Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 27, 2024; 16(4): 1087-1096
Published online Apr 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i4.1087
Figure 1
Figure 1 Experimental flow chart. ALF: Acute liver failure.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Comparison of the differences between the acute liver failure group and non-acute liver failure group. A: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; B: Albumin-bilirubin score. aP < 0.05. ALF: Acute liver failure.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Receiver operating characteristic curves of predicting the occurrence of acute liver failure after R0 surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma. A: Acute liver failure; B: Blood loss volume; C: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; D: Albumin-bilirubin score. AFP: Acute liver failure; BLV: Blood loss volume; NLR: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; ALBI: Albumin-bilirubin score; AUC: Area under the curve.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Nomogram prediction model for the occurrence of acute liver failure after R0 surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma. AFP: Acute liver failure; BLV: Blood loss volume; NLR: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; ALBI: Albumin-bilirubin score.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Evaluation of the nomogram prediction model. A: Receiver operating characteristic curve; B: Calibration curve; C: Decision curve analysis. AUC: Area under the curve.