Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Diabetes. Aug 15, 2024; 15(8): 1726-1733
Published online Aug 15, 2024. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i8.1726
Published online Aug 15, 2024. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i8.1726
Table 1 Comparison of general information between the two groups of patients (mean ± SD)
Group | Height (cm) | Age (years) | Weight (kg) | Primiparas (cases) | Multiparas (cases) | Pregnant once (cases) | Pregnant ≥ 2 times (cases) | Weight gain during pregnancy (kg) |
POP group (n = 52) | 163.74 ± 6.11 | 28.28 ± 3.15 | 59.88 ± 8.41 | 39 | 13 | 35 | 17 | 20.05 ± 2.78 |
Non-POP group (n = 52) | 165.39 ± 6.53 | 28.36 ± 2.64 | 58.44 ± 9.59 | 36 | 16 | 37 | 15 | 19.98 ± 2.59 |
Table 2 Comparison of levator ani muscle’s hiatus area, anteroposterior diameter, and lateral diameter between two groups of pelvic organ prolapse patients, mean ± SD
Group | Number | LH area (cm²) | LH anteroposterior diameter (cm) | LH lateral diameter (cm) |
POP group | 52 | 14.94 ± 1.58 | 6.69 ± 0.72 | 4.18 ± 0.56 |
Non-POP group | 52 | 13.65 ± 0.97 | 5.15 ± 0.45 | 4.04 ± 0.17 |
Table 3 Pelvic organ prolapse quantification staging, anteroposterior diameter, and lateral diameter, mean ± SD
POP-Q stage | Number | LH area (cm²) | LH anteroposterior diameter (cm) | LH lateral diameter (cm) |
I | 35 | 14.58 ± 0.54 | 5.86 ± 0.41 | 3.57 ± 0.55 |
II | 8 | 15.73 ± 0.50 | 6.86 ± 0.62 | 4.28 ± 0.23 |
III | 7 | 16.23 ± 0.29 | 7.23 ± 0.18 | 4.75 ± 0.11 |
IV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 4 Incidence of macrosomia and stress urinary incontinence in two groups of pelvic organ prolapse patients, n (%)
Group | Number | Macrosomia | Stress urinary incontinence | Pelvic floor muscle weakness |
POP group | 52 | 23 (44.23) | 47 (90.38) | 35 (67.31) |
Non-POP Group | 52 | 27 (52.93) | 45 (86.54) | 26 (50.00) |
Table 5 Multifactorial logistic regression analysis
Factor | β | SE | Wald statistic | 95%CI |
Age | 3.005 | 0.570 | 4.698 | 1.542-14.399 |
Weight | 2.819 | 0.799 | 6.112 | 1.778-40.774 |
Parity (number of births) | 1.052 | 0.501 | 3.301 | 1.737-4.721 |
Gravidity (number of pregnancies) | 2.318 | 0.452 | 3.686 | 2.467-3.741 |
Gestational weight gain | 1.401 | 0.672 | 3.500 | 3.418-3.895 |
- Citation: Wang QH, Liu LH, Ying H, Chen MX, Zhou CJ, Li H. Clinically significant changes in anal sphincter hiatal area in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus and pelvic organ prolapse. World J Diabetes 2024; 15(8): 1726-1733
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v15/i8/1726.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v15.i8.1726