Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2024; 16(2): 529-538
Published online Feb 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.529
Published online Feb 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.529
Figure 1 Rectal compliance was assessed by five-line partition scoring.
A: The shape of the wall of the intestine in the area where the bowel was at rest; B: Continuous contraction and relaxation of the intestinal wall in the area where the contrast agent passes through the intestine.
Figure 2 Utilization of magnetic resonance imaging scanning for the acquisition of dynamic and static rectal images.
A: Rectum condition in preparation for defecation; B: Rectum deformation at the beginning of defecation; C: Rectum deformation during defecation; D: Rectum deformation after defecation: E: Rectum deformation at the end of defecation; F: Rectum returns to initial state after defecation (contrast agent downward filling in upper segment).
Figure 3 Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score.
LARS: Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score.
Figure 4 Relationship between postoperative Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score and magnetic resonance imaging-rectal compliance score.
LARS: Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 5 Relationship between postoperative Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score and defecation rate.
LARS: Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score.
- Citation: Meng LH, Mo XW, Yang BY, Qin HQ, Song QZ, He XX, Li Q, Wang Z, Mo CL, Yang GH. To explore the pathogenesis of anterior resection syndrome by magnetic resonance imaging rectal defecography. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(2): 529-538
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i2/529.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.529