Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2025; 17(2): 99510
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.99510
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.99510
Figure 1 Comparison of the direct treatment cost and cost-efficiency between the two groups following propensity score matching.
A: Direct cost fee; B: Cost-efficiency. aP < 0.05. EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection; CSP: Cold snare polypectomy.
Figure 2
Forest plot of the multivariate analysis of recurrence after endoscopic polypectomy.
- Citation: Zhang SY, Wang YC, Liu LL, Wang ZH, Guan XM. Efficacy-cost analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection and cold snare polypectomy: A propensity score matching analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(2): 99510
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i2/99510.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.99510