | ||
Retroperitoneal | 17 | 20 | ||
Combined | 4 | 6 | ||
Length of stay in ICU after operation (days) | 10.9 ± 22.7 | 14.4 ± 26.1 | 0.18 | |
Total length of ICU stay (days) | 22.5 ± 30.1 | 25.7 ± 28.7 | 0.43 | |
Total length of hospital stay (days) | 52.76 ± 24.71 | 65.41 ± 28.14 | 0.02 | |
Number of operations | 2.89 ± 1.23 | 3.42 ± 1.69 | 0.65 | |
Operation time (min) | 82.19 ± 29.34 | 87.01 ± 30.12 | 0.92 | |
Number of interventions | 3.18 ± 1.39 | 4.26 ± 1.71 | 0.000 | |
Blood loss during the operation (mL) | 49.5 ± 58.3 | 55.5 ± 72.1 | 0.51 | |
Number of drainage tubes | 3.9 ± 1.0 | 4.43 ± 1.77 | 0.04 |
Table 4 The changes of inflammatory indicators and vital signs between two surgical approaches during the perioperative period
Groups | “One-step” approach (n = 61) | “Step-up” approach (n = 97) | P value |
Indicators | |||
Preoperative inflammatory indicators | |||
White blood cells (109/L) | 11.04 ± 6.31 | 11.33 ± 6.03 | 0.77 |
Neutrophil percentage (%) | 80.86 ± 8.3 | 79.57 ± 8.9 | 0.36 |
C-reactive protein (mg/L) | 115.3 ± 81.8 | 118.5 ± 85.7 | 0.81 |
Procalcitonin (ng/mL) | 1.18 ± 1.0 | 1.08 ± 2.2 | 0.73 |
Interleukin-6 (pg/mL) | 113 ± 91.8 | 116 ± 95.1 | 0.93 |
Preoperative vital signs | |||
Body temperature (℃) | 38.5 ± 0.6 | 38.0 ± 0.8 | 0.94 |
Respiratory frequency (times/min) | 25.8 ± 4.8 | 23.1 ± 4.9 | 0.67 |
Heart rate (times/min) | 116.1 ± 14.2 | 107 ± 15.1 | 0.33 |
Inflammatory indicators on the 3rd postoperative day | |||
White blood cells (109/L) | 9.91 ± 4.5 | 10.1 ± 4.4 | 0.54 |
Neutrophil percentage (%) | 78.9 ± 6.8 | 78.1 ± 7.2 | 0.97 |
C-reactive protein (mg/L) | 91.6 ± 40.6 | 91.1 ± 53.3 | 0.92 |
Procalcitonin (ng/mL) | 0.84 ± 0.6 | 0.79 ± 0.5 | 0.71 |
Interleukin-6 (pg/mL) | 91.2 ± 60.2 | 94.7 ± 68.4 | 0.31 |
Vital signs on the 3rd postoperative day | |||
Body temperature (℃) | 38.1 ± 0.4 | 37.8 ± 0.7 | 0.49 |
Respiratory frequency (times/min) | 23.8 ± 6.1 | 22.7 ± 4.3 | 0.86 |
Heart rate (times/min) | 105.1 ± 21.9 | 100 ± 24.9 | 0.68 |
Inflammatory indicators on the 7th postoperative day | |||
White blood cells (109/L) | 7.51 ± 3.0 | 7.48 ± 2.4 | 0.96 |
Neutrophil percentage (%) | 69.30 ± 6.1 | 65.14 ± 7.8 | 0.43 |
C-reactive protein (mg/L) | 62.63 ± 25.6 | 68.05 ± 38.1 | 0.54 |
Procalcitonin (ng/mL) | 0.37 ± 0.3 | 0.31 ± 0.2 | 0.94 |
Interleukin-6 (pg/mL) | 46.3 ± 22.6 | 49.7 ± 27.4 | 0.48 |
Vital signs on the 7th postoperative day | |||
Body temperature (℃) | 37.0 ± 0.6 | 37.3 ± 0.4 | 0.95 |
Respiratory frequency (times/min) | 19.4 ± 2.3 | 19.1 ± 2.8 | 0.83 |
Heart rate (times/min) | 90.1 ± 13.7 | 85.2 ± 14.1 | 0.61 |
Table 5 The long-term complication between the two surgical approaches during the follow-up period
Groups | “One-step” approach (n = 40) | “Step-up” approach (n = 63) | P value |
Long-term complications | |||
New-onset endocrine insufficiency, n (%) | |||
Number of patients | 12 (30) | 28 (45) | 0.143 |
Oral medication | 9 (75) | 20 (71.4) | |
Insulin | 5 (41.7) | 13 (46.4) | |
Exocrine insufficiency, n (%) | |||
Fecal elastase-1, mean value | 254.1 ± 107.8 | 257.9 ± 93.3 | 0.85 |
Fecal elastase-1 < 200 μg/g, n (%) | 14 (35) | 21 (33.3) | 0.86 |
Pancreatic enzyme, n (%) | 8 (20) | 11 (20.8) | 0.93 |
Recurrent pancreatitis, n (%) | 7(17.5) | 13(20.6) | 0.69 |
Chronic pancreatitis, n (%) | 4 (10) | 7 (11.1) | 0.86 |
Incisional hernia, n (%) | 9 (20.5) | 4 (6.3) | 0.03 |
Clinical symptoms, n (%) | |||
Diarrhea | 16 (40) | 23 (36.5) | 0.72 |
Bloating | 21(52.5) | 28(44.4) | 0.43 |
Abdominal pain | 10 (25) | 13 (20.6) | 0.60 |
Weight loss | 31 (77.5) | 47 (74.6) | 0.74 |
Pancreatic pseudocyst, n (%) | 2 (5) | 5 (7.9) | 0.56 |
Pancreatic portal hypertension, n (%) | 2 (5) | 3 (4.8) | 0.96 |
Pancreatic cancer, n (%) | 0 | 0 | - |
Table 6 Quality of life rating scale during the follow-up period every 6 mo after treatment of surviving acute pancreatitis patients with the “One-step” approach or “Step-up” approach
Table 7 The comparison of perioperative medical costs between two surgical approaches
Groups | “One-step” approach (n = 61) | “Step-up” approach (n = 97) | P value |
Medical costs | |||
Surgical costs1 (RMB) | 18582.37 ± 5918.45 | 29641.63 ± 6795.11 | < 0.001 |
ICU costs (RMB) | 276812.39 ± 183417.12 | 281133.73 ± 193252.47 | 0.87 |
Perioperative medical total costs (RMB)2 | 529958.23 ± 171128.74 | 569768.07 ± 193184.68 | 0.34 |
Follow-up costs per year | |||
Outpatient costs (RMB) | 2040.79 ± 519.48 | 2169.08 ± 463.71 | 0.71 |
Auxiliary examination costs3 (RMB) | 9751.96 ± 1012.37 | 9003.65 ± 1102.29 | 0.58 |
Drug costs4 (RMB) | 2855.36 ± 318.12 | 2994.21 ± 372.95 | 0.82 |
- Citation: Zheng Z, Lu JD, Ding YX, Guo YL, Mei WT, Qu YX, Cao F, Li F. Comparison of safety, efficacy, and long-term follow-up between “one-step” and “step-up” approaches for infected pancreatic necrosis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13(11): 1372-1389
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v13/i11/1372.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1372