Okoduwa SIR, Umar IA, James DB, Inuwa HM, Habila JD. Evaluation of extraction protocols for anti-diabetic phytochemical substances from medicinal plants. World J Diabetes 2016; 7(20): 605-614 [PMID: 28031778 DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v7.i20.605]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Stanley Irobekhian Reuben Okoduwa, Researcher, Directorate of Research and Development, Nigerian Institute of Leather and Science Technology, P.M.B. 1034, Zaria 810004, Nigeria. siroplc@gmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Biochemical Research Methods
Article-Type of This Article
Basic Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Diabetes. Dec 15, 2016; 7(20): 605-614 Published online Dec 15, 2016. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v7.i20.605
Table 1 Comparison of percentage recovery yield, extraction time and volume of solvent used for the different extraction methods for the two plants
Vernonia amygdalina
Ocimum gratissimum
Parameter
MAE
Soxhlet
Maceration
MAE
Soxhlet
Maceration
Sample (g)
50
50
50
50
50
50
Solvent volume (mL)
250
500
900
250
500
900
Extraction time (min)
39
265
4320
39
255
4320
Recovery yield (g)
10.45 ± 0.53b
7.88 ± 0.35a
7.18 ± 0.14a
9.55 ± 0.84b
5.63 ± 0.21a
5.08 ± 0.32a
Percentage recovered (%)
20.90 ± 1.05b
15.75 ± 0.71a
14.35 ± 0.28a
19.10 ± 1.67b
11.25 ± 0.24a
10.15 ± 0.65a
Table 2 Calculated percentage differences in recovery yield of extracts between the extraction methods
Vernonia amygdalina
Ocimum gratissimum
MAE
Soxhlet
Maceration
MAE
41.05%
46.81%
Soxhlet
24.59%
9.77%
Maceration
31.29%
8.88%
Table 3 Comparison of some qualitative phytochemicals obtained with the three extraction methods for the two plants
S/N
Constituents
Maceration
Soxhlet
Microwave
VA
OG
VA
OG
VA
OG
1
Carbohydrates
+
+
+
+
+
+
2
Anthraquinones
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
Glycosides
+
+
+
+
+
+
4
Cardiac glycosides
+
+
+
+
+
+
5
Saponins
+
+
+
+
+
+
6
Steroids
+
+
+
+
+
+
7
Triterpenes
+
+
+
+
+
+
8
Tannins
+
+
+
+
+
+
9
Flavonoids
+
+
+
+
+
+
10
Alkaloid
+
+
+
+
+
+
Table 4 Comparison of the quantitative phytochemicals obtained with the three extraction methods for the two plants
Vernonia amygdalina (mg/100 g)
Ocimum gratissimum (mg/100 g)
MAE
Soxhlet
Maceration
MAE
Soxhlet
Maceration
Alkaloid
4.0 ± 0.65a
7.0 ± 0.57b
5.0 ± 0.46a
6.5 ± 0.75b
7.0 ± 0.15b
5.0 ± 0.90a
Flavonoid
13.0 ± 0.35b
9.0 ± 0.50a
15.0 ± 0.21c
10.0 ± 0.35b
8.0 ± 0.18a
12.0 ± 0.25c
Phenolic
17.5 ± 0.25c
15.0 ± 0.21b
12.0 ± 0.70a
15.0 ± 0.22c
14.0 ± 0.21b
11.0 ± 0.65a
Saponin
4.5 ± 0.45b
3.0 ± 0.30a
2.0 ± 0.75a
6.1 ± 0.75b
4.0 ± 0.92a
5.0 ± 0.20a
Tannin
14.0 ± 0.55b
13.0 ± 0.50b
10.0 ± 0.25a
12.0 ± 0.18b
9.0 ± 0.24a
9.1 ± 0.25a
Table 5 Effect of the extract from the different extraction methods on blood glucose in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats
Group
Before induction
7 d after induction
Days after treatment
7th
14th
21st
CME
79.4 ± 4.5
344.6 ± 10.3
282.8 ± 17.6
195.8 ± 18.3
106.5 ± 6.7
SEE
85.3 ± 3.2
396.8 ± 15.7
342.5 ± 14.7
264.9 ± 16.8
121.1 ± 10.2
MAE
82.7 ± 5.1
373.3 ± 13.6
331.3 ± 11.4
237.1 ± 8.9
102.4 ± 7.6
PC
91.6 ± 4.5
389.4 ± 11.9
359.0 ± 12.6
266.3 ± 13.2
97.3 ± 5.8
NC
80.6 ± 3.8
365.5 ± 9.8
395.1 ± 16.3
419.6 ± 10.2
448.4 ± 17.4
HC
83.2 ± 6.2
84.8 ± 4.7
83.9 ± 7.8
84.7 ± 6.5
84.2 ± 7.1
Table 6 Calculated percentage change in blood glucose after treatment with the extracts in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats
Group
Initial blood glucose on day 0 (mg/dL)
Percentage change after treatment (%)
Day 7
Day 14
Day 21
CME
344.6 ± 10.3
18.0 ± 2.66e
43.3 ± 3.62e
69.1 ± 1.03c
SEE
396.8 ± 15.7
13.7 ± 0.29d
33.3 ± 1.60c,d
69.5 ± 0.71c
MAE
373.3 ± 13.6
11.2 ± 0.18c,d
36.5 ± 0.08d
72.6 ± 1.03d
PC
389.4 ± 11.9
7.8 ± 0.42c
31.6 ± 1.30c
75.0 ± 0.73d
NC
365.5 ± 9.8
-8.1 ± 1.57a
-14.8 ± 0.29a
-22.7 ± 1.47a
HC
84.8 ± 4.7
1.4 ± 3.96b
0.1 ± 2.12b
0.7 ± 2.88b
Citation: Okoduwa SIR, Umar IA, James DB, Inuwa HM, Habila JD. Evaluation of extraction protocols for anti-diabetic phytochemical substances from medicinal plants. World J Diabetes 2016; 7(20): 605-614