Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2012; 4(8): 203-207
Published online Aug 27, 2012. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v4.i8.203
Stenotic ischemic colitis treated with laparoscopy-assisted surgery
Tomoya Tsukada, Tatsuo Nakano, Daisuke Matsui, Shozo Sasaki, Department of Surgery, Asanogawa General Hospital, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8621, Japan
Tomoya Tsukada, Daisuke Matsui, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Division of Cancer Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8641, Japan
Author contributions: Tsukada T contributed to the treatment of the patient, collected details of the case, reviewed the literature, and drafted the manuscript; Nakano T contributed to the treatment of the patient and helped in the drafting of the manuscript; Matsui D and Sasaki S also contributed to the treatment of the patients; all authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Correspondence to: Tomoya Tsukada, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterologic Surgery, Division of Cancer Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8641, Japan. tkd_tmy@nifty.com
Telephone: +81-76-2652362 Fax: +81-76-2344260
Received: October 15, 2011
Revised: July 19, 2012
Accepted: August 2, 2012
Published online: August 27, 2012

Abstract

Ischemic colitis is the most common type of intestinal ischemia. The etiology of this condition is multifactorial, and the diagnosis is based on a combination of clinical symptoms, as well as endoscopic and histological findings. Although conservative therapy is effective in most cases, surgery still plays a key role in the treatment of ischemic colitis. Here, we describe a case of a 73-year-old man in whom laparoscopy-assisted left colectomy was performed 80 d after the onset of ischemic colitis. He recovered completely after surgery, and the pathological findings were consistent with ischemic colitis. To the best of our knowledge, there are no detailed reports of laparoscopic surgery for chronic segmental stenotic ischemic colitis. We discussed the usefulness of laparoscopic surgery, comparing it with endoscopic treatment, and we propose an optimal treatment strategy from a viewpoint of stenosis length and duration of disease.

Key Words: Ischemic colitis; Laparoscopic surgery; Stenosis; Chronic; Endoscopy



INTRODUCTION

Ischemic colitis (IC) is the most common type of intestinal ischemia, and it is more prevalent in the elderly. Boley et al[1] first reported 5 cases of IC, and defined reversible microvascular occlusion of the colon without apparent blockage of main artery[1,2]. Marston et al[2] classified IC into 3 types: transient, strictures, and gangrene. Currently, colonic ischemia is categorized, according to its severity and clinical presentation, as follows: reversible colonopathy, transient colitis, chronic colitis, stricture, gangrene, and fulminant universal colitis[3]. In most cases of IC, conservative therapy is effective, which includes the following vital components: intravenous fluid administration, hemodynamic stabilization, discontinuation or avoidance of vasoconstrictive agents, bowel rest, and empiric antibiotics[3]. Stamatakos et al[4] reported that approximately one-third of patients with colonic ischemia subsequently develop chronic segmental colitis and strictures. In the acute phase, exploratory laparotomy may be needed in patients with peritoneal irritation signs, massive bleeding, and fulminant IC. In these cases, right hemicolectomy and primary anastomosis is performed in right-sided IC, whereas left-sided IC is managed with a proximal stoma and mucous fistula. However, patients with a chronic stricture have enough time to prepare for surgery, and thus, they may benefit from less invasive surgery and avoidance of stoma, leading to improved quality of life.

Here, we report the case of a patient with IC, in whom we performed laparoscopy-assisted left colectomy and primary anastomosis for the long strictured segment of the colon, and we have also provided a mini-review of the literature.

CASE REPORT

A 73-year-old male patient suffering from diabetes mellitus for 10 years presented with sudden lower abdominal pain and was subsequently referred to our hospital. When he was brought to our hospital, he had begun to have a gross hematochezia. The abdomen was flat and soft with mild tenderness in the lower abdomen, but no peritoneal irritation signs. There were no findings suggestive of inflammatory bowel disease such as aphthae in the mouth and anal fistula. Blood test results suggested that he had anemia (hemoglobin level, 13.2 g/dL) and mild inflammation (white blood cell count and C-reactive protein level: 13 000/μL and 1.2 mg/dL, respectively). The serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 were within the normal range (1.8 ng/mL and 18 U/mL, respectively). On analysis of the fecal culture, amoeba and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli were not observed. Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed mucosal omission in the entire circumference of the colonic wall with slight oozing of blood (Figure 1A). Deeper insertion of the endoscope was considered hazardous.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Endoscopic findings. A: Initial endoscopic findings, with entire mucosal deficiency and oozing at 20 cm from the anal verge; B: Strictured colon wall after conservative treatment.

We diagnosed IC on the basis of these findings and administered conservative treatment, including intravenous fluid administration, bowel rest, and empiric antibiotics. Hematochezia was relieved promptly, although follow-up endoscopy still showed inflammation (Figure 1B). Neoplastic lesions were not admitted, and pathological analysis of the biopsy specimen showed inflammatory cell infiltration. However, circumferential stenosis and constipation symptoms had appeared. Defecation was frequent, and diarrhea was persistent. Symptomatic improvement was not observed during outpatient observation.

Almost 60 d after the first visit, we evaluated the degree of stenosis. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen revealed a strictured descending colon wall (Figure 2A), and the length of the stricture was over 15 cm. The inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) was not obstructed, but slightly narrowed at the origin (Figure 2B). Radiographic contrast study of the lower gastrointestinal tract also showed a strictured descending colon (Figure 3). Eighty days after the first visit, surgical treatment was suggested, because conservative treatment did not bring about improvement in the patients’ condition.

Figure 2
Figure 2 Computed tomography and 3D reconstituted imaging. A: Computed tomography shows the strictured descending colon wall (arrow); B: Strictured colon for a length of 15 cm (arrows).
Figure 3
Figure 3 Radiographic contrast study of the lower gastrointestinal tract.

Laparoscopy-assisted left colectomy was performed for the patient. The descending colon was stiffly scarred, and the omentum was firmly adhered. However, soft tissue at the origin of the IMA was normal; thus, an internal approach from the retroperitoneum was considered safe. After mobilization of the colon under laparoscopy, a 5-cm transumbilical incision was placed for interruption of the marginal artery and the intestine. Subsequently, functional end-to-end anastomosis was performed. A colostomy was not created. The surgery lasted for 4 h 10 min; 110 mL of blood was lost during the surgery. An examination of the gross features of the resected specimen revealed that the intestinal wall was thickened, and that the length of the stenosis was 15 cm (Figure 4A). Histopathologically, significant fibrosis and inflammatory cell infiltration were observed in the submucosa (Figure 4B). These findings were consistent with those of IC.

Figure 4
Figure 4 Laparoscopy-assisted left colectomy. A: Macroscopic appearance of the resected specimen; B: Histopathological findings of the strictured colon (HE, staining × 40).

The patient was discharged on postoperative day 9, without any postoperative complications. He is alive at more than 12 mo and is being followed-up closely.

DISCUSSION

The etiology of IC is multifactorial, and its diagnosis is based on a combination of clinical suspicion, and endoscopic and histological findings[5]. Even though treatment depends on the severity of the disease, conservative therapy is effective in most cases of IC. However, there are patients who need surgical treatment. Approximately 20% of patients with acute IC require surgery[6]. In general, surgery is indicated in patients with chronic stenotic colitis, gangrene colitis, and fulminant universal colitis. A recent study also reported that clinical patterns of IC included reversible colopathy (26.1%), transient colitis (43.7%), gangrenous colitis (9.9%), fulminant pancolitis (2.5%), and chronic segmental colitis (17.9%)[7]. In the disease group requiring surgery, especially in the chronic stenotic colitis group, endoscopic treatment and minimally invasive surgery have been attempted.

Laparoscopic surgery is a typical method of minimally invasive surgery; however, coherent investigations of laparoscopic surgery for IC have not yet been reported. Furthermore, ischemic lesions are rare in the small intestine because of rich collateral circulation. Hence, we reviewed and summarized 6 cases (including ours) of laparoscopic surgery for ischemic enterocolitis (Table 1)[8-12].

Table 1 Reported cases of laparoscopic surgery for ischemic enterocolitis.
Case No.Age (yr)GenderSite of stenosisLength of stenosis (cm)Duration until operation (d)ProcedureStomaOperation time (min)Amount of bleeding (mL)ComplicationsPostoperative hospital stay (d)
168FemaleSplenic flexure1563Left colectomy-260100-15
276FemaleAscending530Right colectomy-21081-9
360MaleJejunum6100Partial resection-180ND-14
451MaleJejunum328Partial resection-NDND-13
566MaleJejunum468Partial resection-NDND-14
Our case73MaleDescending1580Left colectomy-240110-9

There exist no strict criteria for the surgical treatment of chronic IC. Brandt et al[13] reported that a patient with severe IC would typically recover in 1-6 mo. Even if the stenosis exists, effect of bougie by the own fecal or gas which transit digestive tract might relieve the stenosis. However, in the case that clinical symptoms interfere with activities of daily living, surgical treatment should be considered. The median duration until surgery was found to be 65.5 d (range: 28-100 d) (Table 1); in general, prolonged clinical symptoms over 2 mo should be considered as an indication of surgical treatment. Conversely, transendoscopic dilation or stenting has the potential to be an alternative to surgery, and several such studies have been reported[14,15]. When deciding between surgical treatment and endoscopic therapy, length of stenosis is one of the important factors. Solt et al[16] have reported that the median stenotic length was 1.5 cm (range: 1-5 cm) in 57 cases of balloon dilation for benign disease. Keränen et al[17] summarized the previous report and reported that the median stenotic length was 4.5 cm in patients who were treated with self-expanding metallic stents (SEMSs). The longest stenosis successfully treated by SEMS was 8 cm[15]. Thus, it is believed that endoscopic treatment is technically possible for straight colonic strictures; however, cases of longer stenosis or flexure location are considered difficult. In laparoscopically treated IC patients, the length of the stenosis was 15 cm in 2 patients. One patient showed a 5-cm long stenosis, but the location was right-sided (Table 1). Surgical treatment is considered to be more useful when the site of stenosis is the right-sided colon or hepatic and splenic flexure, when the stenosis is over 10-cm long.

Thus far, no study has focused on surgical treatment in chronic stenosis. Surgical intervention for IC has been applied to relatively severe cases, and a high mortality rate of 10%-48% has been reported[18-22]. Scharff et al[19] reported that the mortality rate of surgery was 17.6% (3/17) even after conservative treatment. In addition, the primary anastomosis rate was 33%-72.5%[18,21,22], and in many cases of surgery, the stoma had been forced. The following rates of complications in endoscopic treatment have been reported: 0% (0/57)[16], 18.7% (10/21)[17], 15.0% (8/21)[23], 28% (7/25)[24], and thus, endoscopic treatment is considered acceptable and useful as a bridging treatment before surgery. Furthermore, colostomy can be avoided with endoscopic stenting, but endoscopic stenting is temporary and should only be a bridge to surgery[23]. Among the reported cases of laparoscopic surgery, the mean operative time was 222 min, the mean postoperative hospital stay was 12.3 d, and there were no cases of surgical complications or colostomy. Even though a comparison is not appropriate because of the differences in patient backgrounds, in conventional open surgery, the mean operative time ranged from 135 to 165 min[18,21], and the postoperative hospital stay was 12-13 d[18,22]. Laparoscopic surgery tends to be associated with a long operating time; however, it is considered a safe and feasible option in cases where the clinical symptoms persist even after conservative therapy and in cases of stenosis exceeding 10 cm in length. In the near future, even in the acute phase, it is expected that colostomy can be avoided by a combination therapy of decompression by endoscopic treatment and laparoscopic surgery, thus producing a favorable effect on the quality of life.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Mr. Keigo Komai for providing pathological technical assistance and Dr. Hiroto Nishida for providing assistance with diagnostic imaging analysis.

Footnotes

Peer reviewer: Zenichi Morise, MD, PhD, Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo Kutsukakecho, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan

S- Editor Song XX L- Editor A E- Editor Xiong L

References
1.  Boley SJ, Schwartz S, Lash J, Sternhill V. Reversible vascular occlusion of the colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1963;116:53-60.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Marston A, Pheils MT, Thomas ML, Morson BC. Ischaemic colitis. Gut. 1966;7:1-15.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 353]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 377]  [Article Influence: 6.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Brandt LJ, Boley SJ. AGA technical review on intestinal ischemia. American Gastrointestinal Association. Gastroenterology. 2000;118:954-968.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 419]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 327]  [Article Influence: 13.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Stamatakos M, Douzinas E, Stefanaki C, Petropoulou C, Arampatzi H, Safioleas C, Giannopoulos G, Chatziconstantinou C, Xiromeritis C, Safioleas M. Ischemic colitis: surging waves of update. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2009;218:83-92.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Theodoropoulou A, Koutroubakis IE. Ischemic colitis: clinical practice in diagnosis and treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:7302-7308.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 159]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 151]  [Article Influence: 9.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
6.  Longo WE, Ballantyne GH, Gusberg RJ. Ischemic colitis: patterns and prognosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35:726-730.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 136]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 138]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Montoro MA, Brandt LJ, Santolaria S, Gomollon F, Sánchez Puértolas B, Vera J, Bujanda L, Cosme A, Cabriada JL, Durán M. Clinical patterns and outcomes of ischaemic colitis: results of the Working Group for the Study of Ischaemic Colitis in Spain (CIE study). Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:236-246.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 101]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 107]  [Article Influence: 8.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Koneri K, Iida A, Goi T, Katayama K, Hirose K, Yamaguchi A. A case of strictural form ischemic colitis treated by laparoscopically assisted colectomy. Geka. 2004;66:1338-1342.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Furumoto K, Mizuno R, Mori T, Motohiro T, Kogire M. A case of stenosis of ischemic ascending colon with portal venous gas treated with laparoscopy-assisted surgery. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2007;68:2004-2008.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Miyake K, Tanaka S, Hashimoto T, Miyake S. Laparoscopically assisted surgery for an ischemic stricture of the small intestine. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 1997;58:2562-2565.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Shiraishi K, Isobe K, Mori S, Nakayama T, Nishiumi T, Furuta Y. A case of posttraumatic ischemic stenosis of the small bowel: usefulness of laparoscopy-assisted surgery. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2002;63:2458-2462.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Higashi Y, Nakamura T, Hayashi T, Uno A, Konno H, Nakamura S. A case of ischemic stenosis of the small bowel treated with laparoscopy-assisted surgery. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2004;65:1277-1280.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Brandt LJ, Boley SJ. Colonic ischemia. Surg Clin North Am. 1992;72:203-229.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Oz MC, Forde KA. Endoscopic alternatives in the management of colonic strictures. Surgery. 1990;108:513-519.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Zeitoun JD, Van Nhieu JT, Brunetti F, Luciani A, Karoui M, Delchier JC, Charachon A. Self-expanding metallic stent for ischemic colonic obstruction. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2372-2373.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Solt J, Hertelendy A, Szilágyi K. Long-term results of balloon catheter dilation of lower gastrointestinal tract stenoses. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1499-1505.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Keränen I, Lepistö A, Udd M, Halttunen J, Kylänpää L. Outcome of patients after endoluminal stent placement for benign colorectal obstruction. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:725-731.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 72]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 76]  [Article Influence: 5.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Beck DE, de Aguilar-Nascimento JE. Surgical management and outcome in acute ischemic colitis. Ochsner J. 2011;11:282-285.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Scharff JR, Longo WE, Vartanian SM, Jacobs DL, Bahadursingh AN, Kaminski DL. Ischemic colitis: spectrum of disease and outcome. Surgery. 2003;134:624-69; discussion 624-69;.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 100]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 106]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Jin NC, Kim HS, Kim DH, Song YA, Kim YJ, Seo TJ, Park SY, Park CH, Joo YE, Choi SK. A Comparison of clinical characteristics between medically-treated patients and surgically-treated patients with ischemic colitis. Clin Endosc. 2011;44:38-43.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Reissfelder C, Sweiti H, Antolovic D, Rahbari NN, Hofer S, Büchler MW, Weitz J, Koch M. Ischemic colitis: who will survive? Surgery. 2011;149:585-592.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Ng KC, Law WL, Lee YM, Choi HK, Seto CL, Ho JW. Self-expanding metallic stent as a bridge to surgery versus emergency resection for obstructing left-sided colorectal cancer: a case-matched study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:798-803.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 90]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 92]  [Article Influence: 5.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Small AJ, Young-Fadok TM, Baron TH. Expandable metal stent placement for benign colorectal obstruction: outcomes for 23 cases. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:454-462.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 115]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 92]  [Article Influence: 5.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Brehant O, Fuks D, Bartoli E, Yzet T, Verhaeghe P, Regimbeau JM. Elective (planned) colectomy in patients with colorectal obstruction after placement of a self-expanding metallic stent as a bridge to surgery: the results of a prospective study. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:178-183.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 46]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]