Lam T, Burns K, Dennis M, Cheung NW, Gunton JE. Assessment of cardiovascular risk in diabetes: Risk scores and provocative testing. World J Diabetes 2015; 6(4): 634-641 [PMID: 25987961 DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i4.634]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Jenny E Gunton, Professor, Faculty of Medicine, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Room 2040, Clinical Sciences Corridor, Sydney NSW 2145, Australia. j.gunton@garvan.org.au
Research Domain of This Article
Endocrinology & Metabolism
Article-Type of This Article
Minireviews
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 5 Sensitivity and specificity of provocative testing in women[44]
Diagnostic test
Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
Exercise electrocardiogram
31-71
66-78
Exercise echocardiogram
80-88
79-86
Pharmacological echocardiogram
76-90
85-94
Nuclear perfusion study
78-88
64-91
Computed tomography coronary angiogram
97
79
Citation: Lam T, Burns K, Dennis M, Cheung NW, Gunton JE. Assessment of cardiovascular risk in diabetes: Risk scores and provocative testing. World J Diabetes 2015; 6(4): 634-641