Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2024; 16(2): 529-538
Published online Feb 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.529
Figure 1
Figure 1 Rectal compliance was assessed by five-line partition scoring. A: The shape of the wall of the intestine in the area where the bowel was at rest; B: Continuous contraction and relaxation of the intestinal wall in the area where the contrast agent passes through the intestine.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Utilization of magnetic resonance imaging scanning for the acquisition of dynamic and static rectal images. A: Rectum condition in preparation for defecation; B: Rectum deformation at the beginning of defecation; C: Rectum deformation during defecation; D: Rectum deformation after defecation: E: Rectum deformation at the end of defecation; F: Rectum returns to initial state after defecation (contrast agent downward filling in upper segment).
Figure 3
Figure 3 Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score. LARS: Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Relationship between postoperative Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score and magnetic resonance imaging-rectal compliance score. LARS: Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Relationship between postoperative Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score and defecation rate. LARS: Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score.