Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 27, 2014; 6(4): 70-73
Published online Apr 27, 2014. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v6.i4.70
Retroperitoneal paragangliomas: Report of 4 cases
Helmi Kallel, Hassen Hentati, Amine Baklouti, Ali Gassara, Ahmed Saadaoui, Ghassen Halek, Sana Landolsi, MA El Ouaer, Wajdi Chaieb, Saber Mannaï, Department of Visceral Surgery, Hospital of Jendouba, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, 2083 Ariana, Tunis
Fethia Maamouri, Department of Histopathology, Hospital of Jendouba, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, 2083 Ariana, Tunis
Author contributions: All the authors contributed to this manuscript.
Correspondence to: Dr. Kallel Helmi, Department of Visceral Surgery, Hospital of Jendouba, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Residence Omrane 6, App A8, Cité el Ghazela, 2083 Ariana, Tunis. helmi.kallel@gmail.com
Telephone: +216-98-670457 Fax: +216-70-681281
Received: July 8, 2013
Revised: October 24, 2013
Accepted: February 20, 2014
Published online: April 27, 2014
Processing time: 315 Days and 20.3 Hours

Abstract

We reviewed the data of all patients managed for retroperitoneal paragangliomas (PGLs) between June 2010 and June 2011 to present our experience concerning this uncommon entity to highlight diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of retroperitoneal PGLs. All patients were admitted to the department of general and hepatobiliary surgery in the regional hospital of Jendouba, Tunisia. The size of the tumor was taken at its largest dimension, as determined in a computed tomography (CT) scan and pathological reports. There were 4 patients (all women) with a median age of 48 years (range 46-56 years). Abdominal pain was the commonest presentation. CT showed and localized the tumors which were all retroperitoneal. All patients had successful surgical resection of the tumors under invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring. One patient underwent surgery for a presumed tumor of the pancreatic head. The fresh-mount microscopic study of the peroperative biopsy yielded inflammatory tissue without malignancy and no resection was performed. Final histological examination of the biopsy concluded PGL. A second laparotomy was performed and the tumor was entirely resected. The diagnosis was made after surgery by histology in all patients. The control of the blood pressure was improved after surgery in 3 patients. Paragangliomas are rare tumors. The retroperitoneal localization is uncommon. Complete surgical resection remains the only curative treatment but it is often challenging as these tumors are located near multiple vital blood vessels.

Key Words: Paraganglioma; Extra adrenal pheochromocytoma, Retroperitoneal; Surgery; Histology

Core tip: Retroperitoneal paragangliomas are uncommon tumors causing considerable difficulty in both diagnosis and treatment. Its complete surgical removal is often challenging as these tumors are located near multiple vital blood vessels. Any surgeon could face such a rare tumor.



INTRODUCTION

Paragangliomas (PGLs), or extra-adrenal phaeochromocytomas, are tumors arising from chromaffin tissues. Abdominal localizations are less frequent than head and neck. Retroperitoneal PGLs are more uncommon, causing considerable difficulty in diagnosis and treatment. In this article, we present our experience concerning this uncommon entity to highlight diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of retroperitoneal PGLs.

CASE REPORT

We reviewed the data of all patients managed for retroperitoneal PGLs between June 2010 and June 2011. All patients were admitted to the department of general and hepatobiliary surgery in the regional hospital of Jendouba, Tunisia. The size of the tumor was taken at its largest dimension, as determined in a computed tomography (CT) scan and pathological reports.

There were 4 patients (all women) with a median age of 48 years (range 46-56 years). The clinical features are shown in Table 1. Abdominal pain was the commonest presentation, followed by hypertension in 3 cases, headache and palpitation in 2 cases and sweating in 1 case. No abdominal mass was detected on palpation in any patient. Abdominal CT showed and localized the tumor in all patients. The tumor measured from 4 to 6 cm in diameter and showed obvious intensification after contrast material administration (Figure 1). All tumors were retroperitoneal. The diagnosis was evoked preoperatively by the CT data for the 3 first patients. Patient 4 underwent surgery for a presumed tumor of the pancreatic head. Surgical exploration revealed a soft mass of the pancreatic head without dilatation of the common bile duct. The fresh-mount microscopic study of the peroperative biopsy yielded inflammatory tissue without malignancy. No resection was performed. Final histological examination of the biopsy concluded PGL. A second laparotomy was performed. The tumor was adherent to the pancreatic parenchyma and the inferior vena cava. It was carefully dissected and entirely resected. Final histological examination of the specimen confirmed the diagnosis of PGL. All patients had successful surgical resection of the tumors under invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring. Complete surgical removal was difficult because the tumors were located near multiple vital blood vessels: celiac region for patient 1 (Figure 2A), right para aortic for patient 2, retrocaval for patient 3 (Figure 2B) and near the pancreatic head for patient 4. There was no evidence of malignancy, as judged by local infiltration or the presence of metastasis. The diagnosis was made after surgery by histology in all cases because of the unavailability of measurements of urinary and plasma adrenaline, noradrenaline and metanephrine concentrations in our hospital. Histology revealed a tumor composed of spindle to polygonal cells with abundant basophilic granular cytoplasm and moderate pleomorphism. The cell architecture was trabecular and nested, pathognomonic of paraganglioma (Figure 3). Low mitotic activity was observed and there was no capsular invasion. The tumor was encapsulated and demarcated from the surrounding effaced pancreatic parenchyma in patient 4. Tumor cells stained positively for synaptophysin, chromogranin and S100 in all cases (Figure 4). The morphological and immunohistochemical profile was consistent with extra-adrenal PGL. The control of the blood pressure was improved after surgery in 3 patients.

Table 1 Clinical features of the patients with paragangliomas.
PatientAge (yr)/sexAbdominal painHypertensionPalpitationHeadacheSweatingLocationSize (cm)
154/FYNYNYCeliac region6
246/FYYNYNRight para-aortic4
356/FYYYNNRetrocaval Near right adrenal5
448/FYYNYNNear pancreatic head5
Figure 1
Figure 1 Abdominal computed tomography without (A) and after (B) contrast material administration, showing the tumor (arrowhead) with calcifications (white arrowhead) and precocious enhancement. Note the close tumoral relationship to the celiac trunk (black arrow) and hepatic artery (black arrowhead).
Figure 2
Figure 2 Operative view. A: Patient 1. A1: Separation of the tumor (T) from the anterior aspect of the inferior vena cava (IVC); A2: Surgical site after tumor resection (arrowhead); B: Patient 3. B1: Separation of the tumor (T) from the posterior wall of the IVC; B2: Surgical site after tumor resection (arrowhead). LRV: Left renal vein; D: Duodenum; HP: Head of the pancreas; PL: Liver pedicle; RRV: Right renal vein; RK: Right kidney; HA: Hepatic artery; LP: Liver pedicle; L: Liver (Lobe of Spiegel).
Figure 3
Figure 3 Microscopic view of paraganglioma. Large polygonal cells with granular cytoplasm arranged in nests (hematoxylin and eosin).
Figure 4
Figure 4 Immunohistochemistry. Tumoral cells strongly express anti-chromogranin antibody.
DISCUSSION

Retroperitoneal PGL is a rare pathological entity that occurs most often in young adults[1]. PGLs are often unique; multiple tumors are observed in only 10% of the cases. Signs and symptoms are variable and frequently paroxysmal due to the variable and disorderly release of catecholamines by the tumor. The typical presentation is a combination of variable hypertension with paroxysmal symptoms, either occurring spontaneously or provoked by high abdominal pressure during anteflexion, urination or defecation[2]. The diagnosis of catecholamine-secreting tumors should be based on the determination of plasma or urinary metanephrine concentration[2]. Preoperative imaging tests are used to locate the tumor, to determine whether it is single or multiple, adrenal or ectopic, benign or malignant and isolated or present with other neoplasms in the context of familial syndromes. Magnetic resonance imaging is similar to CT in the diagnosis of PG, but it is preferred in children and pregnant women[2]. Some authors propose 123I-MIBG scintigraphy to diagnose secreting PGLs, with a sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 99% respectively[1]. Complete surgical removal provides a 5 year survival of 75%. It is then considered as the only curative treatment of PGLs[1] but it is often challenging as these highly vascular tumors are located near multiple vital blood vessels. Preoperative pharmacological preparation is necessary. It has an important role in achieving the safest and most successful outcome[3]. Given the hypervascular aspect of the tumor, some authors propose pre-operative embolization. Laparoscopic resection of PGL has been reported in the literature, with all the known advantages of the mini-invasive surgery. In our patients, we performed open surgery because of the localization of the tumor in contact with important vessels. PGLs also have potential to be malignant. It has been reported in the literature that around 20% of PGLs could be malignant with poor survival[4]. While histopathological findings are not very useful to differentiate between benign and malignant PGLs, extensive local invasion and distant metastasis have been used as indicators for malignancy[5-7]. Recurrences and malignancy are more frequent in cases with large or extra-adrenal tumors. Patients should be followed up indefinitely, particularly if they have inherited or extra-adrenal tumors.

In conclusion, paragangliomas are rare tumors with a limited number of cases reported. The localization in the retroperitoneal region is uncommon and is a challenge for surgical resection. Complete surgical resection remains the only curative treatment. Lifetime follow-up is necessary to detect recurrences.

COMMENTS
Case characteristics

There were 4 patients (all women) with a median age of 48 years (range 46-56 years). Abdominal pain was the commonest presentation. Computed tomography showed and localized the tumors which were all retroperitoneal.

Clinical diagnosis

One patient underwent surgery for a presumed tumor of the pancreatic head. The fresh-mount microscopic study of a preoperative biopsy yielded inflammatory tissue without malignancy and no resection was performed. Final histological examination of the biopsy concluded paragangliomas. A second laparotomy was performed and the tumor was entirely resected.

Differential diagnosis

The diagnosis was made after surgery by histology in all patients.

Experiences and lessons

The retroperitoneal localization is uncommon. Complete surgical resection remains the only curative treatment but it is often challenging as these tumors are located near multiple vital blood vessels.

Peer review

The authors report on a relatively uncommon condition. It would be worth detailing the histopathology and defining how this differs from other retroperitoneal neoplastic lesions.

Footnotes

P- Reviewers: Bassotti G, Freeman HJ S- Editor: Gou SX L- Editor: Roemmele A E- Editor: Wu HL

References
1.  Puche P, Jacquet E, Colombo PE, Jaber S, Alric P, Carabalona JP, Bouyabrine H, Domergue J, Navarro F. Surgical management of a preaortic paraganglioma: Report of one case. Ann Chir. 2006;131:559-563.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Plouin PF, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP. Initial work-up and long-term follow-up in patients with phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;20:421-434.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Niemann U, Hiller W, Behrend M. 25 years experience of the surgical treatment of phaeochromocytoma. Eur J Surg. 2002;168:716-719.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Andersen KF, Altaf R, Krarup-Hansen A, Kromann-Andersen B, Horn T, Christensen NJ, Hendel HW. Malignant pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas - the importance of a multidisciplinary approach. Cancer Treat Rev. 2011;37:111-119.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 64]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 65]  [Article Influence: 4.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Arrabal-Polo MA, Arrabal-Martin M, Lopez-Leon VM, Abad-Menor F, Valle-Diaz de la Guardia F, Mijan-Ortiz JL, Zuluaga-Gomez A. Spontaneous retroperitoneal abscess as the first clinical manifestation of a non-functioning retroperitoneal paraganglioma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92:W17-W19.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Sangster G, Do D, Previgliano C, Li B, LaFrance D, Heldmann M. Primary retroperitoneal paraganglioma simulating a pancreatic mass: a case report and review of the literature. HPB Surg. 2010;2010:645728.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Moslemi MK, Abolhasani M, Vafaeimanesh J. Malignant abdominal paraganglioma presenting as a giant intra-peritoneal mass. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2012;3:537-540.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]