Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Diabetes. Oct 15, 2023; 14(10): 1493-1501
Published online Oct 15, 2023. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v14.i10.1493
Table 1 Empirical evidence concerning association between diabetes and poverty
Publication year
Objective(s)
Design
Data collection
Results
Ref.
2013The study examined the association between neighborhood-level poverty and hospital admission rates for T2DM in Rhode IslandLongitudinal studyRhode Island’s hospital discharge dataThe study found that poverty increased from 3% to 40%, and the associated diabetes admission rates increased from less than 2% to 30% per 1000 residents[9]
2011The study examined ‘‘upstream’’ influences (the social determinants of health) that contribute to ‘‘downstream’’ health disparities, focusing on variations in T2DM riskExploratory studyMixed data collection of focus group and surveyThe results showed that the most significant barriers to health and the source of T2DM disparities in the target population were structural. In other words, they were derived from the conditions within which individuals live, work, and play[17]
2002The study investigated the profile of diabetes and its complicationsComparative studyMedical diagnosisThe results revealed that the prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance was substantially lower among the low-income group than in the high-income group[19]
2012The study assessed the relationship between SES and T2DM in IndiaCross-sectional surveySelf-reporting diabetes statusThe study revealed that individuals with the highest SES seem to be at extreme risk for T2DM[20]
2012The study sought to determine whether inequality of income was connected with diabetes prevalence and inequality of care under a national health insurance program in AsiaCross-sectional surveyNational Health Insurance SchemeThe study revealed that the prevalence of diabetes was higher in low-income earners compared to middle-income counterparts[21]
2014The study examined the role of neighborhood poverty and racial composition in predicting race differences in diabetes incidenceCross-sectional surveyThe National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, medical examination and interviewThe study found that poverty was positively associated with diabetes for both Black and White people. Residing in a poor neighborhood amplified the odds of having diabetes for Black and White people[22]
2019It evaluated socioeconomic disparities in undiagnosed, diagnosed, and total diabetes as well as lifestyle variables as contributing factors to diabetes disparities in South AfricaCross-sectional studySouth African National Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyAs measured by self-reported clinical data, diabetes was more prevalent among higher socioeconomic groups in South Africa[23]
2023This study compared rural-urban differentials in prevalence and lifestyle factors associated with pre-diabetes and diabetes in the elderly in southwest ChinaCross-sectional health interview and examination surveyAnthropometric measurements as well as blood pressure and fasting blood glucose measurementsThe study revealed that the incidence of pre-diabetes and diabetes was higher among urban older adults compared to their rural contemporaries in southwest China[24]
2023The study examined the trends in income-related inequalities in diabetes prevalence and identified the contribution of determining factorsEstimation of income-related inequalities in diagnosed diabetesNational Health Interview SurveyThe study revealed that diabetes was more prevalent in low-income populations
Table 2 Accessibility of healthcare services among diabetic patients
Publication yearObjective(s)DesignData collectionResultsRef.
2018The study examined diabetic patients’ access to hemoglobin A1c testing in rural AfricaReview-The study proposed that routine access to hemoglobin A1c testing would allow for close monitoring of diabetes control as well as provide critical data informing the population level of diabetes complications. The study equally revealed that the major limitation for rural patients’ access to health care included high-cost medical services and a lack of preservative facilities[10]
2005The study assessed the barriers to care for patients with insulin-requiring diabetesRapid assessment protocolInterviews, discussions, and site visitsThe study revealed that several factors limited patients’ access to diabetes care, which included inadequate supply, the problem of quantification of need, equitable distribution of insulin, and unavailability of syringes and testing equipment[11]
2019This study analyzed the diabetes-related information routine in Kwazulu NatalDescriptive surveyData from the District Health information system of South AfricaThe study revealed that the number of diabetic patients seeking medical care increased 305% between 2006 to 2015, while the number of defaulters has decreased since 2012[26]
2015The study investigated females’ experience with diabetes care in Soweto, a township of JohannesburgQualitative studyInterviewThe study revealed that females identified structural barriers such as overcrowded clinics and poor access to medicines as hindering treatment adherence[27]
2012This study examined the association between access to health care and diabetes controlCorrelational researchNational Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, current health insurance coverageThe study revealed that lack of access to health care was linked with severe diabetic ailments. Diabetes control was associated with insurance coverage and some healthcare visits[28]
2022The study examined diabetes care factors and assessed their relative importanceCross-sectional studySurvey questionnaireThe study revealed that accessibility of diabetes care, availability of diabetes services, quality of diabetes care, diabetes management strategies, a health system’s basic amenities, and health education resources played a significant role in providing diabetes care services[29]
2019The study aimed to comprehend the factors that affected the utilization of DRSS and follow-up to inform health promotion strategies and improve the uptake of these servicesQualitative studyFocus group discussionThe study found that several factors affected patient uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening services, which included a lack of knowledge of both conditions and the need for screening, economic reasons, institutional factors, long waiting times at eye clinics, and fear of discomfort among others[30]
Table 3 Utilization of healthcare services among diabetic patients
Publication year Objective(s) DesignData collectionResultsRef.
2020The purpose of this study was to investigate the service needs and healthcare utilization among people with T2DMCross-sectional studySelf-report questionnaireThe study revealed that diabetic patients utilized outpatient visits, special visits, general practitioner visits, emergency room, and hospitalization[14]
2021The study investigated the impact of diabetes comorbidities on the health care use and cost of a cohort of elderly patients with diabetes and high care needs based on real-world dataDescriptive surveyNational Health DatasetsThe results showed that high-need elderly patients accessed emergency care and several outpatient visits[32]
2005This study described differences in healthcare utilization and indicators of patients with diabetes based on genderSurvey Computerized medical recordThe study revealed that females with diabetes use more healthcare services and have a higher morbidity rate than their male counterparts[33]
2022This study compared the utilization of primary healthcare services by elderly patients with and without T2DMSurvey studyElectronic patient records, health-related quality of life, self-rated healthPatients with diabetes utilized primary healthcare more than those without diabetes[34]
2022This study evaluated whether social determinants were associated with an increased risk of proliferative diabetic retinopathySurvey studyNational Institutes of Health All of Us Research Program data repositoryThis study revealed that patients affirmed that financial concerns and lack of access to transportation were the major reasons for delaying or avoiding access to health care[35]
2022The study examined the costs sustained by patients with IDDM who received hospital inpatient/observation/emergency department care (Higher care) for diabetes-related events with those who did not receive such care to identify a target group for treatment in a subsequent studyInstitutional reviewDocumented institutional dataIt was found in the study that 8.4% of IDDM patients received higher care yet incurred 20% in medical costs and nearly 40% in diabetic-related spending[36]
2017A study was conducted in Bangladesh to determine diabetes-related knowledge and factors affecting healthcare services utilization among patients with T2DMAnalytical studyInterviewer and semi-structured questionnairesAmong patients with T2DM, the study found that patients had average knowledge of diabetes management, which might affect the use of healthcare services[37]