Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Diabetes. Mar 15, 2011; 2(3): 41-48
Published online Mar 15, 2011. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v2.i3.41
Published online Mar 15, 2011. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v2.i3.41
References | Sample size | Age | Gender (F/M) | Major findings |
Hamilton et al, 2009 | 102 | 20-71 | 52/50 | Adult males with type 1 DM had lower BMD at hip, femoral neck and spine compared with age-matched controls (P ≤ 0.048). No significant difference in BMD between female type 1 DM vs age-matched controls. |
Mastrandrea et al, 2008 | 63 | 2-37 | 63/0 | Type 1 DM women ≥ 20 years of age had a reduction in BMD at hip, femoral neck and whole body. |
No significant difference in BMD between type 1 DM women < 20 years of age vs age-matched controls. | ||||
Soto et al, 2010 | 45 | 15-39 | 45/0 | Adolescent and adult women with type 1 DM had lower BMD at spine, femoral neck and whole body. No correlation between decreased BMD and sex steroid hormones. |
Saha et al, 2009 | 48 | 12-18 | 26/22 | Adolescent men and women with type 1 DM had lower BMC at the proximal femur. |
Men with type 1 DM had lower cortical bone mass and cross-sectional size than age-matched women with type 1 DM. | ||||
Lumachi et al, 2009 | 18 | 36-51 | 8/10 | Type 1 DM patients had ~60% lower BMD compared with age-matched controls. |
Heilman et al, 2009 | 30 | 5-19 | 11/19 | Type 1 DM patients had lower total BMC and lumbar BMD. Type 1 DM men had less physical activity than age-matched male controls. |
- Citation: Wongdee K, Charoenphandhu N. Osteoporosis in diabetes mellitus: Possible cellular and molecular mechanisms. World J Diabetes 2011; 2(3): 41-48
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v2/i3/41.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v2.i3.41