Bertoli S, Laureati M, Battezzati A, Bergamaschi V, Cereda E, Spadafranca A, Vignati L, Pagliarini E. Taste sensitivity, nutritional status and metabolic syndrome: Implication in weight loss dietary interventions. World J Diabetes 2014; 5(5): 717-723 [PMID: 25317249 DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v5.i5.717]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Simona Bertoli, MD, PhD, International Center for the Assessment of Nutritional Status, Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, University of Milan, Via Botticelli 21, 20133 Milan, Italy. simona.bertoli@unimi.it
Research Domain of This Article
Nutrition & Dietetics
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 4 Taste sensitivity in overweight and obese patients according to metabolic syndrome and gender
Overall
Women
Men
MetS+ (n = 33)
MetS- (n = 60)
P1
MetS+ (n = 21)
MetS- (n = 45)
P1
MetS+ (n = 12)
MetS- (n = 15)
P1
BMI (kg/m2)
33.7 ± 5.2
30.7 ± 4.2
0.002
33.5 ± 4.8
30.0 ± 3.9
0.002
34.1 ± 6.1
32.7 ± 4.4
0.485
BF%
47.7 ± 6.0
46.4 ± 4.7
0.281
50.3 ± 4.4
47.2 ± 4.5
0.013
43.1 ± 5.8
43.8 ± 4.2
0.744
Waist (cm)
106.2 ± 14.2
96.1 ± 16.3
0.004
101.9 ± 11.2
94.1 ± 9.4
0.005
113.9 ± 16.0
102.2 ± 28.0
0.288
Sweet (log g/L)
0.87 ± 0.41
0.80 ± 0.47
0.396
0.81 ± 0.45
0.72 ± 0.43
0.458
0.97 ± 0.31
1.02 ± 0.51
0.730
Salty (log g/L)
0.43 ± 0.56
0.16 ± 0.52
0.029
0.31 ± 0.50
0.10 ± 0.45
0.121
0.65 ± 0.62
0.33 ± 0.67
0.244
Sour (log g/L)
-0.01 ± 0.69
-0.27 ± 0.49
0.069
-0.08 ± 0.59
-0.39 ± 0.39
0.022
0.11 ± 0.85
0.08 ± 0.61
0.859
Bitter (log g/L)
-0.22 ± 0.28
-0.23 ± 0.31
0.956
-0.24 ± 0.27
-0.23 ± 0.29
0.846
-0.18 ± 0.30
-0.23 ± 0.37
0.757
GTAS
7.4 ± 2.0
7.7 ± 1.9
0.440
7.8 ± 2.0
7.8 ± 1.7
0.936
6.8 ± 1.9
7.5 ± 2.4
0.414
Table 5 Features of overweight and obese patients according to the outcome
Drop-out
Continuing the program
Overall
WL < 5%
WL≥5%
(n = 29)
(n = 64)
(n = 27)
(n = 37)
Sex (M:F)
8:21
19:45
6:21
13:24
Age (yr)
45.3 ± 11.4
46.7 ± 11.7
48.1 ± 12.1
45.7 ± 11.4
Current smoking (n)
15 (51.7)
40 (62.4)
14 (51.6)
26 (70.2)
Menopause (n)
9 (42.9)
22 (48.9)
11 (52.4)
11 (45.8)
BMI (kg/m2)
31.0 ± 4.3
32.1 ± 5.0
32.8 ± 4.8
31.6 ± 5.2
Body fat mass (%)
46.6 ± 4.9
46.9 ± 5.3
47.8 ± 5.3
46.3 ± 5.4
Waist (cm)
99.3 ± 13.2
99.9 ± 17.5
112.7 ± 12.3
99.7 ± 20.5
Metabolic syndrome (n)
10 (34.5)
23 (35.9)
10 (37.0)
13 (35.1)
Weight loss (%)
-
-5.6 ± 3.5
-2.5 ± 1.7
-7.8 ± 2.5
Taste thresholds
Sweet (log g/L)
0.87 ± 0.35
0.80 ± 0.48
0.79 ± 0.52
0.81 ± 0.46
Salty (log g/L)
0.27 ± 0.49
0.25 ± 0.57
0.23 ± 0.53
0.26 ± 0.61
Sour (log g/L)
-0.25 ± 0.48
-0.15 ± 0.62
-0.24 ± 0.52
-0.08 ± 0.68
Bitter (log g/L)
-0.27 ± 0.31
-0.21 ± 0.29
-0.26 ± 0.28
-0.16 ± 0.29
GTAS
7.6 ± 2.0
7.6 ± 1.9
7.8 ± 1.7
7.4 ± 2.1
Citation: Bertoli S, Laureati M, Battezzati A, Bergamaschi V, Cereda E, Spadafranca A, Vignati L, Pagliarini E. Taste sensitivity, nutritional status and metabolic syndrome: Implication in weight loss dietary interventions. World J Diabetes 2014; 5(5): 717-723