Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Diabetes. Feb 15, 2024; 15(2): 232-239
Published online Feb 15, 2024. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i2.232
Table 1 General characteristics was compared between two groups
Variables
Control group (n = 51)
T2DM group (n = 82)
χ2/Z/t value
P value
Gender (male/female)27/2447/350.2440.621
Age (yr)57.98 ± 11.7259.02 ± 11.580.5030.616
ALT (U/L)18.40 (13.20, 28.30)18.75 (13.48, 30.93)0.5580.577
AST (U/L)18.80 (11.80, 30.10)16.25 (12.48, 24.80)0.6940.488
SUA (mmol/L)312.51 ± 119.36306.20 ± 102.970.3230.747
Cre (mmol/L)68.36 ± 27.5470.16 ± 28.670.3570.721
HbA1c (%)5.30 (4.30, 6.60)9.30 (8.18, 11.13)9.0130
FBG (mmol/L)4.46 ± 0.8910.08 ± 4.309.1990
BMI (kg/m2)25.15 ± 4.28BMI25.55 ± 3.400.6020.548
LDL-C (mmol/L)2.30 (1.90, 3.30)2.34 (1.94, 3.23)0.2010.84
TG (mmol/L)1.40 (1.10, 2.30)1.81 (1.09, 2.68)1.5810.144
TC (mmol/L)4.45 ± 1.394.46 ± 1.290.0490.961
Table 2 Comparison of carcinoembryonic antigen, cancer antigen 199, cancer antigen 242 between two groups
Variables
Control group (n = 51)
T2DM group (n = 82)
Z value
P value
CEA2.10 (1.40, 2.70)2.70 (1.90, 3.65)3.2790.000
CA1997.60 (4.40, 10.10)11.30 (5.57, 22.13)3.9760.000
CA2426.10 (3.10, 6.90)6.25 (4.13, 9.20)0.8910.373
Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus
Factors
β value
SE
Wald
P value
OR
95%CI
FBG1.1550.3789.3300.0023.1731.513-6.658
HBA1C1.5170.44311.7390.0014.5601.914-10.863
CEA0.3120.1474.5050.0341.3661.024-1.822
CA1990.0340.0119.5540.0021.0351.013-1.057
CA2420.1450.1151.5850.2081.1560.923-1.448
Table 4 Comparison of general clinical characteristics and tumor marks of different glycosylated hemoglobin % diabetes patients
Variables
Group A (HbA1c ≤ 9%) (n = 37)
Group B (HbA1c > 9%) (n = 45)
t/Z value
P value
Age (yr)60.08 ± 9.5858.16 ± 13.050.7470.457
Gender (male/female)21/1626/190.0090.926
Course of disease (yr)6 (3.00, 10.50)9 (4, 15.00)1.6270.104
BMI (kg/m2)26.09 ± 2.6625.11 ± 3.881.3490.181
FBG (mmol/L)8.41 ± 2.7911.46 ± 4.843.3860.001
LDL-C (mmol/L)2.33 (1.93, 3.02)2.38 (1.94, 3.32)0.6800.496
TG (mmol/L)2.00 (1.23, 3.01)1.57 (0.96, 2.61)1.1420.254
TC (mmol/L)4.54 ± 1.024.40 ± 1.480.4940.623
Cre (umol/L)71.07 ± 19.3369.40 ± 34.720.2610.795
SUA (umol/L)333.64 ± 99.56283.64 ± 101.272.2420.028
ALT (U/L)17.30 (12.65, 28.75)19.90 (14.05, 31.45)0.7780.437
CEA (ng/mL)1.90 (1.20, 2.60)3.40 (2.60, 5.25)5.4880.000
CA199 (U/mL)7.60 (4.15, 10.60)21.00 (11.85, 26.85)4.7950.000
CA242 (U/mL)5.90 (3.85, 7.15)6.50 (4.80, 9.30)1.6220.105
Table 5 Correlation analysis of carcinoembryonic antigen, cancer antigen 199, cancer antigen 242 levels with glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting blood sugar and lipid metabolism in diabetes patients
VariablesCEA
CA199
CA242
r value
P value
r value
P value
r value
P value
HbA1c0.3080.0000.4260.0000.5510.000
FBG0.2360.0330.2310.0370.2980.006
LDL-C0.1380.2160.2380.0320.2400.030
TG0.1360. 2220.1050.3460.0510.649
TC0.0770.4940.1710.1250.1490.183